Ol No Bones
Banned
E3 2014 may have had a lot of leaks in the Xbox camp beforehand but either way they had a damn good E3.Many said that before last years and it was dross, predictable crap.
E3 2014 may have had a lot of leaks in the Xbox camp beforehand but either way they had a damn good E3.Many said that before last years and it was dross, predictable crap.
He was part of the last group...
He even played in the battle of the bands...
Nice interview.
They mentioned Marty O'Donnell and Joe Staten when discussing the Halo doc.
I gotta believe Marty and Joe are involved in Halo 5 some way. They have to be!
Joe is already employed by Microsoft and Marty is a free agent, it's definitely possible.
That's way too packed for Fall. That would be horrible if they do that.
so he was part of the top management and not responsible for/involved in the decisions made?I think we all know he was apart of that last group. We also know he was following orders. I think it's undeniable he has a different focus for Xbox than the last group.
are you denying that they are not bleeding money in order to stay competitive?
They had to drop the system in price a second time just to get me to purchase it
I know this is a praise phil thread, but he comes across like he is always hiding something, only time will tell though
If I remember correctly, Joe is supposed to be helping on any Microsoft Studios project in regards to the story as he's the Senior Creative Director so there's a chance he's taken a look at Halo 5 as well as Scalebound and Crackdown.
As for Marty, I don't know if he would come back to Halo exclusively after working on it for so long. I could see him doing a song or two though as a guest appearance.
I'll believe it when I see it.
They've been saying they have more to say on Windows gaming since 2006, so glad to see they will deliver next year. /s
Yep. I'm done hoping that Microsoft ever treats PC gaming as anything serious ever again. It's been too long and too many "more coming soon" statements over the past decade. I'll only believe it when I actually see it now, not hear it.
Pretty much, Forza 6 is coming next year.Forza 2 was late on 360, due in 2006 ended up coming out in mid-2007 but apart from that Forza has always been on time, I don't expect that to change now. Turn10 are a machine
Phil talks about how they moved on for Holiday 2015 and E3 2015. He said next Fall will be crazy and doesn't even know how they will ship all the games they are planning for the Fall. Said it was possible that they might have to move some games so they wouldn't be overcrowding (starts around 36:15).
Pretty much, Forza 6 is coming next year.
LOL, sure thing Phil.
I think the guy talks a very good talk, but I'm not sure about much beyond that. Will be an interesting couple of years, for sure.
Yeah, I can't see them breaking away from the "every two years" schedule. They seem pretty comfortable with it. Hoping for some big changes -- liked Forza 5 but thought it was disappointing too. Night and weather racing better be in there.
To be fair it wasn't Phil saying it all those times ; )
The decisions where right, overdue and completely obvious to make.He's made some very important decisions in the last 7 months... it's more than just talk.
Yeah but I also don't want it to get mixed up with the loads of games coming Holiday 2015. I mean Uncharted, Halo, tomb raider, COD, Battlefront, and more unannounced heavy hitters I'm sure.I really like him and feel much better about Xbox with him in charge than the last group (who clearly didn't get it).
I'm still hoping Phantom Dust makes it out next year.
The decisions where right, overdue and completely obvious to make.
no mistakes so far, but no miracles either....
Not sure who is expecting a miracle within 7 months, I'd like to know.
so he was part of the top management and not responsible for/involved in the decisions made?
What a dream job....
Exactly what I say. He did the obvious stuff, and nor even record-breakingly fast. He made the Xbox technically (no kinect) and philosophicly (gamesgamesgames) a me-too-product and let the already set-in-stone timeline of heavy-hitting games work for him.Not sure who is expecting a miracle within 7 months, I'd like to know.
The people who have the power to make the ultimate decisions are the ones who bear the ultimate responsibility. This is just basic level concepts.
Exactly what I say. He did the obvious stuff, and nor even record-breakingly fast. He made the Xbox technically (no kinect) and philosophicly (gamesgamesgames) a me-too-product and let the already set-in-stone timeline of heavy-hitting games work for him.
that is all fine and in my opinion the 100% correct way to do it. but it is no masterpiece of insight or management quality.
Okay, you got me. I have never been on the top management level of a multinational billion-dollar-company. sorry to state my opinion. i am always grateful to get deep first-hand insights from experts. and to refresh my vocabulary. dolt. I have to remember that.what the fuck (...) You clearly have zero experience (...) You just sound like a dolt (...)
so he was part of the top management and not responsible for/involved in the decisions made?
What a dream job....
what the fuck kind of comment is this? You do know that their is a hierarchy of authority. You clearly have zero experience in a business or management setting. He would be responsible for what he was in charge of, namely securing content for MS. You just sound like a dolt claiming that he was secretly in power and could have done anything he wanted for a project the was Don's baby. The people who have the power to make the ultimate decisions are the ones who bear the ultimate responsibility. This is just basic level concepts.
Subordinate team members can voice their input, but cannot control projects. If you speak up too loudly against what the lead wants, you even risk losing your job sometimes. The person who bears all the responsibility for decisions is the head. In this case, Don Mattrick. If you listen to Phil in his recent interview on IGN, he explains that somethings he may have done different if he had the power, but because of the power of hindsight, it is difficult to say.
Exactly what I say. He did the obvious stuff, and nor even record-breakingly fast. He made the Xbox technically (no kinect) and philosophicly (gamesgamesgames) a me-too-product and let the already set-in-stone timeline of heavy-hitting games work for him.
that is all fine and in my opinion the 100% correct way to do it. but it is no masterpiece of insight or management quality.
