iceatcs
Junior Member
I think couple of them, I know one studio only made TV and Pizza Hut apps so far.How many studios making Kinect games and TV shows do MS even need?
I think couple of them, I know one studio only made TV and Pizza Hut apps so far.How many studios making Kinect games and TV shows do MS even need?
They did make Loco Roco, Patatpon, Ape Escape, Echocrome, and helped make Ico/Colossus, and Siren series.
It was iMax with who ridiculously thought the number of first party studios a company has results in how large their first party is.
Nice try to stir things up again though.
I agree with your point and your goal was correct, but you shouldn't have started a list war. It "depends on how you interpret what 'larger' means" is enough as a reply to those people. Sony has the larger first party, because they have more employees. MS has the larger first party, because they have more studios etc.I don't believe studio numbers reflect game quality; as others have mentioned, look at titles like Mark of the Ninja. I used it merely as a point of illustration. When it was mentioned by someone that 'Sony had a larger first party than Microsoft', I wanted to make a point that this a) depends on how you interpret what 'larger' means, and b) is not necessarily reflective of the quality of titles being produced (as shown with the Metacritic links).
I agree with your point and your goal was correct, but you shouldn't have started a list war. It "depends on how you interpret what 'larger' means" is enough as a reply to those people. Sony has the larger first party, because they have more employees. MS has the larger first party, because they have more studios etc.
It's all right and all wrong.
I didn't start a list war. I sourced my argument.
There's some real BS brewing here. Why don't we show who has produced the better 1st party and new ip's this gen? Then you have a better outlook who will continue this into the next. You can count all the studios you want but that doesn't mean shit.
But your list and sources don't contain the whole picture. Mine does neither. That's what we call a list war.I didn't start a list war. I sourced my argument.
Thank you. I think its pretty safe to say Sony have the larger first party.
So?I count digital titles, even if many here bizarrely don't.
the manpower dosnt mean pretty much nothing
Soe 664+ employees to give ps3 Free realms and Dc online!??!!?
There's some real BS brewing here. Why don't we show who has produced the better 1st party and new ip's this gen? Then you have a better outlook who will continue this into the next. You can count all the studios you want but that doesn't mean shit.
why say something like that when it is so easy to look it up and see that that is so wrong?
SOE has pushed out some really great stuff on PC, I hope the PS4 gets some of this MMO lovin too.
true but clearly not much for ps3
the manpower dosnt mean pretty much nothing
Soe 664+ employees to give ps3 Free realms and Dc online!??!!?
PS3 is a very weak system, it cannot handle mmo's. I played Dust 514 the other day, it was so bad....
PS3 is a very weak system, it cannot handle mmo's. I played Dust 514 the other day, it was so bad....
ps3 too weak
only ps2 can handle mmorpgs
(Wait, what, dude?)
PS3 is a very weak system, it cannot handle mmo's. I played Dust 514 the other day, it was so bad....
i sold the ps3 some months ago ..waiting the next gen...so i cant try that game
i was just pointing that manpower dosnt mean pretty much nothing...
PD is more important than SOE for ps console with 1/6 of the employees
ps3 too weak
only ps2 can handle mmorpgs
(Wait, what, dude?)
SOE is probably the one thing that could hype me the most, I would love a console specific MMO with PS Home integration and everything.
I'm surprised anyone thinks highly of 'manpower', as if Journey isn't great because it's a small team, or the thousand people who work all year round to shit out one awful Assassin's Creed game after another.
Quality and frequency are the only gauges that matter, and one of them is wholly subjective.
Wasn't An Elysian Tale made by one guy?
Well they just released Planetside 2 on PC last year, it is one of the most epic and beautiful games you can play on PC.
SOE is separate from SCE though, SOE mainly works on PC development.
Lack of ram...mmo's these days need lots of ram
I think he is solely talking about 2013. So far we have confirmed:So?
Sony have published none this year. Last year they published Datura, Journey, PixelJunk 4am and The Unfinished Swan. PixelJunk isn't a new IP, I would imagine the other three will never get sequels, and even if they did, three isn't in anyway a lot for PSN in a year.
