• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New Info: Trump's Ties to Sergei Millian, Russian Intelligence (& Detailed Timeline)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Polari

Member
Please elucidate how reporting the known facts in the OP is "fake news" and "birther-level nonsense".

Every single entry in that timeline is a proven fact. Trump's business ties to Russia are well documented, and yes the ancillary connection to Russian intelligence gathering is tenuous, but here is all the data so you can draw whatever conclusion you like from it at this early stage. This isn't a baseless accusation. This is simply a timeline of proven connections, given at a time when provable facts are now questioned.

Let's take your "evidence" from 2008 as an example:

2008
”Then, in the 2007-2008 years, Russians were buying tens of apartments in Trump buildings in the U.S.A.," Millian bragged to RIA. ”But I wouldn't want to disclose concrete sums or names."[1][2]

Trump made significant money from one Russian oligarch in 2008, when he sold a mansion in Palm Beach for $95 million to Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev. Trump had bought the home at a bankruptcy auction less than four years earlier for $41.4 million.[3]

Donald Trump Jr. said, at a 2008 real estate conference in New York, "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets." He added, "We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."[1][2]
The Russian market had ”natural strength, especially in the high-end sector." Moscow held special appeal because wealthy people throughout the region wanted to own real estate in the capital city, he said.[4]

In his 2008 speech, Donald Jr. announced that he had traveled to Russia six times in the previous 18 months. But, he said, Russia presented enormous challenges.
”As much as we want to take our business over there, Russia is just a different world," the younger Trump said. ”It is a question of who knows who, whose brother is paying off who. . . . It really is a scary place."[4]

Concurrently, Sergei Millian's online biography prominently bragged that he had worked ”as a broker for projects with Donald Trump."[1]

I'm not sure what the point is to any of this. Wealthy Russians were putting their money prime real estate all around the globe at this point. Take this article from The Guardian in 2007 for example:

"Russians are a huge driving force at the top end of the London property market," said Grace Margolies, a Russian speaker brought in to work Knight Frank's Mayfair office. "Up until two years ago it was the oligarchs, the people who measure their wealth in billions, who were regularly buying trophy houses for tens of millions of pounds in areas like Belgravia. Mayfair and Regent's Park. They come with a team of people and buy into the concept; they see a house or a flat and if they like it they want the lot, the furniture, the fittings, everything - and it all has to be to the very highest spec."

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/apr/13/2

There's about a million other articles around this period and documenting the same thing.

There's nothing remotely relevant or interesting about anything you've put together. Lots of investors in Trump property were Russians. So what? That's pretty much what you'd expect. And Chinese and Arabs - anywhere where there was a whole lot of new wealth, the wealthy were buying prime real estate abroad. Trump probably looked at investing in all those countries as well, as if those people were buying prime real estate abroad, it probably meant there was enough wealth in those countries to support domestic investments.

Basically it's just a whole lot of Russian bashing. Some guy called Dmitry Rybolovlev buying a house off Trump means he gets named in your fake news as well.
 

Polari

Member
Curious why you didn't post in the Trump press thread, where he sent his guy to deliberately send out fake news. No harsh words or even a constructive criticism. Glad to see you here calling out fake news from a random neo gaffer and not the President of the United States though.

Huh? I did. That was ridiculous.
 

hawk2025

Member
It is truly amazing how people take their marching orders from the Trump camp right down to the rhetorical devices and blatant logical fallacies.

The coopting of the term "fake news" is nothing short of astounding.

Downright disgusting, but astounding.
 

Polari

Member
It is truly amazing how people take their marching orders from the Trump camp right down to the rhetorical devices and blatant logical fallacies.

The coopting of the term "fake news" is nothing short of astounding.

Downright disgusting, but astounding.

Apologies - next time I will remember to refer to it as "a wild conspiracy theory".
 

