Isn't it? Prove me wrong. Prove that RNA can't progress over billions of years into a complex organism.
The beauty of living organisms is that you come designed with a full instructions set (DNA), and existing cells do the rest of the work. The only difference with a designed car's blueprint (it's DNA) is that you have to buy each part and then assemble it.
Why was DNA designed to look like we had a common ancestor with the apes?
Isn't science striving towards this? more-so this, than figuring out how humans evolved from apes. See the difference between useful scientific research and not so amusing stories?
Science is trying to find out many things, mostly how life originated and how and why it evolved into complex systems. By the way humans are classified as apes. You still haven't explained why the lab experiment couldn't happen by chance in a billion years?
If I start with a wild dog, it will most likely become more varied with time. Your point?
But you didn't start with a dog or anything resembling a dog. You started with things that were rather similar according to fossil records so how did they become varried? If the intelligent designer uses the same base for everything. Why does he need to be present at all to design things if the mechanisms for mutation and self replication were present to begin with?
Well, the earth is billions of years old. Either you think the earth isn't that old or you think that we were not thought of untill a few thousand years ago and just designed to cope with the earth as it was then instead of the earth being designed for us. Meaning were were governed by the environment in some way.
There is a lot of evidence backing up the fact that we have lots of commonalities down to the dna level with other animals. If your intelligent design claim were true, we would have been designed from the ground up. Yet remnant/dormant genes are present in all animals and can even be switched on by accident. Which proves creatures were not designed from the ground up and seperate from each other.
If a design is based on another design but with altered features, isn't that really evolution?