Okay, you got me. I have never been on the top management level of a multinational billion-dollar-company. sorry to state my opinion. i am always grateful to get deep first-hand insights from experts. and to refresh my vocabulary. dolt. I have to remember that.
back to topic. always thought that those decisions were made using old school tool like meetings and discussions, consulting marketers shareholders, technicians and fortune tellers. but it seems that i was wrong and it was all the Don alone, sitting in his ivory tower, doors locked and not listening to spencer, who knew the truth and mourned and griefed.
what a blessing that the tyrant is gone now.
It's nice to spew 20/20 bs. We've seen plenty of companies in gaming not make that so "obvious choice." We've also seen changes take allot longer to implement.
I totally trust Phil... I hope he brings Xbox back to glory days (ie Halo 2 and early 360 days zomg).
Right now they have a very tough battle and I think it is OK for them to come in a strong second place finish behind PS4... just keep the focus on games and driving down price and the gamers will come.
Okay, I got taken away by the fun of discussing things. did not want it to end in tears. apologise for any bad mood.
last things last:
I am sure that MS is not stupid. And I am sure that they already saw what was happening in the console race pretty soon after launch. The word of mouth, the sales numbers, the image problem - you name it. All problems condensed down to don mattricks sad face. he had to go, even if he saw the mistakes and took the right conclusions. people can learn of their faults. really. anyway, his name was burned.
But do you really think they throw out mattrick, install spencer and tell him: hey, surprise you are the new boss -- start thinking?
I am sure that all those decisions for the better were already made and prepared before spencer took over and were a pretty nice gift to get a good start. and it worked so far.
Kinect? we rip it off!
TVTV? From now on it's just games.
And, as we all know, the heavy focus on games and the classy line-up coming in must have been planned already a few years in advance, not just 7 months.
so it must have been mattricks success.
But, you say, spencer was head of this department.
Yeah, but he could not decide anything anyway (so I learned).
Okay, I got taken away by the fun of discussing things. did not want it to end in tears. apologise for any bad mood.
last things last:
I am sure that MS is not stupid. And I am sure that they already saw what was happening in the console race pretty soon after launch. The word of mouth, the sales numbers, the image problem - you name it. All problems condensed down to don mattricks sad face. he had to go, even if he saw the mistakes and took the right conclusions. people can learn of their faults. really. anyway, his name was burned.
But do you really think they throw out mattrick, install spencer and tell him: hey, surprise you are the new boss -- start thinking?
I am sure that all those decisions for the better were already made and prepared before spencer took over and were a pretty nice gift to get a good start. and it worked so far.
Kinect? we rip it off!
TVTV? From now on it's just games.
And, as we all know, the heavy focus on games and the classy line-up coming in must have been planned already a few years in advance, not just 7 months.
so it must have been mattricks success.
But, you say, spencer was head of this department.
Yeah, but he could not decide anything anyway (so I learned).
E3 2014 may have had a lot of leaks in the Xbox camp beforehand but either way they had a damn good E3.
It was just so predictable, they all were. In terms of announcements it was a poor E3 all round imo
A FULL Halo collection, which is a tremendous undertaking versus a Halo 2 Anniversary alone, and Scalebound were not predictable.
It was just so predictable, they all were. In terms of announcements it was a poor E3 all round imo
Platinum doing an exclusive was widely predicted in advance.
Who are these shareholders? Honest question.I'm curious, share holders weren't happy with the XBO division so i don't think they're taking all of the money that's beeing burned in trying to correct the ship too kindly, i hope it's not a sin to wonder about such things?...
Platinum doing an exclusive was widely predicted in advance.
You can tell. Really glad they gave them the opportunity. A gaming landscape without Sunset is a poor, barren, lifeless one.
Phil talks about working with Ted Price. Glad that Insomniac was able to make a game they wanted.
I think you're right in that some of these decisions were being made before Mattrick left, but I think it was in the sense that they asked maybe Spencer, maybe someone else or a whole committee setting what the best choices moving forward were. They likely felt that the Kinect and TV thing, while they were good ideas, weren't what the brand was necessarily known for. Ever since the changeover, the realigning to games, games, games has started building up good graces again, and Spencer at the head is good faith.
It's actually very likely that Spencer may have been in charge unofficially when everyone internally knew Mattrick was leaving -- just because Spencer was announced Head of Xbox publically doesn't necessarily mean that that's when he first started that role. There was likely, I presume, a transition process. Unless there's evidence to the contrary, I think Spencer was in charge of turning the Xbox brand around. I mean, I own both consoles, so I don't think it's an unfair statement to say that Sony obviously started off extremely strong but I think Microsoft has had by far the better post launch support. Obviously, Spencer is not doing his job out of the goodness of his heart -- he is still part of a business -- but it's also easy to see that he is still very much passionate about games and his leadership of the Xbox brand since he got the position definitely attests to that.
He was part of the last group...
He even played in the battle of the bands...
It's actually very likely that Spencer may have been in charge unofficially when everyone internally knew Mattrick was leaving -- just because Spencer was announced Head of Xbox publically doesn't necessarily mean that that's when he first started that role. There was likely, I presume, a transition process. Unless there's evidence to the contrary, I think Spencer was in charge of turning the Xbox brand around. I mean, I own both consoles, so I don't think it's an unfair statement to say that Sony obviously started off extremely strong but I think Microsoft has had by far the better post launch support. Obviously, Spencer is not doing his job out of the goodness of his heart -- he is still part of a business -- but it's also easy to see that he is still very much passionate about games and his leadership of the Xbox brand since he got the position definitely attests to that.
fair enough. I know this situation with incompetent leaders and cowardly devote management below. that's why i left for a better place.Have you worked somewhere where you were not in charge? It can be a real challenge to change things if everyone else is drinking the cool-aid. If he was a believer is some of the things they wanted to do you wouldn't guess that now, based on actions not words.
Phil Spencer said:Talks about gaming on Windows. Will have more to say in 2015