BowieZ

Banned
There's nothing remotely relevant or interesting about anything you've put together. Lots of investors in Trump property were Russians. So what? That's pretty much what you'd expect. And Chinese and Arabs - anywhere where there was a whole lot of new wealth, the wealthy were buying prime real estate abroad. Trump probably looked at investing in all those countries as well, as if those people were buying prime real estate abroad, it probably meant there was enough wealth in those countries to support domestic investments.

Basically it's just a whole lot of Russian bashing. Some guy called Dmitry Rybolovlev buying a house off Trump means he gets named in your fake news as well.
Firstly, it's not "my" news and it's not "fake".

You can determine your own conclusion however you like, and feel free to agree or disagree with the conclusions hinted at by the opinion authors in some of these news articles (as pointed out in my final paragraph, second post).

But it's not "fake". You are being unequivocally dishonest when you claim that.



Let me repeat: nothing about these facts are fake.



Anyway, while what you also post are also facts (and indeed, one could spend forever compiling a massive document of facts on the history of any industry zeitgeist or concept) you seem to be missing multiple key facts. Maybe this wasn't clear to you? If so, I apologise:

1. Donald Trump has a history of business dealings with Russians.

2. In numerous statements, Donald Trump has either lied or misled about his business dealings with Russia. It's one or the other. He has either lied, or misled (intentionally or not).

3. Donald Trump has officially refused to release his tax returns, regardless of the result of his apparent audit.

4. In numerous statements, Donald Trump has advocated lifting sanctions to be able to engage in trade and business deals with Russia.

5. Donald Trump has refused to divest his business holdings, and has temporarily passed on the reins of his business to his two sons, with a self-appointed separation committee mechanic.

6. Thus, Donald Trump would factually profit from any such deals.


To clarify, this obviously doesn't in and of itself have anything to do with claims he was privy to Russian attempts to hack the DNC, etc., or that there indeed exists any kompromat. That is a separate discussion, with which you're also entitled to enter into debate. Although let it be known that it is also a FACT that Trump openly called out for Russia to hack Clinton, during the campaign.
 

Dhx

Member
It is truly amazing how people take their marching orders from the Trump camp right down to the rhetorical devices and blatant logical fallacies.

The coopting of the term "fake news" is nothing short of astounding.

Downright disgusting, but astounding.

What is this? Trump coopted the term himself. "Fake news" as a term didn't remotely start with Trump.
 

Polari

Member
Firstly, it's not "my" news and it's not "fake".

You can determine your own conclusion however you like, and feel free to agree or disagree with the conclusions hinted at by the opinion authors in some of these news articles (as pointed out in my final paragraph, second post).

But it's not "fake". You are being unequivocally dishonest when you claim that.



Let me repeat: nothing about these facts are fake.



Anyway, while what you also post are also facts (and indeed, one could spend forever compiling a massive document of facts on the history of any industry zeitgeist or concept) you seem to be missing two key facts. Maybe this wasn't clear to you? If so, I apologise:

1. Donald Trump has a history of business dealings with Russians.

2. In numerous statements, Donald Trump has either lied or misled about his business dealings with Russia. It's one or the other. He has either lied, or misled (intentionally or not).

3. Donald Trump has officially refused to release his tax returns, regardless of the result of his apparent audit.

4. In numerous statements, Donald Trump has advocated lifting sanctions to be able to engage in trade and business deals with Russia.

5. Donald Trump has refused to divest his business holdings, and has temporarily passed on the reins of his business to his two sons, with a self-appointed separation committee mechanic.

6. Thus, Donald Trump would factually profit from any such deals.

It is fake news though, because it's using a whole lot of unrelated facts to try and imply Trump has ties to Russian intelligence agencies. Look at your thread title.

Your six points are fair, but don't relate to your thread title at all. They're about conflicts of interest between Trump's presidency and his business interests.
 

Dhx

Member
Firstly, it's not "my" news and it's not "fake".

I wouldn't call it fake, but I would call it an unfiltered info dump throwing every remote possible connection to anything Russian in a pile to make a larger implication. There is no context to anything here at all. It reads very much like Loose Change, frankly.
 

