Why both difference (I mean there are 2 thing difference)?
I couldn't work out the reason of this. I can tell the first one is not on the second one because no frap and the heath bar is not the same, but rest of them are look really same.
Maybe screen stretch but the yellow closer to green on the 2nd picture than 1st one. Could be photoshop "frap.com" before sent to vita.
[Edit] Never mind I found the 3rd links. - make sense, Kotaku linked to Chinese decided rumour thread which have 3rd link is in OP.
Looks to me like they just took the first pic, photoshopped over the "www.fraps.com" and the part of the healthbar behind it, and slapped it on a Vita.
I don't see the word "fraps" on the Vita's screen.
Perfect.Kotaku, just post your bullshit rumors here first and we'll debunk them before you publish them.
yea its a 8/10I'm late to the party is that a fake/hoax/bullshot?
That's one hell of a .gif.
That's one hell of a .gif.
It's probably time to ban Kotaku.
If I had a Vita I totally would.I guess it would make for a hilarious Vita wallpaper.
Yeah like Capcom would put any effort into MHs visuals.
*sigh* One last time for this thread: It's not about "effort." Higher-quality assets come at a cost.
Can you give any factual reason - as opposed to your own (understandable) desire to see an MH with better visuals - why Capcom would have cause to expect that a higher-budget MH with even Soul Sacrifice-quality assets would be more profitable than the route they're actually going?
Confirmed.Rumor: No One Should Pay Any Attention to Kotaku
There isn't one if they're looking to stay in Japan with MH, but they're going to need all the bells and whistles if they want to expand the series outside of it.
Look at how Dragon's Dogma sold outside Japan. Why would MH - a series generally considered significantly more intimidating and less accessible than DD - sell vastly better than that if Capcom were to give it comparable production values?
Kotaku.
I'm fairly certain even the PSP MHs sold more outside of Japan than Dragon's Dogma has. I don't think that's a good comparison to bring up.
Anyone figured out what is this game? Cause I kinda wanna play it, MH ripoff or not, I'm dying for a Monster Hunter game that doesn't look for shit. Even frontier isn't very good. But I only tried the Korean version, I heard the Japanese one has updated graphics.
Well, I did say vastly better than DD, not just better. Selling on par with the PSP MHs or even MHTri in the West wouldn't be enough, in light of the considerably higher budget that many here want to see Capcom blow on the franchise.
Anyone figured out what is this game? Cause I kinda wanna play it, MH ripoff or not, I'm dying for a Monster Hunter game that doesn't look for shit. Even frontier isn't very good. But I only tried the Korean version, I heard the Japanese one has updated graphics.
Capcom's eventually going to have to pull this series out of the dog days of SD development
I would have to respectfully disagree there. I think most of the available evidence suggests that visuals simply aren't as important to Japanese gamers as they are in the West, and that PS2-ish graphics (if that) are "good enough" there for a large majority of franchises.