Drkirby said:There already is a one:
Hope its sprites look as nice as the PC Engine version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhUENyQhsKQ
Drkirby said:Hope its sprites look as nice as the PC Engine version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhUENyQhsKQ
That is due to Youtube (Or maybe Emulator Filters), the game looks like thisn0b said:Best coop game ever. I am curious as to what "online version for PCs" implies.
Those are horrible and if the game looked as ugly and blurred as that I would cry.
Drkirby said:That is due to Youtube (Or maybe Emulator Filters), the game looks like this
Yes! Best soccer game ever.Beardz said:Can we have this baby too?
Zee-Row said:Who owns the rights to all of Techno's old IPs? I thought it was Atlus.
Could've been ace, but it was terribly broken.cj_iwakura said:The GBA remake was ace.
LQX said:Man I wish the team behind Scott Pilgrim the game were the ones making this. It would probably be too perfect.
BobTheFork said:Wasn't there already a 'sequel'? I don't mean dodgeball or the crash games, I just remember a sequel of some kind that didn't look anything like the first one...on S.N.E.S I think
Lunchbox said:these types of games dont hold up anymore
if they dont modernize it somehow, it'll be disappointing after the nostalgia runs out. 2d beatemups had their day
I half agree it might not hold up, but not for the reason you give. Not due to the 2D beat'em up thing, because River City Ransom was never popular for being just another well done beat'em up. However, the things that set it apart in 1989 are no longer nearly as rare in 2011; like having one interconnected world rather than levels, and being an action game that lets you upgrade your character. I used to describe parts of games as reminding me of River City Ransom due to things like that, but I started doing it with so many games it became a useless descriptor.Lunchbox said:these types of games dont hold up anymore
if they dont modernize it somehow, it'll be disappointing after the nostalgia runs out. 2d beatemups had their day
Nah, especially not on the lower difficulty. I suppose it would be harder if you purposefully went through without buying any stat upgrades or new moves.Iron_Scimitar said:Never played this. Wasnt this game stupid hard on Nintendo?
They (Million) made the GBA EX version of Double Dragon as well. So either Million or Atlus have the rights to DD, seems so.TreIII said:As for the rest? Well, Double Dragon seems to be a thing that Million doesn't have access to, at the moment.
Zee-Row said:Who owns the rights to all of Techno's old IPs? I thought it was Atlus.
ArjanN said:
Pretty much. Just look at the Scott Pilgrim game. I was barely about to finish the game once.Lunchbox said:these types of games dont hold up anymore
if they dont modernize it somehow, it'll be disappointing after the nostalgia runs out. 2d beatemups had their day