I think IGN was saying that. It's very unlikely. It's going to be announced early 2016 with a presumably holiday 2016 releaseJust read this is supposed to be out next summer?
Surely they would have shown something by now?
So they could make bundle in both for like $400? It all depends on what Nintendo wants to do, I guess. You can probably make a portable more powerful than the Vita with a normal screen at $170. I imagine they'll want to go for 200 which is the current 3DS price. No more than that.
As for the home console, not sure if they want to go for PS4/X1 specs. Maybe Wii U level with a better CPU for 250? Or maybe closer to Ps4 for that price? Not sure how achievable that is by next year or whenever it launches.
Yeah, would be an interesting tactic if they do include the touch screen controller again. Not entirely sure if it's wise. I really like the gamepad but if it's that expensive then it might not be worth it. Though I imagine they tech has gone down in price a bit and they can probably put effort into making a cheaper oneIt should all be about affordability. I think they can have an ARM based "WiiU 2.0" for $250 and an ARM based "Vita 2.0" for $150 - $200. But NCL will do best by trying for the $150 - $170 pricetag. The bundle wouldn't be such a bad idea either, especially if the handheld can double as a controller for the console.
Yeah, would be an interesting tactic if they do include the touch screen controller again. Not entirely sure if it's wise. I really like the gamepad but if it's that expensive then it might not be worth it. Though I imagine they tech has gone down in price a bit and they can probably put effort into making a cheaper one
I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if the Gamepad, in a smaller form factor, becomes the next Nintendo handheld.
That's because the 3DS as a platform was already on the decline, & the n3DS came in too late. Timing a refresh for the NX line of systems would alleviate this, & would be necessary anyway if Nintendo wants the NX Platform to be the only dedicated gaming platform for Nintendo systems going forward (so they won't have to start from zero each time).
If they were to do that, they'd have to also provide a version of the Gamepad that wasn't the handheld. A handheld is too expensive to buy just as a controller.
I was thinking about including an NFC version of an improve Pro controller with the console. That way, it could be - NX Home + improved NFC Pro Controller for $250. NX Go (that can double as a controller) for $150.
People don't need phones every two years either. They just get caught up in the consumerist cycle of being told they can have a 'free' phone when in fact they're paying for the phone with massively inflated contract prices.
So people are conditioned to think they want new phones. So why wouldn't that be a potential model for consoles too?
As far as 5 year cycles and whatnot, I suppose I am pessimistic in that I can see NX being probably the second to last generation of traditional consoles from Nintendo. I can see them studying Steam and eventually transforming themselves completely into a software platform, still with their own controllers and other goodies, of course. They might offer optimized hardware, but they would basically be standard hardware like Steam machines positioned for different price ranges and form factors, if that is even viable (might be a more low-volume enthusiast type deal).
Even now they are experimenting with different software development methods, such as Web Framework. NX will bring more of this as Takeda has stated that they are working to adopt industry standards into their own development environment, while relying less on their in-house tools.
http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/stock/meeting/140627qa/03.html
http://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/141030qa/03.html
Personally, I think that the "one machine" thing was something of a response to hybrid speculation. That entire thing kind of read to me as "we'll start with console and handheld, but will add or subtract form factors as the market demands".
I think you may be misreading Nintendo's stance on hardware a bit. If you look at quotes like this one in particular:
It seems pretty clear that they still view their dedicated hardware as the main event and that everything else is meant to feed into that. The increase in availability for NNID across platforms seems to be more of a way to keep their connection with their customers open through any hardware that the customer has.
Also, Nintendo has detailed in the past how they view their software and hardware development as closely related. This is how we've ended up with features like StreetPass, for example.
Thinking that Nintendo is essentially already calling it quits with hardware at this point is an overly pessimistic reading of the situation. Sure, the moves they've made will help cushion the blow if that happens, but I don't think that that is their intention.
Nintendo would make more money if people are buying one or two games more than a new hardware revision. The profit margin of a console is paper thin at best.
Also the retailers would sure lobe it if they must get rid of their consoles every two years.
I don't think there are reasons to overthink this, really. They clearly said what model they're pursuing: iOS. Steam is quite different from that, especially in some key aspects, and i don't see Nintendo ever changing those.
i think what happens with nintendo after nx depends on what happens to the dedicated market after this gen. i look at the dedicated market and i see it as one that is no longer growing. not just from a consumer perspective, but from a matter of presence at retail, amount of games released, up-and-coming publishers, and new franchises. so what is the lasting effect and what does it mean in five years? what does it mean in ten? it seems increasingly pointless to have a box-to-a-tv setup or a dedicated handheld unless you're part of the main demographic the industry largely targets, you're older, have lots of disposable income, and/or are an enthusiast.
something like steam machines seem like very primitive versions of what the marketplace will be years from now, where first-parties might use their os/cloud services to turn their platform into something that's playable on multiple devices, with perhaps one offered from the first-party directly. sony seems to want playstation now to be that kind of thing, and nx seems theoretically poised to be that kind of platform as well (in a very controlled way).
This isn't quite the same as the handheld being used as just a controller, but I'd love to see local multiplayer between the console and the handheld: player vs. player with different views on different screens. It's one of the best things the Wii U pulled off, for my money.Assuming a single screened handheld, we have a lot of past evidence that such a setup would not be meaningfully utilized.
Assuming a dual screened handheld, that severely hinders developers' ability to make meaningful uses of the handheld's second screen.
If the feature isn't available out of the box for everyone, then it will barely be used, if at all.