So again, what are you talking about?
omg someone show a list with ps3/ps4 first party studios and relative employees
i read it and seen Soe 600+ employees
and i write back
manpower dosnt mean nothing + soe released more on pc than ps3.+ they developed just 3 games for ps3 internally the others r just published
is this so bad?!?!?!
I have zero idea whats going on in this thread anymore. Any updates on the OP's story?
So?
Sony have published none this year. Last year they published Datura, Journey, PixelJunk 4am and The Unfinished Swan. PixelJunk isn't a new IP, I would imagine the other three will never get sequels, and even if they did, three isn't in anyway a lot for PSN in a year.
So again, what are you talking about?
There's nothing inherently wrong with the quality of Microsoft's first party output. At retail, recent games likes Gears Judgment, Forza Horizon, Dance Central 3 and Halo 4 are all perfectly decent games that did well both critically and commercially. On the XBLA front, games like Fez, Mark of the Ninja, Trials, Spelunky etc are also games that have been very successful.
It's in no way 'shabby', but I don't think it's indicative of Sony not front loading next-gen with new IP too. They've only announced Drive Club and Knack so far, but I imagine they'll have more than a couple more to come.I think he is solely talking about 2013. So far we have confirmed:
-TLOU
-Beyond
-Puppeteer
-Rain
-Until Dawn
Besides rain they are all retail titles and new IPs. They probably introduced even more in the first years of the PS3, but for the last big year of the PS3 5 new IPs isn't too shabby. It doesn't really matter if they are original or not. MS definitely released more in the first years than currently.
I see two games here that are first party... That is not a whole lot.
honestly I could careless if it's 69th party, as long as it has the games I want play.
What do you mean? 'Next-gen' isn't far away at all. Launching new IP this summer on 360, versus this holiday on Xbox 3 doesn't seem like it'll make much difference in terms of where the market is at that time. Do you mean MS should hold all new IP until the market is on the rise, even if it means not supporting their new system?Launching new software at this point, when software sales are on the decline isn't good. MS know this which is why they're focussing on the next gen.
What do you mean? 'Next-gen' isn't far away at all. Launching new IP this summer on 360, versus this holiday on Xbox 3 doesn't seem like it'll make much difference in terms of where the market is at that time. Do you mean MS should hold all new IP until the market is on the rise, even if it means not supporting their new system?
I see two games here that are first party... That is not a whole lot.
I see two games here that are first party... That is not a whole lot.
Doesn't the market indifference to the WiiU suggest the lackluster sales are not current-gen fatigue, and is actually just console fatigue?They're about to launch a new console. Based off sales for games this year there is little interest in the current generation. So instead MS are going to focus everything on the new system and the years ahead, as that's more likely to reignite interest in games and software.
They're about to launch a new console. Based off sales for games this year there is little interest in the current generation. So instead MS are going to focus everything on the new system and the years ahead, as that's more likely to reignite interest in games and software.
The only issue with this statement is that if Microsoft funded the game, and the creators didn't buy back rights to the franchise, the games are 1st-party even if the studios that made them aren't.
Gears Judgment = Microsoft-funded 1st-party IP made by 3rd-party studio
Forza Horizon - Microsoft-funded 1st-party IP made by 1st-party studio
Halo 4 - Microsoft-funded 1st-party IP made by 1st-party studio
Fez - 3rd-party IP that Microsoft bought timed-exclusive rights for
Mark of the Ninja - Microsoft-funded 1st-party IP made by 3rd-party studio
Trials - Microsoft co-funded 1st-party IP made in partnership with Ubisoft
Spelunkey - 3rd-party IP
So you are saying MS basically screwed their current customers over in terms of new IP for the past few years because they are 'focusing' on next-gen? Even when we still have games like CoD outselling the previous iteration every year? Tell me you aren't serious.
No. Tokyo Jungle, Starhawk, and Sorcery last year.TLOU is Sonys first new IP since 2010 isn't it?
Every publisher screwed us over in terms of new IP over the last few years. Aside from Dishonored there has been nothing as its just not viable at this stage. TLOU is Sonys first new IP since 2010 isn't it?