I wasn't implying InFamous doesn't count. It's published by Sony. I was saying if Gears doesn't, I don't believe InFamous should, but I do count Gears.But seeing now bought Sucker Punch, and so far all their games were made by contract through Sony exclusively, why exclude it when none of their games will ever appear on any other platforms? We're talking semantics here, especially when you're playing double standards here by saying there are only first part and third party games and technically inFamous was first party.
I don't see what's semantic about it really. If it's published by MS, it counts, if it's not, it doesn't. That's what I believe should be counted.
The only arguable stuff to me are things like Ninja Gaiden 2, where they were published by Microsoft for a limited period, then published by a third party. But personally, I don't think it's a good game, so I didn't really consider it regardless of it's status as first party.