Lol. I just visited like several movie threads at random, and you're throwing shade in every single one.
Is this an ILM scene?
I'm a big fan of Nolan, but something about the camerawork and action in this looks real... stilted. Like something out of a pre-Saving Private Ryan era.
This jam and tea scene alone might trigger a lot of Americans.
I can confirm it will in fact be a movie and not a trailer
Sums up a space odyssey quite well.More like longness and confusedness and basically nonsenseness.
Cool to hear, thanks for your crowd service!Nope, Double Negative. I was the crowd artist for these beach shots (mostly aerial) and while there were a huge number of extras some of the head-level shots also had CG guys to pad them out.
The first shot in the trailer was one of my major ones and is entirely CG, crowd wise. But if any of you have sharp eyes you'll see that it's different from the prologue version, which was using DMP crowds alongside the CG.
Lol. I just visited like several movie threads at random, and you're throwing shade in every single one.
I'm curious to see if Americans see a WW2 movie that doesn't seem to have any Americans in it
I'm betting on no
Looks good though, something about Nolan's dry and cool style is a good match for the setting
This trailer makes the film look way more like a straight ahead action flick.
If they cut another trailer together that emphasizes that aspect over the "historical drama" stuff, I bet people pack in there pretty decently.
If this movie has a "hallway fight" type moment, they need to probably sneak a couple seconds of whatever that is into the marketing.
I think it's less about not having any Americans in it, and more about the movie is not about Americans. LOL Beyond the brand of Nolan directing and good will his name has with American audiences, I think this film will be a tough sell to America especially since it's being put in the thick of other Summer Popcorn Blockbusters. I'm not so sure people want to watch such a serious historical war film in July.
What film that debuts the same weekend do you think beats the other? Dunkirk or Valerian.
We will see how much his name carries weight. Plus Inception worked in the middle of more common or usual summer movies.
Anyway regardless of how good the movie is or how well it does, I know from some of the shots that scenes in tight spaces with water closing in are going to make me tense as hell. I'm not usually claustrophobic but water scares the shit out of me.
Dunkirk will handily beat Valerian at the box office.
Looks pretty freakin boring. War has never looked so tame.
But there was a ton of fighting on the Dunkirk perimeter. French and British defenders would fight so hard that they ran out of ammunition. We haven't seen much of this from the film, but it'd be easy to incorporate if Nolan was interested in it.It's not war. It's survival. Don't expect any battles like Saving Private Ryan or Hacksaw Ridge. That's not what Dunkirk was.
But there was a ton of fighting on the Dunkirk perimeter. French and British defenders would fight so hard that they ran out of ammunition. We haven't seen much of this from the film, but it'd be easy to incorporate if Nolan was interested in it.
That may be the goal, but in doing so, Nolan would also be perpetuating the myth of Dunkirk and failing to tell the complete story by the same token. Those men wouldn't be waiting on the beach if it weren't for all of the heavy fighting covering their evacuation. The Battle of Dunkirk was possibly the hardest fought battle in Western Europe until 1944 so there isn't much excuse for ignoring that aspect of it.This film is mostly focusing on the men stranded on the beaches though. Nolan wanted to focus on the psychological torture these men went through. Not knowing if they were ever going to be rescued and stuck on the beach getting picked off from the skies. This film is basically going to be non-stop suspense with a race against time. Most of the action seems like it'll be coming from the dogfights.
That may be the goal, but in doing so, Nolan would also be perpetuating the myth of Dunkirk and failing to tell the complete story by the same token. Those men wouldn't be waiting on the beach if it weren't for all of the heavy fighting covering their evacuation. The Battle of Dunkirk was possibly the hardest fought battle in Western Europe until 1944 so there isn't much excuse for ignoring that aspect of it.
But Nolan can't pull off action choreography.It's going to be a lean film with little dialogue and suspenseful action pretty much throughout. But I can see how someone might be a little disappointed if it's not like Saving Private Ryan.
Have you seen the movie or something?You're right, the evacuation wouldn't be possible without those men fighting off the opposition. However, I fail to see how that would be perpetuating a myth on Nolan's part by not focusing on that aspect. That aspect of the event can be explained with a few snippets of dialogue without actually showing it. Besides, we do get glimpses of some soldiers evading fire within the city so we may get some of that in the film as well. I'm just saying that's not what Nolan wanted to focus on. The actual evacuation is what this film is centered on and it's going to be told from three different perspectives. Think of the film as more Fury Road than any other WWII films. It's going to be a lean film with little dialogue and suspenseful action pretty much throughout. But I can see how someone might be a little disappointed if it's not like Saving Private Ryan.
But Nolan can't pull off action choreography.
Have you seen the movie or something?
Well there is a difference between saying "I took inspiration from one of the best movies of the last decade" in a hype interview and actually pulling off a Fury Roadesque movie.No, but you can read interviews of Nolan talking about the film and if you've seen the prologue you can get a more accurate representation of the tone of the film that you may not get from the marketing so far. Also, this is based on a historical event.
Well there is a difference between saying "I took inspiration from one of the best movies of the last decade" in a hype interview and actually pulling off a Fury Roadesque movie.
But I hope you're right.
The spectacle in Inception is fantastic.But Nolan can't pull off action choreography.
Hoyte has been such an upgrade over Wally
Hoyte has been such an upgrade over Wally
I think the editing on these trailers has been pretty ass but I have total confidence the movie will be amazing .
Btw just realized that Prometheus had a better RT percentage than Interstellar , lol....what a joke .
Random but yeah...
I really like that they're using real Spitfires.
Yeah. Tdk trilogy looked great (best looking cape movies tbh) but the shots he got out of hoyte in interstellar and now this are looking like an improvement
The myth is about downplaying the non-evacuation parts of Dunkirk and in ignoring the non-British roles. Just showing the evacuation is exactly the sort of thing that perpetuates the myth. It'd also be a bit like a film about Midway that doesn't show the battle.You're right, the evacuation wouldn't be possible without those men fighting off the opposition. However, I fail to see how that would be perpetuating a myth on Nolan's part by not focusing on that aspect. That aspect of the event can be explained with a few snippets of dialogue without actually showing it.
Not Memento, although if the remake goes to plan it will probably have the sterile look.
Well, we don't know what Wally would have been capable off doing the same movies.
As someone who has been an extra for this movie, I think you folks are gonna love it. Some craaaazy practical FX and stuntwork goes down in this.
Is that you?
The 5 minute sequence that they showed in cinemas was straight up action with barely any dialogue, and he has said he's going for a more focused visual approach rather than lots of exposition like in his other movies. I'd love if this became the Fury Road of WW2 movies.