BowieZ

Banned
It is fake news though, because it's using a whole lot of unrelated facts to try and imply Trump has ties to Russian intelligence agencies. Look at your thread title.

Your six points are fair, but don't relate to your thread title at all. They're about conflicts of interest between Trump's presidency and his business interests.
No, I refuse to concede to your false assertion that the news is "fake".

You're more than welcome, however, to simply suggest that my title was misleading (unintentional, a result of limited characters, but I'm happy to amend the OP to reflect). It is a fact that people do this sort of thing in threads on NeoGAF all the time: politely suggest the thread title is misleading, and encourage correction.

You're doing what Sean Spicer did yesterday. Rather than politely suggesting a falsehood that can be tested by other facts, you're dismissing the credibility of the whole piece of reporting by tarnishing the credibility of the facts therein.

I wouldn't call it fake, but I would call it an unfiltered info dump throwing every remote possible connection to anything Russian in a pile to make a larger implication. There is no context to anything here at all. It reads very much like Loose Change, frankly.
I disagree. You're conflating the publication of an "unfiltered info dump" with an attempt "to make larger implication".

I am only doing the former, not the latter.

People can draw whatever conclusion they like from this timeline of connections. Personally, I find the connection to intelligence gathering extremely tenuous, but not implausible, based on the known facts. His conflicts of interest, however, are quite obvious, given the facts. EDIT: Actually, I forgot that I did draw one personal conclusion in the opening introductory paragraphs, that overall there are proven facts that Millian has used falsehoods to systematically deny and diminish any connection to Trump. This is the same general conclusion the authors of the various articles have reached.
 
I wouldn't call it fake, but I would call it an unfiltered info dump throwing every remote possible connection to anything Russian in a pile to make a larger implication. There is no context to anything here at all. It reads very much like Loose Change, frankly.
It's called alternative facts now anyway. Get with the times lol
 

Chmpocalypse

Blizzard
It is fake news though, because it's using a whole lot of unrelated facts to try and imply Trump has ties to Russian intelligence agencies. Look at your thread title.

Your six points are fair, but don't relate to your thread title at all. They're about conflicts of interest between Trump's presidency and his business interests.

That's not fake news. You are being deliberately dishonest.

The facts are not fake, no matter how much you wish them to be.

Conclusions can be debated. These facts cannot.

Stop lying.
 
giphy.gif
 

quesalupa

Member
I'm not sure how the whole journal system works, but if you've got all of the lehiy references that info may be more useful in better hands than GAF.
 
It is fake news though, because it's using a whole lot of unrelated facts to try and imply Trump has ties to Russian intelligence agencies. Look at your thread title.

Your six points are fair, but don't relate to your thread title at all. They're about conflicts of interest between Trump's presidency and his business interests.

You seem to not know what "fake news" is.

Fake News isn't someone posting an Op Ed with controversial opinions.

Fake News is when COMPLETELY 100% FALSE stories are presented falsely as though they were genuine news stories.
 

Polari

Member
That's not fake news. You are being deliberately dishonest.

The facts are not fake, no matter how much you wish them to be.

Conclusions can be debated. These facts cannot.

Stop lying.

The irony here is killing me. I think you'll find OP is the one being deliberately dishonest.
 
The irony here is killing me. I think you'll find OP is the one being deliberately dishonest.

You seem to have missed my post so I'll repeat it for good measure:

Fake News isn't someone posting an Op Ed with controversial opinions.

Fake News is when COMPLETELY 100% FALSE stories are presented falsely as though they were genuine news stories.

The OP posted factual articles and then constructed an opinionated claim around those facts.
 

Sianos

Member
The irony here is killing me. I think you'll find OP is the one being deliberately dishonest.

This is just a presentation of things that were said and things that happened, as reported by multiple sources. The conclusions are ours to draw based on what is known - and it appears that the implications of this information is in accordance with what is becoming quite the trend for Trump lately.

