• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Resident Evil Stunt Performer Wins Latest Legal Case Following Career-Ending Accident

A billion dollars franchise paying 33k for a career ending injury





Article
U.K.-based stunt performer Olivia Jackson — who suffered life-changing injuries following an accident while shooting 2016's Resident Evil: The Final Chapter — has won a legal case in South Africa against a company involved in the film.

While standing in for Milla Jovovich during the 2015 shoot in Cape Town and riding a motorcycle at high speed, Jackson collided with a crane-mounted camera vehicle traveling in the opposite direction. She would spend 17 days in a coma, with her left arm having to be amputated above the elbow. She was also left with a twisted spine, paralysis of the top left quarter of her body including her neck, a dislocated shoulder, a severed thumb, punctured lungs and broken ribs, and still suffers lasting nerve damage and facial scarring.

A court in South Africa has now found in favor of Jackson, ruling that the stunt was negligently planned and executed by the local company, Bickers Actions SA, that had been operating the camera and filming vehicle. The judge also dismissed the allegation by the defendants — Gustav Marais and Roland Melville — that Jackson’s motorbike riding was at fault. Alongside Bickers Action SA, the stunt coordinator was Grant Hulley of Pyranha Stunts. Both companies had been engaged on the film by Davis Films/Impact Pictures.

According to the judge, Jackson, as a stunt performer, had not voluntarily assumed the risk of the accident, and she was unaware that director Paul W.S. Anderson had given the uninsured driver, Melville, instructions to decrease the safety margin from the rehearsal run to the incident run in order to get a more exciting shot.

"I miss my old face. I miss my old body. I miss my old life. At least I now finally have a court judgment that proves this stunt was badly planned and that it was not my fault,” said Jackson of the ruling.

"Action movies that require people to carry out dangerous stunts should always be very carefully planned and performed. They should also be backed by insurance that can meet the very significant life-long losses that could be incurred by any member of the cast and crew who is seriously injured," said Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts and global counsel for Jackson. "This judgment is an important recognition that stunt performers are not themselves inherently responsible, nor willing but disposable volunteers when something goes wrong. Like all workers they are owed a duty of care by those responsible for the safest possible performance of the stunt."

Jackson initially filed a lawsuit in the U.S. last September in Los Angeles, alleging that Resident Evil director Anderson and his longtime producing partner, Jeremy Bolt, were responsible, and requested unspecified damages. The defendants then filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming that Jackson’s "American lawyers are suing the wrong people in the wrong place." The suit was dismissed in November.

 

Stitch

Gold Member
And all this for a movie with terrible editing where you can't see what the fuck is happening most of the times.
Also fuck them for ignoring the cliffhanger from Part 5.
 

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
While they are shitty for only covering up to 33.000 dollars, whose fault is it that she didn't notice it before it was too late?

I know she said they said they would cover any damages, but that's her words against theirs.

If I had such a dangerous job I would have 2 lawyers reading those snakey contracts before accepting anything.
 
Last edited:

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Well this is not really game news, I don't want to be ass, but it should probably be in off-topic : )
 

Aion002

Member
A second accident occurred during filming on December 3 when crew member Ricardo Cornelius was crushed to death by one of the film's props, a US Army-issue Hummer, while on set.



Damn! I didn't know about that too.

Whoever are the responsibles, they should make amends... 33k is ridiculous.
 
While they are shitty for only covering up to 33.000 dollars, whose fault is it that she didn't notice it before it was too late?

I know she said they said they would cover any damages, but that's her words against theirs.

If I had such a dangerous job I would have 2 lawyers reading those snakey contracts before accepting anything.

Victim blaming and siding with a multi-billion dollar company all in one post.

I thought I was on Neogaf, not REE?
 

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
Victim blaming and siding with a multi-billion dollar company all in one post.

I thought I was on Neogaf, not REE?

So it can never be her fault of not reading the contract carefully?

And you're right. You're on Gaf, not a leftist sjw forum. Ree would have the exactly same opinion as you. It can never be the womans fault no matter what.

She signed the contract. A contract thats very bad. Do we no longer blame people for making mistakes, but blames everyone else? When did we turn into socialists?
 
Last edited:
So it can never be her fault of not using her brain cus it's a billion dollar company?

And you're right. You're on Gaf, not a leftist sjw forum.

It can be her fault, sure. But show me a healthy person who rides in to cameras at full speed just to get the massive pay-out of fuck all
 

The_Mike

I cry about SonyGaf from my chair in Redmond, WA
It can be her fault, sure. But show me a healthy person who rides in to cameras at full speed just to get the massive pay-out of fuck all

From what I read, it was a mistake. A very serious miscalculated mistake. English is not my native language, but from what I remember from the YouTube clip she said the scene wasn't thought of good enough or something. Didn't she really know that before the shooting?
 
From what I read, it was a mistake. A very serious miscalculated mistake. English is not my native language, but from what I remember from the YouTube clip she said the scene wasn't thought of good enough or something. Didn't she really know that before the shooting?
If she knew it wasn't safe and carried it then part of the fault lies with her

If she knew it wasn't safe and was told to carry on by the bosses, then their arse should be in jail
 

iconmaster

Banned
One crew member killed, another left a once-comatose amputee. Must have been a trainwreck of a film production.


QeFEaFK.png


😬

cFcuNuo.png


😬 😬 😬
 
Last edited:

MiguelItUp

Member
Glad it wasn't worse, and glad she won. It should've been more than that, her life is changed forever.

We're humans, not machines. Even if it was a miscaluation on her part, the shift by the production wasn't really professional, especially when it went from one basic sounding scene to a suddenly very complex one.
 
Top Bottom