From his bizarre comment about 4K TVs it's clear that he has no understanding of what resolution actually is, so his opinion on the matter is pretty irrelevant.
Nothing he said was bad in any shape or form, i actually agree with most of the stuff he said, even though his comment about 4k was much accurate [point was though] and Crytek vs COD analogy was not really well thought, still the point was accurate.
What about 1080p with very blurry AA?
The COD to crytek comparison is disingenuous. Resolution only makes things better, not worse, but in and of itself it won't increase sales. The game still needs to be one a lot of people like.
Don't know what games you're playing, but 1080p does not mean the same as last gen. Future exclusives and games not held back by cross-gen will continue to prove that.Thats the thing though, if some game was so ridiculously ambitious that it could only run at a decent framerate at 480p I rather see that game rather then the same thing we had previously at a higher res. I prefer seeing more power used for new gameplay possibilities not just to adhere to an arbitrary standard. I know I'm not the majority on that opinion though.
Not that a Ubisoft game is ever going to push the envelope in the way I describe though.
HUD is rendered in second pass in native resolution in almost every game game made for consoles.Due to scaling, the best 720p/900p IQ isn't going to look great, especially text. Text is still screwed pretty bad by 1080p
and stuff
Let's go back to 480p then. You can have resolution and fun. Imagine that!
"With the 4K TVs and things - somebody was telling me that with a 4K TV, to even see it, your living room has to be big enough to sit like 12 feet from the screen. I don't know the exact numbers, but it starts to get a little crazy.
My tv is 1080P. Games should always match the resolution of the native display. That's it. It's as simple as that.
If my TV was 900P, I'd be fine with it. It's not.
Let's go back to 480p then. You can have resolution and fun. Imagine that!
Let's go back to 480p then. You can have resolution and fun. Imagine that!
He is right to a point. I mean you can't go back to 480. But some 720 games like killer in stint has better image quality than some 900p games.
I see that a lot but does anyone have a link to that video? I want to actually hear the stupidity spew out of their mouths.
It sure isn't a selling point for me...even as a person with both consoles.
this happened? what year was this? was it recent?
It was around a year ago when the disparity in console power was becoming apparent. Don't worry though, IGN has been very "honest" in letting us know their "journalists" are simply stupid and not trying to make friends with the company that benefits the most from such nonsense.
I think that may be exactly the point - what if a game came out, a multiplat, and it was 1080p on one system and 900p on another? Which would you get it for?
I'm not convinced they are displaying MS bias. I think they're just completely ill equipped to speak on these topics. I said "dummies" before, I probably shouldn't have been so mean, but they definitely said dumb things.
Simple, PC version
Let's go back to 480p then. You can have resolution and fun. Imagine that!
I'm not convinced they are displaying MS bias. I think they're just completely ill equipped to speak on these topics. I said "dummies" before, I probably shouldn't have been so mean, but they definitely said dumb things.
Is it Monday? It feels like a Monday, for some reason.
Let's go back to 480p then. You can have resolution and fun. Imagine that!
Is it Monday? It feels like a Monday, for some reason.
"It feels weird to me that people are cool about playing a sort of retro pixel game, and yet the resolution somehow matters."