Perhaps you could try to criticize the post for lacking some amount of context or missing a crucial fact, but that would require some effort. You know, like the effort that went into compiling together the information to write this post. You do realize that you can't just shout "fake news", you have to actually demonstrate why the story does not have any basis, right? You know, like how Pizzagate was debunked by people pointing out that the only piece of supposed """evidence""" for it was Podesta ordering apparently too much pizza.

There are some interesting contradictions and false denials presented here - thank you for your work, BowieZ.
 

zou

Member
You seem to not know what "fake news" is.

Fake News isn't someone posting an Op Ed with controversial opinions.

Fake News is when COMPLETELY 100% FALSE stories are presented falsely as though they were genuine news stories.

Same guy questioned whether things were really that bad in North Korea or just western propaganda.

Something to keep in mind when discussing "fake news" with that particular user ...

Looks folks, I'm sorry I was wrong. North Korea suck ass and is a living hell, I know it because I saw it on CNN. Let's not even bother discussing it
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=53424888#post53424888
 

BajiBoxer

Banned
The irony here is killing me. I think you'll find OP is the one being deliberately dishonest.

What? No he's not. He could be wrong, but he laid out all the sources and connections he's drawing his opinion from. That's pretty darn honest in where he is coming from. It's the opposite of "intentionally dishonest".
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
UPDATE: A couple of posters have falsely accused this of being fake news. They are mistaken, as the entirety of the information here is simply proven factual information. However, they may be correct in their assertion that my title is misleading, which is unintentional and only a result of limited characters in NeoGAF titles, and perhaps an assumption of my intention to publish lots of little bits of information relating to the subject. Perhaps a better title would thus be: "MotherJones publishes new interview with Sergei Millian, who now dubiously denies having a substantive business relationship with Trump, with detailed timeline for context (to give readers a chance to draw their own conclusions about an important national affair)".


On Thursday, MotherJones reported fresh research into links between Trump and Russia—particularly his mysterious dealings with the evasive Sergei Millian, who in 2011 serviced in some capacity an FBI-investigated Russian Foreign Ministry intelligence-gathering program.

Sergei Millian is an underreported but key link between Trump (and Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen) and Putin's credibly suspected machinations to seek compromising intelligence from Americans.

Expectedly, Millian has in the past half-year attempted to purge his ties to Trump from the Internet but now, this past week, has finally spoken out in a highly evasive, falsifying manner, to categorically deny a rich, decade-long connection that, to the contrary, is categorically borne out by known facts.

I couldn't see this posted yet on GAF. I also did some research and translated some facts and dates from this and a couple of other articles into an exhaustive, cohesive timeline, especially for those who don't have a good grasp of the whole picture. (This took me 7 hours to compile.) I believe that this information is of critical importance in understanding the current known links to potential Russian intelligence-gathering.

If you're already well-informed on this topic, please skip to the 2017 section (second post) for the "new news".

millian-trump-630.jpg

Sergei Millian and U.S. President Trump, 2007

BACKGROUND
Sergei Millian is a player in a larger web of controversial business ties between Trump, the Trump Organization, and Russia. He is president of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce in the USA (RACC) and the owner of a translation service. Millian's online bio notes he graduated from the Minsk State Linguistic University with the equivalent of a master's degree in 2000. His bio says he is a real estate broker who works in residential and commercial properties in the United States and abroad.[2]

He used to go by the name Siarhei Kukuts (tr: Sergei Kukut)—that's how he's listed on tax returns for the RACC—and it is unclear why he changed his name. Social media accounts on Facebook and Russian social network Vkontakte link him to family by the name "Kukut" in Belarus, and his page on the website for the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce (RACC) gives the name "Sergei Millian" as an alias. “I am US citizen and do not have and never had Russian citizenship. When immigrants arrive to USA, it is a common practice to change their name,” he told The Daily Beast in an email. He is in his late 30s and won't say when he came to the United States or how he obtained US citizenship.[1][2]