My premise was more, "What do Nintendo do if a generation or so goes by and NX hardware does not sell?" It's really in response to some of the going 3rd party talk from a couple pages back. Similar to what AniHawk posted:
It was a response to hybrid speculation. And the future I am speculating on is what would come if the market does not any longer respond to their hardware.
That's not what I was saying at all. Of course Iwata was optimistic on their chances to bounce back in the NX generation. He was also a man very observant of overall trends in technology and media consumption. If you read my original comment, I said NX could very well be their second to last traditional hardware generation. Honestly, it may even be their last if things really tank hard. My point was that some of the things Nintendo are doing now could potentially set themselves up for a smoother transition into becoming a virtual platform holder and it might not even clash so much with their traditional philosophies. You mentioned StreetPass. That could be a mobile app and reach millions more people.
I'm looking at the future of consoles in general, not just Nintendo, although if things keep going the way they are, they will be forced to transition their business before the others do. They have already shown that they are open to major policy changes. It's getting hard to justify dedicated hardware outside the circle of elite gamers. There are too many other options out there for the mainstream audience which are getting to be almost as good (and, in the case of PC, much better). I'd personally give it another generation after the current, but change is inevitable in the market.
In October. Well, I think so. Could be later but I'm pretty sure they said they will show it off this yearKind of off topic but when do you guys think we'll hear about the Club Nintendo successor?
Plus the input lag....*shutters*Games becoming a service is terrifying to me. We'll be fucked over from every direction.
Plus the input lag....*shutters*
So like Street Fighter V?Games being a service doesn't mean streaming, streaming is just one form "games as a service" has taken.
So like Street Fighter V?
Kind of off topic but when do you guys think we'll hear about the Club Nintendo successor?
That would make sense. Maybe it'll give us more insight on what to expect from the NX Platform. So far we're only been able to make educated guesses based on interviews & patents. It'll be nice to get some more concrete information.Don't they have an investors meeting late October? Probably there.
That would make sense. Maybe it'll give us more insight on what to expect from the NX Platform. So far we're only been able to make educated guesses based on interviews & patents. It'll be nice to get some more concrete information.
The most I would expect is them to assure their investors that NX is still on track and that they would talk about it next year.
https://www.khronos.org/members/contributors/nintendo-co.-ltd
Nintendo is now member of the Khronos Group. The Khronos Group is well known for the OpenGL API and the anticipated Vulkan API.
That's a good idea, will start saving hahaI've got 500 quid set aside for NX next year now, so hopefully that'll get me a console with a couple of games.
at least one SKU of it better be out next year too
https://www.khronos.org/members/contributors/nintendo-co.-ltd
Nintendo is now member of the Khronos Group. The Khronos Group is well known for the OpenGL API and the anticipated Vulkan API.
Traditionally a Console does not need an abstraction layer like the OpenGL or Vulkan API, since you can already code to the "metal" anyway.
This heavily hints that the NX Platform will be indeed hardware agnostic - just like Android or even Windows 10!
Yupso Six months later are the only HARD FACTs about this platform still:
It's a dedicated Gaming platform that they hope to talk about more in 2016?
so Six months later are the only HARD FACTs about this platform still:
It's a dedicated Gaming device that they hope to talk about more in 2016?
https://www.khronos.org/members/contributors/nintendo-co.-ltd
Nintendo is now member of the Khronos Group. The Khronos Group is well known for the OpenGL API and the anticipated Vulkan API.
Traditionally a Console does not need an abstraction layer like the OpenGL or Vulkan API, since you can already code to the "metal" anyway.
This heavily hints that the NX Platform will be indeed hardware agnostic - just like Android or even Windows 10!
so Six months later are the only HARD FACTs about this platform still:
It's a dedicated Gaming device that they hope to talk about more in 2016?
A couple things to keep in mind. Khronos also manages WebGL, so it is possible that Nintendo is only interested in that. Also, I'm pretty sure Nintendo already has their own graphics API that they could use.
A couple things to keep in mind. Khronos also manages WebGL, so it is possible that Nintendo is only interested in that. Also, I'm pretty sure Nintendo already has their own graphics API that they could use.
https://www.khronos.org/members/contributors/nintendo-co.-ltd
Nintendo is now member of the Khronos Group. The Khronos Group is well known for the OpenGL API and the anticipated Vulkan API.
Traditionally a Console does not need an abstraction layer like the OpenGL or Vulkan API, since you can already code to the "metal" anyway.
This heavily hints that the NX Platform will be indeed hardware agnostic - just like Android or even Windows 10!
https://www.khronos.org/members/contributors/nintendo-co.-ltd
Nintendo is now member of the Khronos Group. The Khronos Group is well known for the OpenGL API and the anticipated Vulkan API.
Traditionally a Console does not need an abstraction layer like the OpenGL or Vulkan API, since you can already code to the "metal" anyway.
This heavily hints that the NX Platform will be indeed hardware agnostic - just like Android or even Windows 10!
Their Wii U graphics API, GX2, is heavily influenced by OpenGL. So, it could be they just want to keep a closer eye on what's going on as they develop the follow up API for NX. But Takeda has talked about adopting more industry standards (vs using in house tools), so maybe Vulkan is a possibility.
so Six months later are the only HARD FACTs about this platform still:
It's a dedicated Gaming device that they hope to talk about more in 2016?
Vulkan or a compatible derivative thereof would make a lot of sense, since Vulkan is key to the future of mobile graphics as well.
Pretty much.
A Pokemon Company rep let slip that it would have cloud functionality, a few patents have come out that may or may not apply to the NX.