JigglesBunny
Banned
That is some insane next level support.
Cannot wait.
Cannot wait.
Maybe the other two maps needed some extra PolishAlso yeah no Polish map is a bummer.
I figure maps in Siege might involve a lot of backend development due to the way destruction and operators work. Basically the maps become more open and prone to undesired effects. But yes even then I don't see why reducing map count is necessary.
Infact if you think about it, shouldn't it be easier to add two operators than add a new map ? I've never quite understood how how 2 operators and 1 map takes 3-4 months to release. If it's due to the back end stuff being worked upon then that means they work on backend side by side which makes you then think why would they push back the release of operators/maps if that were the case.
Unreadable on mobile, here and on the website bothLook at the roadmap
That is some insane next level support.
Cannot wait.
I'm on mobile and can see it fine.Unreasonable on mobile, here and on the website both.
Yes but that's going to happen regardless of how long you take to release the operators because they won't know what's broken or underpowered until they really test it out for real with their playerbase. If they could do otherwise by simply doing internal testing then Blackbeard with his 700-800hp shield would never have made it to launch.Balancing and integration into the roster in the case of operators. Gadgets tend to have a pretty notable effect on the game, and vary pretty significantly in how they effect the gameplay and world itself, so making sure that's tight and works properly would take a few months at least.
Also, the new ops tend to have some balance needs when released. For example, Blackbeard was previously nigh-invulnerable, and Jackal's primary assault rifle was a pinpoint accurate death machine at any range for a little while.
I mean to be faiiiir if the game had acceptable netcode this "insane next level support" wouldn't be needed in the first place. But I do agree in a way, a lot of devs would have just moved on to Siege 2 at this point.
Yes but that's going to happen regardless of how long you take to release the operators because they won't know what's broken or underpowered until they really test it out for real with their playerbase. If they could do otherwise by simply doing internal testing then Blackbeard with his 700-800hp shield would never have made it to launch.
Okay,what about the map? That's not a part of the season pass.
Weird. I cant see it. It's extremely blurry.I'm on mobile and can see it fine.
That is some insane next level support.
Cannot wait.
What's with this attitude ?I'm on mobile and can see it fine. Don't need it in HD to see GROM listed under November.
How about showing terrorist hunt some love? First off dedicated servers like competitive.
Find it very backwards that the games getting repaired a year and a half after release. What is this, early access? Funds from sales go towards fixing it!
Find it very backwards that the games getting repaired a year and a half after release. What is this, early access? Funds from sales go towards fixing it!
The comments about "Great Support" and "this is great to hear from a developer" need to stop.
This game has been out since December 2015 and many of the issues they are addressing have been there since the start.
Also, every single damn update breaks something else in the game. You could write a book on the number bugs this game has seen.
/paging Alpine for more...
I love the hell out of this game and play it constantly but Ubisoft is done a poor job in giving resources to this team to do what needs to be done.
So you would rather sit around playing a broken game with new operators on a new map... than have a better functioning game?
I love the hell out of this game and play it constantly but Ubisoft is done a poor job in giving resources to this team to do what needs to be done.
Would be nice to have both T_T
The game should have launched in a way better state to be fair, this is the players getting screwed out of content because of something out of our control.
For example I come back to play this game for a few weeks mostly because of the new maps, which are my greatest interest in the game since it is the only thing that I haven't played a million times over.
Why should I have to choose, frankly? I bought this game, and I bought its Year Two Season Pass. I have now been told, in May, when they should have been dropping extra content as part of that Season Pass, that some of the content has been delayed and other parts have been cancelled.
To be fair , the game existence is kinda of a miracle, is not like anything in the market thus it doesn't had a proved target audience nor a blueprint on how to solve problems.
I can't imagine how much work went just into making destruction work online.
What's with this attitude ?
I said I can't read it on mine here or on the website, I don't care if you can.
The season pass does not include new Operators and Maps. Those are free for everyone. It includes one week early access to the new ops and not having to unlock them with in-game XP.
You aren't getting anything less than what was advertised in the Season pass you bought, only a delay on the operators that again are for every player not just season pass owners.
why are you responding to the topic if you obviously don't have all the information?
I'm on mobile and can see it fine.
why are you responding to the topic if you obviously don't have all the information?
Is the game state that bad? Everytime theres a thread criticizing ubisoft this game is always listed as such an amazing game
Are they presenting bug-fixing as free DLC?
No it's not. Matchmaking is great in casual, ranked is a bit of a problem. The game is amazing, no question about that.Is the game state that bad? Everytime theres a thread criticizing ubisoft this game is always listed as such an amazing game
Is the game state that bad? Everytime theres a thread criticizing ubisoft this game is always listed as such an amazing game
I absolutely love the sect of NeoGAF that seems to feel its their place to advocate for massive games companies. No, they are not failing to provide what they have sold, and yet it would require someone particularly obtuse to not see why this is shitty behaviour from Ubisoft to their customers.
Any spectulation on how high tick + better hit reg will help low ping users like me vs med/high ping users?
You being wrong has nothing to do with advocating for game companies. Maybe you shouldn't get indignant about them screwing you over something that was never promised to you?
This is the roadmap they sold season passes on.
Doesn't matter if the season pass is only for early access to operators, it was based on this roadmap, and now they haven't just delayed it, they've actually canned content that was part of it.
People have a legitimate right to complain or even ask for their money back imo.
They may as well ditch Siege and move on. They're never going to be at the stage where they can achieve this game's potential. They're clearly a small team struggling to fix this thing and they can't even deliver the DLC they promise let alone expand or build the game into the COD and Battlefield level behemoth it could be.
I this game on dedicated servers? Seeing as its ubi, I doubt it.
This is the roadmap they sold season passes on.
Doesn't matter if the season pass is only for early access to operators, it was based on this roadmap, and now they haven't just delayed it, they've actually canned content that was part of it.
People have a legitimate right to complain or even ask for their money back imo.
They may as well ditch Siege and move on. They're never going to be at the stage where they can achieve this game's potential. They're clearly a small team struggling to fix this thing and they can't even deliver the DLC they promise let alone expand or build the game into the COD and Battlefield level behemoth it deserves to be.