Internet posts from Millian’s early years in the U.S. use his former name, and hint as his early role as a Russian-speaking fixer who brokered deals for Russian businesses. “I can recommend a savvy canadian lawyer (speaks Russian), who only for $2500 consulate fees can arrange your immigration to Canada,” Millian boasted in one.[1]

Since first meeting Trump, Millian has built a reputation on a series of exaggerations, to become a cross between a translator, a property merchant, and a pro-Trump spin doctor for the Russian press. In recent years he has evolved into a regular pundit on behalf of Trump, in Russian media, and even to The Daily Beast as recently as July, 2016.[1]
———

1980s
Trump has been seeking opportunities to develop buildings in Russia since the 1980s, during the Soviet era—none of which have been fruitful. However, they have led to a number of business connections.[1]
Trump has been promising to build a Trump Tower or hotel in Moscow for 30 years. He wrote in the “Art of the Deal” in 1987 that he visited Moscow for the first time that year, with then-wife Ivana, to scope out sites for luxury hotels he hoped to build in a joint venture with the then-Soviet government's hotel and tourism agency. He visited again with U.S. tobacco executives in 1996; that deal got far enough that an architect drew conceptual drawings but did not come to fruition.[3][4]

Part of the allure was what Trump and his associates saw as a huge opportunity — the chance to market American-style luxury apartments to the wealthy elite in a place that still mostly offered utilitarian Soviet-style construction.[4]

2005
Trump signed a one-year deal in 2005 with a New York real estate company called the Bayrock Group to try, again, to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. In a 2007 deposition, Bayrock executive Felix Sater (a Russian immigrant with an interesting mafia-related back story) testified that he had located Russian investors for the project, as well as a site, a shuttered pencil factory named for U.S. communists Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti.
Sater testified that after trips to Russia, he would “pop my head into Mr. Trump’s office and tell him, you know, ‘Moving forward on the Moscow deal.’ And he would say, ‘All right.’ ”
That effort fizzled too.[3]

Trump claimed (in a later court proceeding) that Russian investors were spooked when a 2005 book questioned his net worth.[4]

2006
Partners of one of Trump’s projects then under construction in Panama visited Moscow to sell condos at the building in 2006.[3]

The aforementioned Russian-American Chamber of Commerce (RACC), a nonprofit that Millian started in Atlanta in 2006[2], has survived on shoestring budgets, advocates closer commercial ties between Russia and the United States, and assists US firms looking to do business in Russia. Its website notes that it "facilitates cooperation for U.S. members with the Russian Government, Russian Regional Administrations, U.S. Consulates in Russia, Chambers of Commerce in Russia, and corporate leaders from CIS [Commonwealth of Independent States] countries."[2]

2007
Trump promised, in a 2007 court deposition, that he had not given up on Moscow. “Russia is one of the hottest places in the world for investment. . . . We will be in Moscow at some point,” he said.[3]

Millian's friends had organised a Trump trip to the Moscow Millionaire’s Fair in 2007, where he was promoting Trump Vodka.

According to one Moscow-based American businessman who negotiated with him, Trump’s admiration for Putin was rooted in "pure self-interest".
"He was looking to make friends and business partners” among Russia’s politically connected elite. “Oligarchs aren't going to do business with anyone who bad-mouths the boss,” explains the real estate developer, who requested anonymity because of his ongoing Russian investments.[7]

Trump then allegedly invited Millian to horse races at Gulfstream Park Racing & Casino, in Miami, Florida (pictured above).

That encounter led to a meeting with Trump attorney Michael Cohen (since implicated in the Steele Dossier) and, allegedly, an exclusive contract for dealing Trump properties in Russia and nearby nations. "Later," Millian said, "we met at his office in New York, where he introduced me to his right-hand man—Michael Cohen. He is Trump's main lawyer, all contracts go through him. Subsequently, Trump Organization and The Related Group signed a contract with me[/B] to promote one of their real estate projects in Russia and the CIS. You can say I was their exclusive broker."[1][2] Millian said he had helped Trump "study the Moscow market" for potential real estate investments.[2]

