Are you serious? That vegetation had depth of field. depth of field depth of ****ing field!AltogetherAndrews said:Textures? I thought that was one of the weaker components here, or at least it was in the official media. I was also surprised by the vegetation in the MS conference demonstration, didn't look too hot.
On the other hand, the experience itself looks to be incredible, making the inconsistencies and odd shortcomings easy to "forgive".
Angelus said:All we need now are Zombies.
Well that was worthwhile...Th game looked good, but not that interested in this type of games....basically have no interest
mysticstylez said:All I can say is that from the trailer we saw, I achieved maximum bonerage when I saw your camouflaged teammate get up from laying down. The dude was frickin perfectly blended in with the foliage it was boneriffic.
best way to put it.mysticstylez said:All I can say is that from the trailer we saw, I achieved maximum bonerage when I saw your camouflaged teammate get up from laying down. The dude was frickin perfectly blended in with the foliage it was boneriffic.
If that is just a taste of what kind of gameplay were in for COD4 will hit me in my weak spot for massive bonerage.
medrew said:He didn't play it. Nowhere does he saw he played it, it seems all they got was a full video of a level. ****ing hell.
"Right now there's no footage of what Activision and Infinity Ward showed us online"
Eggo said:Of the playable games in Barker hangar, I think COD4 looked the best. Also, since it's Infinity Ward, I expect the gameplay to be right there with the graphics. Other playable games that looked great were Ratchet & Clank, Drakes Fortune, Heavenly Sword, and surprisingly Turok. Lair had a fantastic engine, but I don't care for the Sixaxis controls, so that one is off my radar after having played it. No Killzone 2 or Rock Band in the hangar to get excited over.
Odrion said:I really didn't know what people were seeing in the first COD4 trailer, but those HD shots are really nice.
Whoohoo, this gen is finally utilizing it's graphics!
AltogetherAndrews said:How was Uncharted, did it control well? There were some complaints about that after the gamers day demonstration.
Orlics said:I think it's more fair to compare this game to Killzone 2 than Halo 3 from what we've seen, because Killzone 2 and CoD4 have a closer art-style than CoD4 and Halo 3. Halo just has this bright, clean aesthetic which few other games have.
*cough*Insomniac*cough* Just so you guys know I'm going to pimp this game harder than Brimstone pimped Shadowrun.rubso said:Infinity Ward: the only dudes who can develop a REAL NEXT-GEN game running @ 60fps
Insomniac? Does Ratchet run at 60 fps (Resistance did not)?BamYouHaveAids said:*cough*Insomniac*cough* Just so you guys know I'm going to pimp this game harder than Brimstone pimped Shadowrun.
Magicpaint said:I'm on the same page. I still think Killzone 2 and Halo 3 don't even come close. Killzone 2 has very low quality textures and very same looking environments with little colour, Halo 3 seems to me like has Halo 2 level of geomtery, textures and overall polygon thruput, just with the HD treatment and better lighting. CoD4 sports the best particles, lighting, geometry and frame rate. It's the only one that has actually stunned me visually. Which I most certainly didn't expect.
Magicpaint said:I'm on the same page. I still think Killzone 2 and Halo 3 don't even come close. Killzone 2 has very low quality textures and very same looking environments with little colour, Halo 3 seems to me like has Halo 2 level of geomtery, textures and overall polygon thruput, just with the HD treatment and better lighting. CoD4 sports the best particles, lighting, geometry and frame rate. It's the only one that has actually stunned me visually. Which I most certainly didn't expect.
DeathNote said:Halo 3 owned.
Works both ways doesn't it?
That's their goal, and it sounds like they're pretty close.dark10x said:I dunno, despite the positive impressions, the game still looks a bit...off to me. There's something about the visuals I just don't like. It's a nice looking game, but I prefer the appearance of Gears of War, Halo 3, and Killzone 2. The high framerate is awesome, though. If they really pull off 60 fps (constant), they will receive my praise.
Insomniac? Does Ratchet run at 60 fps (Resistance did not)?
roflthekad said:
tahrikmili said:Now that's just not true.. I don't want to post Halo pics in a COD4 thread, but damn, that's just so wrong.
DeathNote said:Halo 3 owned.
Works both ways doesn't it?
You can say "Killzone" until you're blue in the face, and I certainly am looking forward to wiping up Helghast with the rest of you, but for my money, COD4 is the shit.
capslock said:Is this the same dude who said Ninja Gaiden DS looks better than anything on PSP?
PnCIa said:I don´t care what some random guy from 1up is writing anymore. They totally lost it when they did the Gears <----> Killzone thing.
CoD4 looks better than Halo 3 though, what is quite funny considering that Bungie has only one platform to take care off and is Microsofts uber developer what should give them as much resources as they need.