topsyturvy said:
What you don't understand is what she stated numerous times, either you guys are ignoring it or you people just doesn't know the facts. The resolution she signed transfers the responsibility, the authority, and the power of the Congress to the President so he can declare war when and if he wants to.
What makes you think we don't understand that? I already addressed that poor cop-out of an excuse and explained why it doesn't change anything. Claiming that I don't understand an argument that I've already shredded makes you look like a stuttering fool.
Having swallowed Hillary's campaign talking points whole, are you unable to actually digest them?
heres another link to back that up, But again, im sure you'll find something to find against her.
linky
You keep throwing links that reiterate the same single point over and over, despite having already been rebutted.
I thought I was being clear enough before, but I'll go the extra mile and spell this out for you:
Hillary voted to give Bush the power to go to war. Either she did so for what she believed would be political advantage, or she did so based on poor judgment and naive faith in Bush.
Neither possibility casts her in a good light.
By the way, in case you couldn't tell, the question in my last post was rhetorical. When you get called out on an excuse by fucking
Wolf Blitzer, who probably has the least testicles of any journalist on TV, you know that your bullshit must really stink. Her excuse, the very one you keep parroting all over this thread, does not fly with anyone capable of critical thinking.