In October, Trump told Larry King on CNN, "Look at Putin -- what he's doing with Russia -- I mean, you know, what's going on over there. I mean this guy has done -- whether you like him or don't like him -- he's doing a great job in rebuilding the image of Russia and also rebuilding Russia period,"[5]

2008
“Then, in the 2007-2008 years, Russians were buying tens of apartments in Trump buildings in the U.S.A.,” Millian bragged to RIA. “But I wouldn’t want to disclose concrete sums or names.”[1][2]

Trump made significant money from one Russian oligarch in 2008, when he sold a mansion in Palm Beach for $95 million to Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev. Trump had bought the home at a bankruptcy auction less than four years earlier for $41.4 million.[3]

Donald Trump Jr. said, at a 2008 real estate conference in New York, "Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets." He added, "We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."[1][2]
The Russian market had “natural strength, especially in the high-end sector." Moscow held special appeal because wealthy people throughout the region wanted to own real estate in the capital city, he said.[4]

In his 2008 speech, Donald Jr. announced that he had traveled to Russia six times in the previous 18 months. But, he said, Russia presented enormous challenges.
“As much as we want to take our business over there, Russia is just a different world,” the younger Trump said. “It is a question of who knows who, whose brother is paying off who. . . . It really is a scary place.”[4]

Concurrently, Sergei Millian’s online biography prominently bragged that he had worked “as a broker for projects with Donald Trump.”[1]

2009
In the April 2009 issue of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce newsletter, Millian, as president, reported that he was working with Russian investors looking to buy property in the United States, and he said, "We have signed formal agreements with the Richard Bowers and Co., the Trump Organization and The Related Group to jointly service the Russian clients' commercial, residential and industrial real estate needs."[1][2]

In 2009, RACC called for the US Congress "to foster necessary political changes to produce a healthier economic environment" and grant permanent normal trade relations status to Russia.[2]

2011
RACC's 2011 tax return reported the group was based in an apartment in Astoria, Queens, where Millian lived[2]—though the group's letterhead that year listed a Wall Street address[2]—and that year it brought in only $23,300 in contributions and grants and $14,748 in program revenue. The tax return noted that the chamber "successfully hosted four universities from Russia in New York City" and hosted a trade mission from Belarus.[2]

In December, Trump praised Putin's "intelligence" and "no-nonsense way" in his book "Time to Get Tough."
"Putin has big plans for Russia. He wants to edge out its neighbors so that Russia can dominate oil supplies to all of Europe," Trump said. "I respect Putin and Russians but cannot believe our leader (Obama) allows them to get away with so much... Hats off to the Russians."[5]

2013
Trump made millions when he agreed to bring the Miss Universe pageant to Moscow in 2013, a deal financed in part by the development company of a Russian billionaire Aras Agalarov, a Putin ally who is sometimes called the “Trump of Russia” because of his tendency to put his own name on his buildings.

("Will he become my new best friend?" Trump asked of Putin in a tweet wondering whether Putin would attend—he didn't but offered him a traditional gift.[6]

At the time, Trump mingled with the Russian business elite at a swanky after-party. “Almost all of the oligarchs were in the room,” Trump bragged to Real Estate Weekly on returning home.[4]

Agalarov told The Washington Post that the project is on hold while Trump runs for president.[3]

Agalarov's son, Russian pop musician Emin Agalarov, said, “He kept saying, ‘Every time there is friction between United States and Russia, it’s bad for both countries. For the people to benefit, this should be fixed. We should be friends,’ ” Emin Agalarov recalled.[4]

The Agalarovs are wealthy developers who have received several contracts for (although not yet made money from) state-funded construction projects, a sign of their closeness to the Putin government. Shortly after the pageant, Putin awarded the elder Agalarov the “Order of Honor of the Russian Federation,” a prestigious designation[4] (an award coincidentally also received by Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson, that same year).[6]

2014
Millian apparently was proud of his association with Trump. In 2014, he posted on Facebook a photograph of him with Trump and Jorge Perez, the billionaire real estate developer in Miami who owns The Related Group. (Pictured above, photographed in 2007)

