SmartWaffles
Member
So I finished the game this weekend. There's a bunch in the story that makes no sense, but most of all, why is Hatch bulletproof in his body but not in his face?
You even sure he took the "shot"?
So I finished the game this weekend. There's a bunch in the story that makes no sense, but most of all, why is Hatch bulletproof in his body but not in his face?
So I finished the game this weekend. There's a bunch in the story that makes no sense, but most of all, why is Hatch bulletproof in his body but not in his face?
Read the emails. The story makes a lot more sense after reading them. I would also suggest reading more of this thread.
That's not really what happened. He wasn't suddenly allowed to be saved for some reason. The brother never died in the first place.The thing that killed me was stressing through the whole game that the timeline couldn't be altered, but then Jack's brother being allowed to survive because Jack didn't technically see it happen. I hate stupid time paradox stories and that was just the worst of the worst.
That's not really what happened. He wasn't suddenly allowed to be saved for some reason. The brother never died in the first place.
If I remember correctly Jack even says something like this and Will corrects him that nothing has been altered. Jack had only assumed Will had died but he never did. No paradox and everything still consistent.
Yeah, but he didn't die because his future self came back and saved him. It was Bill and Ted time travel nonsense.
Sorry, but the story makes perfect sense.
No, it's time travel period. If you interact with the past in time travel stories a paradox happens. A paradox that can't be explained with our current scientific knowledge, so there are various theories and lines of thought on if and how you could ever change anything, multiple dimensions etc. etc. It's not like there's a definite scientific answer here. So calling it nonsense just because it creates a paradox seems ignorant to me. Obviously I'm no expert on the field, however, and am open to corrections here.
Basically, I'd tell you this: Just because we experience time in a straight line doesn't mean that's how it objectively moves. Thinking about time that way means there has to be a "beginning", some timeline where the brother actually did die. But that doesn't have to be the case. Brother never died because MC always saved him because time is a loop. There is no "first" or "last" timeline, it's all one big loop. Or it's not. That's the fun thing about time travel! It's all possible! Or not. Again, I'm happy to be corrected by the resident GAF time professor ^^
Yeah, but the game goes to great lengths to say you can't make a paradox. No matter what you do, whatever has happened will still happen. So if you start mixing in paradoxes in this story, you are in conflict with the rules of the story.
But this is totally in line with that. His brother never died because MC always saved him by traveling to the past.
But he didn't always close the break in the past. By closing the break they are changing the past, which they should not be able to do. They can't stop anything from happening, be it 9/11 or their parent's deaths or whatever, but they can stop the break, even though it has already happened and caused the end of time.
Paradoxes and alternate timelines are a thing, and (even though I find them cheap and stupid) they work in other stories. But if during the whole game it is stated you can't change the past, but then the story ends by changing the past...
Why are you so sure that they did close the break? The story was clearly set up for a sequel and Martin Hatch can obviously only exist if the End of Time does indeed happen. And at the end of the game we know that Jack wants to go back to save the agent (sorry, been a while) and we can probably guess that the time-fuckery he starts by trying that isn't great for the whole time-space-continuum-business.. Obviously we won't ever see any of that but the presence of Martin Hatch clearly showed that the End of Time has not been averted but only delayed. At least that's how I remember interpreting it back then but again, it's been quite a few months for me.
The thing that killed me was stressing through the whole game that the timeline couldn't be altered, but then Jack's brother being allowed to survive because Jack didn't technically see it happen. I hate stupid time paradox stories and that was just the worst of the worst.
We know that things are different because at the end of the game everyone is fine. At the point he goes back to save his brother the earth is basically a disaster zone heading toward the end of time, and when the game ends, everything is relatively ok. It might not be completely fixed, but we are obviously in a different future. A future that supposedly has to happen because you can't change the past.
The entire time the game is going on it is made pretty clear that you can't branch off into a different future. Except until the point when the game says you can. Yes, the game definitely wants to imply that Jack will go back and somehow save Beth, but if that is possible then the game is again thoroughly breaking its own rules.
I think you missed a huge undertone at the end of the game... nothing actually changed.
Jack wasn't able to save his brother simply because he didn't see it happen. Will was always saved by future Jack. Present Jack simply didn't see him get saved because their was a giant stone in the way.
Also, Jack didn't actually prevent the ending that Serine saw. He THINKS he did.
So basically what you're saying is that everything just played out as it had already played out and time will end anyway. Serene just didn't know it because he hadn't visited that part of the timeline. Except this still doesn't explain the times that Jack visited the pool with both Beth and college girl and again with Beth and college girl and the scientist. Because at that point in time Jack had already set the countermeasure off.
I don't think that's true. I'm pretty sure the employment of the Counter-Measure and the subsequent interview with Monarch are the chronolically last parts of the game until the End of Time in 2021. This detailed timeline seems to say the same.
7:05AM
Jack and William arrive at the Bradbury Swimming Hall.
7:59AM
William sets time for October 10th, 2016, a few moments after Jack's departure. They return to the future.
Ah OK, I think I was forgetting this part
So the triggering of the countermeasure does occur after the other pool visits.
So basically time is still going to end and there's nothing anyone can do about it yay.
Some sort of fleshing out of who Martin Hatch is and what happened to him would be nice. He found a naturally occurring time machine and existed in multiple timelines at once?
Ah OK, I think I was forgetting this part
So the triggering of the countermeasure does occur after the other pool visits.
So basically time is still going to end and there's nothing anyone can do about it yay.