There was a crossover on the Netflix Skylanders show.
What is Spyro doing in that screenshot?
There was a crossover on the Netflix Skylanders show.
Just those three, huh?
Explain MGS4, then.
There was a crossover on the Netflix Skylanders show.
They got CoD and Destiny this fall though. Can see it being early 2018 for the other consoles.
Xbox and PC sure, Switch who knows. Some third party titles doesn't seem to make its way to Switch. This one would make sense but who knows.
C'mon, parents normally buy skylanders for their young children at christmas, no sane company would just pass on that opportunity.They got CoD and Destiny this fall though. Can see it being early 2018 for the other consoles.
This seems likely for Switch. It's a genre that sells well on Nintendo hardware and is more family friendly.Xbox and PC sure, Switch who knows. Some third party titles doesn't seem to make its way to Switch. This one would make sense but who knows.
The industry at large? Healthy companies are good for all.
Monopolies ain't
At this point it is blatant fanboyism
And then PC only? It would be cool for Xbox owners to play the trilogy, but it'll be strange seeing original PS1 exclusives available on Xbox.
The industry at large? Healthy companies are good for all.
Monopolies ain't
At this point it is blatant fanboyism
Funny you asked about it, here is quote from Kojima:Just those three, huh?
Explain MGS4, then.
"I'm sorry to say an Xbox 360 version isn't being released, because an Xbox 360 version of MGS4 hasn't gone on sale," Kojima told Kotaku. "To explain the situation, the amount of data in MGS4 is just too enormous."
"When it's the next console, maybe we can release it," added Kojima. "If we released a version on the Xbox 360 without MGS4, then it's not the Legacy Collection."
I wish this moneyhatting shit would go away. Paying for timed exclusives is just lame. I own both consoles, but sucks for people who only have one of them.
It's gonna hit Switch and Xbox one and probably pc.
Acti always seems to push the consoles first and then pc if it has the time resources. A lot of what can be classified kid fare usually never made it to pc.
Glad to see its not exclusive though.
I'm fine with timed exclusives but situations like Destiny waiting one year on timed DLC is basically Bungie/Activision taking a big dump on part of their customer base.
Diablo 3 has the XB1 version announced like 3 months before launch IIRC.
You're right, somehow I thought they announced it in August. I stand corrected.
Well, thanks for proving my point.
"All companies should succeed" is what someone economically ignorant would say.
Lol.
Production would have been cost prohibitive.
Oh yeah for sure PC is most likely and Switch the least likely. Just the fact that it's Activision (decently supportive of Nintendo consoles in past) and a 3D platformer with wide appeal to different age groups should make it a compelling ideal.
I'd rather timed exclusive DLC that only a fraction of the audience cares about then timed exclusive releases. It doesn't really benefit anyone from a consumer standpoint.
The game that didn't go to the 360 because it would require 7 discs? Not sure what your point is here, it had nothing to do with "hurr Durr going exclusive gives us more sales hurr durrrrrrrr".Just those three, huh?
Explain MGS4, then.
Mgs4 was moneyhatted, even Sony said so at the time that there was a deal, though they said like it was a timed.Just those three, huh?
Explain MGS4, then.
Even funnier that you believe Kojima's PR speak to be the actual truth.Funny you asked about it, here is quote from Kojima:
This is sad,I'm glad I'm just a gamer and not a fanboy.Like so:
I bought a PS4. So I'm invested in the PS brand.
I don't have an Xbox One. Therefore, I'm not invested in that brand.
People thinking they need to buy a PS4 to play the Crash remakes is better for me, because that means more money for the brand I'm invested in, and thus more/better services that brand can offer to me.
Crash remakes being available on XB1/Switch (competitors) would mean less money for the brand I'm invested in, and more for the brands that I'm not. Not sure why I'd want that for these particular games.
Financially, some games are better off as exclusives. Gears being kept exclusive to 360 when going multi platform was an option is a good example of this.
Basic economics really, but uh, I guess "fanboy" is easier for children to grasp
The game that didn't go to the 360 because it would require 7 discs? Not sure what your point is here, it had nothing to do with "hurr Durr going exclusive gives us more sales hurr durrrrrrrr".
I would think that Sony locked this up for a year, with Switch/XB1/PC coming next summer.
So, you saying that Kojima lied about real reason why MGS4 never showed up on Xbox 360, and the real reason is?...Even funnier that you believe Kojima's PR speak to be the actual truth.
What else is the guy who promotes Blu-ray in his very game supposed to say?
But:PC's fine I guess, but I hope this doesn't come to Xbox/Nintendo.
These particular games are so integral to PS' history that it'd be a terrible look for the brand if they were playable on competitor consoles. Same reason I'd prefer not to see Gears come to PlayStation (back when Epic owned the rights & that was totally possible).
Too much. No one will fall for this.Activision just shot themselves in the foot.
I don't know how much the rest of you know about American culture (I'm an expert), but honor and shame are huge parts of it. It's not like it is in Japan where you can become successful by being an asshole. If you screw someone over in America, you bring shame to yourself, and the only way to get rid of that shame is repentance.
What this means is the American public, after hearing about this, is not going to want to purchase Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy for either system, nor will they purchase any of Activision's games. This is HUGE. You can laugh all you want, but Activision has alienated an entire market with this move.
Activision, publicly apologize and cancel Crash Bandicoot N. Sane Trilogy for other systems or you can kiss your business goodbye.
Like so:
I bought a PS4. So I'm invested in the PS brand.
I don't have an Xbox One. Therefore, I'm not invested in that brand.
People thinking they need to buy a PS4 to play the Crash remakes is better for me, because that means more money for the brand I'm invested in, and thus more/better services that brand can offer to me.
Crash remakes being available on XB1/Switch (competitors) would mean less money for the brand I'm invested in, and more for the brands that I'm not. Not sure why I'd want that for these particular games.
Financially, some games are better off as exclusives. Gears being kept exclusive to 360 when going multi platform was an option is a good example of this.
Basic economics really, but uh, I guess "fanboy" is easier for children to grasp
Mgs4 was moneyhatted, even Sony said so at the time that there was a deal, though they said like it was a timed.
This is very confusing.... I always thought Crash was exclusive to Sony...
So apparently Xbox One and Switch will get it too now?
Have you been in a coma since the early 2000s?
This is very confusing.... I always thought Crash was exclusive to Sony...
So apparently Xbox One and Switch will get it too now?
This is very confusing.... I always thought Crash was exclusive to Sony...
So apparently Xbox One and Switch will get it too now?