2015
In 2015, Millian received a Russian award for fostering cooperation between US and Russian businesses.[2]

Putin said in December that Trump was a “colorful and talented” person, a compliment that Trump said at the time was an “honour.”[4]

2016 (April)
On Millian's LinkedIn page, he notes he is also the vice president of an outfit called the World Chinese Merchants Union Association, a group that has only a slight presence on the internet and that seems to have an address in Beijing. According to a LinkedIn post published by Millian in April 2016, he met that month in Beijing with a Chinese official and the Russian ambassador to the Republic of San Marino to discuss industrial and commercial cooperation between China and Russia.[2]

Millian bragged about being an exclusive broker with the Trump Organization to promote their properties in Russia. In a lengthy interview with RIA News, a Russian language outlet, in April, Millian boasted about instantly winning Trump’s affection at the Moscow Millionaire’s Fair in 2007. Millian said he’d been in contact with Trump or an adviser a few days prior.

When RIA News asked him this year about fears that America might go up in flames in the case of a Trump presidency, Millian remained a true believer.
But the April interview was unusual in that it focused on Millian’s supposed personal relationship with Trump. Typically, he’s billed as a political scientist or economics expert when he spins for Trump.
In one article billing him as an “expert,” Millian waxed about how Trump’s economic reform will be based on Americanism, not globalism, and parrotted the Republican nominee’s talk about keeping jobs in the U.S.[1]

In the interview, Millian asserted that Trump would be good for Russia if elected president. Trump, he noted, would improve US relations with Russia and lift economic sanctions imposed by Washington on Russia. He said Trump was interested in doing business in Russia: "I don't want to reveal [Trump's] position, but he is keeping Moscow in his sights and is waiting for an appropriate time." Millian added, "In general Trump has a very positive attitude to Russians, because he sees them as clients for his business. Incidentally, he has done many projects with people from the Russian-language diaspora. For example, Trump SoHo in New York with billionaire Tamir Sapir." (Sapir, who died in 2014, was an American billionaire real estate developer from the former Soviet republic of Georgia.)[2]

The Russian Ambassador to the United States, Sergey I. Kislyak, attended Trump’s April foreign policy speech in which Trump called for ending “this horrible cycle of hostility” between the two nations (breaking from a tradition in which diplomats steer clear of domestic politics).
A spokesman for the Russian Embassy said that the Ambassador's attendance at the Trump speech should not be considered an indication that Russia is partial to Trump. “There is no preference,” the spokesman said.[4]

Emin Agalarov said, "[Trump] keeps underlining that he thinks President Putin is a strong leader. This could be an amazing breakthrough. If he becomes president and actually becomes friends with Putin, we would avoid 10 wars every year at least."

2016 (June)
In another article in June, Millian speaks authoritatively about how Trump’s friendships will dictate his choice of a vice presidential candidate.
“Trump mostly interacts with business or military people,” he said. “That’s why his vice-president will be a representative of one of these two camps: either someone who came from the corporate world, or the military.”[1]

2016 (July)
“Donald Trump is ‘presidential’, powerful, charismatic, and highly intelligent leader with realistic approach towards Russia. I’m am glad to see Donald taking control of GOP,” Millian said last month during the Republican National Convention, after The Daily Beast reached out to the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce.
“I, personally, wholeheartedly support his presidential aspirations. It’s been a great pleasure representing Mr Trump’s projects in Russia
“I think he will be able to improve some processes in the government, because it’s currently very bureaucratic,” he said. “For instance, this concerns medicine. In the USA people smile at you well, but the level of accessibility and wait time here is behind many countries.”
In July, when many in Russia worried Trump’s vice presidential choice in Mike Pence might threaten Trump’s warm embrace of the country, Millian praised the Indiana governor an “excellent candidate.”
“He works well in his post and gets by without scandals,” Millian said then. “Opponents will find it hard to find fault in his reputation and work.”[1]

