DiamondDog74
Banned
If I were to surmise the argument here, it must be folks saying TFA is bad because of the story being similar to ANH. Honestly that's fine by me. I don't want anything resembling 1-3.
If I were to surmise the argument here, it must be folks saying TFA is bad because of the story being similar to ANH. Honestly that's fine by me. I don't want anything resembling 1-3.
And since you're done reading my posts I'm done wasting my time commenting on this kind of stuff. I literally just explained to you how completely different the Han death scene was from Obi-Wan's (how it's a DIRECT CONTRAST with Vader's decision to save Luke and not a mirror of the confrontation in ANH). It's like I'm talking to a brick wall..
How is it a moot point? Are you suggesting that the opening crawl (which outlines the film and where it's going) is irrelevant as long as the action is good? What? If you're relying on action scenes to cover for a contrived opening crawl you know something has gone terribly wrong. That's what the crawl is for.. this is like super basic stuff and it seems like you're just arguing for the sake of argument at this point.
Google is your friend.. I just did a search for The Phantom Menace initial reviews and there is a lot of stuff there including critic and fan reactions. Lots are good, yes, but lots are very bad. It got way worse after the film sat in theaters for a few weeks though (after the visual effects splendor washed away).
George Lucas at one point said he is "the key to all this", in regard to the story. You're acting as though he's some background character that appears in a couple scenes for kids. Everyone makes a big deal about him because he's terrible and ruined a huge part of TPM by being a main character.
I have no idea why you seem to think my opinion is in the minority.
The point I was trying to make is that the vast majority of the differences in the story have to do with deeper and more meaningful components (ie CHARACTERS and where they're going/who they might be in the coming films), which is a hell of a lot more interesting than the way the film looks or the surface similarities between basic plot points (not to say they shouldn't have been more creative visually, which I hope will be rectified in EP8/9).
I'm not 'done reading your posts', I rarely ever have these kinds of long-stretched forum discussions and sometimes I accidentally skim over important parts or flat-out read them wrong. Sorry..
Anyway..
I'm not sure why this particular part was so important to you though, since it was a simple statement of yours (where was the explanation you claim to have given?), so it's not like I brushed over your arguments here. If you had given that explanation, I would have been way more likely to not confuse it.
You somehow refuse to see the similiarities to the duel between Obi Wan and Vader here, when it clearly takes its cues from both scenes. I agree it's also comparable to the situation Vader/Luke was in in RoTJ, but that's not the only way to look at it. Aside from the obvious similiarities in setup, Obi Wan gained power by losing to his former apprentice, while in TFA this is reversed so that Kylo gains resolve by killing his father.
It doesn't matter whether its a duel or just murder, because it was a duel in both other scenes.
Again, I could throw this right back. I wasn't talking simply about the action scenes, but that the story itself takes a different turn here than how you would have thought just by reading the opening crawl.
The Trade Federation is talking to a Sith, so you learn there is a greater evil working in the background here. This is plain story. After that - and that was simply to counter your 'boredom' argument - action takes place instead of simply a 'boring' meeting with the viceroy. So why even still talk about the opening crawl at that time, hence why I think it's moot.
But why is it contrived? It's just not that important by its own, but it becomes the pretense for much more.
You know, you could have just linked the source to that. You were the one saying the movie fell through after a short honeymoon period. I was simply questioning that. Not even talking about reviews here, simply how the audience initially perceived the movie.
Well, he leads them to his people, which was surely important enough, but aside from that he just acted goofy for the most part.
Again, I've never claimed your opinion was in the minority. Where are you getting that from? We both agree he is a terrible character and the only thing I disagree with is that even kids don't like him.
It seems to be impossible to keep Jar Jar out of a TPM discussion. He was so bad, he ruined the movie, I get it. I regret even mentioning his name.
Those 'surface familiarities' amount to essentially almost the entire storyline. Individually, most of these are superficial for sure, but when you're watching the movie and it follows this framework of story points from beginning to almost the end, it has a meaningful impact. Especially when the original story events in between make no sense or are simply badly thought out.
I couldn't look past that, even if the movie has its own set of likable characters that went through a different development.
I really wish we could get stats on how many people (who didn't know the actor is dead) recognized that Tarkin was CGI. I'm willing to be it's a LOT lower than people think, despite being noticeable upon inspection.
The facial animations took me out of it. It was too animated.I know a lot of people who didn't recognize it s GCI, but for me was noticeable: When Tarkin was side to side with real actors, he looked like somewhat cartoonish in its proportions.
It was a mix of dead eyes and "maybe we overdid it with the long face"
I know a lot of people who didn't recognize it s GCI, but for me was noticeable: When Tarkin was side to side with real actors, he looked like somewhat cartoonish in its proportions.
It was a mix of dead eyes and "maybe we overdid it with the long face"
So I finally forced myself to see and BOY AM I GLAD I DID. The best Star Wars since the 80s, absolutely positively it is. This movie is almost flawless. GREAT movie, one for the ages. Jyn Erso is the best female character in Star Wars, the actress totally blew all of the other ones away. This movie just shows that you CAN make a good Star Wars movie, J.J.Abrams should feel ashamed.
I know a lot of people who didn't recognize it s GCI, but for me was noticeable: When Tarkin was side to side with real actors, he looked like somewhat cartoonish in its proportions.
It was a mix of dead eyes and "maybe we overdid it with the long face"
So I finally forced myself to see and BOY AM I GLAD I DID. The best Star Wars since the 80s, absolutely positively it is. This movie is almost flawless. GREAT movie, one for the ages. Jyn Erso is the best female character in Star Wars, the actress totally blew all of the other ones away. This movie just shows that you CAN make a good Star Wars movie, J.J.Abrams should feel ashamed.
So I finally forced myself to see and BOY AM I GLAD I DID. The best Star Wars since the 80s, absolutely positively it is. This movie is almost flawless. GREAT movie, one for the ages. Jyn Erso is the best female character in Star Wars, the actress totally blew all of the other ones away. This movie just shows that you CAN make a good Star Wars movie, J.J.Abrams should feel ashamed.
Jyn is better than.. Rey.. AND Leia?
Considering his film is the best reviewed Star Wars movie since ESB, made almost a billion dollars in the US alone and more than two billion worldwide, and basically saved Star Wars after the prequel trilogy shitfest, I'm sure J.J. feels just fine.
Vastly better than Rey (Rey is pretty much the worst protagonist in Star Wars by a huge margin) and better than Leia. Jyn feels incredible, fresh, believable and is a fantastic anchor for the whole movie.
It was still an utter tripe. Just because it sold well doesn't make it a good movie. People went in just because it's Star Wars and it wasn't an absolute catastrophe like the prequels. The Force Awakens is not a good movie.
I'm going to go see the movie again, I haven't done that ever in my life.
Of course now that I've seen your opinion on Jyn as "fresh" and "believable," I think I can safely disregard any of your opinions.
Vastly better than Rey (Rey is pretty much the worst protagonist in Star Wars by a huge margin)
Wow someone just called Jyn "incredible".
Just saw this. MUCH better than TFA.
So I finally forced myself to see and BOY AM I GLAD I DID. The best Star Wars since the 80s, absolutely positively it is. This movie is almost flawless. GREAT movie, one for the ages. Jyn Erso is the best female character in Star Wars, the actress totally blew all of the other ones away.
I liked the movie too, but that's not how you spell Ahsoka Tano.
She good climber andWow someone just called Jyn "incredible".
Vastly better than Rey (Rey is pretty much the worst protagonist in Star Wars by a huge margin) and better than Leia. Jyn feels incredible, fresh, believable and is a fantastic anchor for the whole movie.
It was still an utter tripe. Just because it sold well doesn't make it a good movie. People went in just because it's Star Wars and it wasn't an absolute catastrophe like the prequels. The Force Awakens is not a good movie.
I'm going to go see the movie again, I haven't done that ever in my life.
It was still an utter tripe. Just because it sold well doesn't make it a good movie. People went in just because it's Star Wars and it wasn't an absolute catastrophe like the prequels. The Force Awakens is not a good movie.
I'm going to go see the movie again, I haven't done that ever in my life.
It was still an utter tripe. Just because it sold well doesn't make it a good movie. People went in just because it's Star Wars and it wasn't an absolute catastrophe like the prequels. The Force Awakens is not a good movie.
In fairness, box office takings are a fairly unreliable measure of a movie's quality and you can't infer too much about whether TFA is better than RO (or vice-versa) based on each movie's takings. There are a range of factors which can plausibly explain why TFA outperformed RO in revenue terms, independent of the quality of each movie.If it was just a case of people wanting to see a non-shit Star Wars movie, why is Rogue One tracking so far below TFA, despite playing in more theaters? Obviously it's still doing well, but nowhere near TFA numbers. And if you say it's just because there was so much pent up demand, I can only say let's wait and see what happens with Episode VIII. If it's as good a movie as TFA, don't be surprised if it sees similar numbers and also eclipses RO.
Don't act like you are the enlightened one who saw through the bullshit where others couldn't. It's not a good look. You didn't like the movie, that's it. That doesn't negate the opinion of others.
Well, I have yet to meet someone who would say the movie is not bad, I know a lot of people who saw it and none were impressed with VII, on the other hand my super critical brother and his girlfriend absolutely loved Rogue One.
Well, I have yet to meet someone who would say the movie is not bad, I know a lot of people who saw it and none were impressed with VII, on the other hand my super critical brother and his girlfriend absolutely loved Rogue One.
Oh shit well that anecdotal evidence delivered on a video game message board completely changes everything.
Somehow I seriously doubt that.
I will also add that I find it very odd that you hold R1 in such high regard when it suffered from a lot of the same issues TFA did (alongside very similar criticisms).
Movie gets 92% on RT, makes 2 billion dollars, and the next movie in the franchise will go on to make one billion based on the success of the first movie, but no one liked it.
[edit]
Just to compare, a movie with Batman and Superman that was panned when it came out has already made less than Rogue One, I think that should tell you how much good will TFA garnered among viewers.
I think it has something to do with national mentality. Some movies generally resonate better with different audiences. A movie can be loved in one country and disliked in the other, people aren't as homogeneous as they might seem.
Out of all the people I know who have seen the movie my dad gave it the best review saying it was "ok, forgettable but ok overall" with everyone else disliking it. I also thought it wasn't terrible, but I was very disappointed in general.
I suppose I should have been more specific and say that I didn't like the movie and my circle of friends and acquaintances didn't also. There are obviously people who liked the movie out there like with any kind of product but I still stand by my opinion that Rogue One is my favourite Star Wars movie along with A New Hope.
So I finally forced myself to see and BOY AM I GLAD I DID. The best Star Wars since the 80s, absolutely positively it is. This movie is almost flawless. GREAT movie, one for the ages. Jyn Erso is the best female character in Star Wars, the actress totally blew all of the other ones away. This movie just shows that you CAN make a good Star Wars movie, J.J.Abrams should feel ashamed.
But do you see how the few people around you are in a pretty extreme minority in regard to critic/fan reception? Bad movies don't hit 2B, it's pretty much as simple as that. At least not yet.
One of the most famous and well loved female characters of all time gets completely blown away by someone in a movie you've seen once, a few hours ago. Fuck me.
No offense taken at all. Just conversing.Arrright, I guess I was wrong, can you forgive me, please? I was just saying how I felt about the whole thing. And I don't mean it in a sarcastic way, I just want to apologise if I offended you.
I don't know which one you are referring to (some say Rey, some say Ashoka or Leia) but none of these characters really felt good to me. Leia is obviously the best of the 3 but I still like Jyn more.
No offense taken at all. Just conversing.
Nope none at all. Sorry if I gave that impression.arrright, no hard feelings, I hope
To continue though, I don't really "shit on TFA" even thought it might have seem like it. It just wasn't my cup of tea at all. The plot was moving too fast, the characters were developing too fast and there were no properly defined villains. I just found Rogue One vastly more enjoyable.
You didn't think Kylo Ren was properly defined?
You didn't think Kylo Ren was properly defined?
Saw it last night with my other half who knows absolutely nothing about Star Wars. Was pretty disappointed myself but she seemed to love it and now wants to watch the the rest of the films so I guess it worked?