2016 (August)
With escalating media interest in Trump’s ties with Russia, Millian dismisses his dealings as almost a side gig. Millian told The Daily Beast last week he had not spoken to Trump since 2008.[1]
After inquiries from The Daily Beast, the reference to Trump in his biography was scrubbed.[1]
It also appears that references to the Trump Organization working with the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce in the USA were at some point scraped from its website.[1][2]

He has recently played down his relationship with Trump. There had been “quite negative press related to Russia so I don’t want to be involved,” he told The Daily Beast when first reached by phone. “I didn’t represent him personally ever,” he continued, saying that he had merely worked with him on some projects.
“There are several brokers who work on such real estate projects… I do remember there was a written agreement that authorized me to market one of the projects bearing his name signed somewhere around 2008.”
He praised Trump’s knowledge of other cultures by noting he offered him a glass of champagne upon closing a business deal—a nod to the notion that Russians like to drink.[1]

It was a Trump-like move: brag about ties to a project when it could be advantageous; but then brand it as tangential any link to the project if it starts to show sign of controversy.[1]

2016 (October)
In October, the Financial Times mounted an investigation of him and the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce. It reported:

Most of the board members are obscure entities and nearly half of their telephone numbers went unanswered when called by the Financial Times. An FT reporter found no trace of the Chamber of Commerce at the Wall Street address listed on its website. At the same time, the chamber appears to have close official ties, arranging trips for visiting Russian regional governors to the US. [2]



———
SOME BACKSTORY: YURY ZAYTSEV & ROSSOTRUDNICHESTVO
As part of its inquiry into Millian, the Financial Times pointed to Millian's connection to Rossotrudnichestvo, a Russian government organization that promotes Russian culture abroad. Millian has collaborated with Rossotrudnichestvo.

Through cultural exchanges, Rossotrudnichestvo, which operates under the jurisdiction of the Russian Foreign Ministry, was bringing young Americans—including political aides, nonprofit advocates, and business executives—on trips to Russia. The program was run by Yury Zaytsev, a Russian diplomat who headed the Russian Cultural Center in Washington, DC.

2011
In 2011, Millian (and the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce) worked with Zaytsev and the Russian group to mount a 10-day exchange that brought 50 entrepreneurs to the first "Russian-American Business Forum" in Moscow and the Vladimir region, according to a letter Millian sent to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev after the initiative. In that letter, Millian praised Rossotrudnichestvo, and he added, "My entire staff, fellow participants, and I, here at the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce in the USA, very much look forward to assisting Rossotrudnichestvo with the preparations for next year's trip." (Millian now says, "We are not affiliated with [Rossotrudnichestvo] in any way.")

2013
In 2013, Mother Jones reported that Rossotrudnichestvo was under investigation by the FBI for using junkets to recruit American assets for Russian intelligence.

Americans who participated in the exchange trips and were later questioned by FBI agents told Mother Jones that the agents' questions indicated the FBI suspected Zaytsev and Rossotrudnichestvo had been using the all-expenses-paid trips to Russia to cultivate Americans as intelligence assets. (An asset could be a person who directly works with an intelligence service to gather information, or merely a contact who provides information, opinions, or gossip, not realizing it is being collected by an intelligence officer.)

After Mother Jones published a story on the FBI investigation, the Russian embassy in Washington issued a statement: "All such 'scaring information' very much resembles Cold War era. A blunt tentative is made to distort and to blacken activities of the Russian Cultural Center in DC, which are aimed at developing mutual trust and cooperation between our peoples and countries."

2014
A year later, in November 2014, Zaytsev spoke at a Moscow press conference and said, in reference to the upcoming US presidential elections, "It seems to me that the Russian 'card' will certainly be played out." He added, "I think that this presidential election first of all will very clearly show a trend of further development" in US-Russia relations.

OP, you made it to WSJ. If you haven't already sent all this information to them, you should. http://www.wsj.com/articles/key-cla...ian-american-business-group-source-1485253804
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom