DeepEnigma
Gold Member
You are not special for rating their security so low
He did it for the clicks.
You are not special for rating their security so low
The timing is too coincidental and this almost has to be because of the Fallout 4 Fiasco.I did have an account there but I haven't log in for 7 years on an old E-mail account so I almost don't care that it's out there now.
I give Rooster Teeth's security a 3/5
You are not special for rating their security so low
He did it for the clicks.
It's a shitty thing to happen regardless, but was it really an overzealous fan? That'd be a pretty bad look.
What? I wasn't implying that GB fans did this. Just that the gifs were silly.Well your opinion was shitty in this case, supported with zero facts, and I am not even a GB fan.
Pay monthly fee for xlusive videos on their site.
Very popular company that make gaming related videos that mostly end up on YouTube but joining their site gets you content earlier or things that don't make it to YouTube.
What? I wasn't implying that GB fans did this. Just that the gifs were silly.
The fact that you lump everyone with access to the internet and gifs into one group (in this case GB fans), makes me laugh and your digging social stance in the other thread.
You have an angle. Your transparency is showing.
Well done Internet and gaming community. Add this to the list of why gaming culture is sad
Well done Internet and gaming community. Add this to the list of why gaming culture is sad
It's funny (sad) how some people are more willing to believe that this was the work of some disgruntled GB fans than to admit that Rooster Teeth was shilling for Bethesda.
Case in point. Do you have any proof that this was done by "the gaming community"? Websites are breached every single day. Yet you choose to assume that, again, this is the work of some angry fans... Not to mention that RT did virtually nothing to protect their users from this sort of stuff.
Very true. Lizard or Anon have been known to attack shilling sites, etc.
*puts on tin foil hat*
What if this was some elaborate ruse by RT. To divert the nasty attention they were receiving, hoping to gain sympathy for some of the gamers that down voted them the past two days, for their stupid, almost slanderous comments?
*takes hat off*
Whoa!
I blame Fallout 4.
(And quit bitching about the reasons - or not - for the hack. They stored user details in plaintext. It's 2015.)
The exact same thing happened to RT in 2013, and back then their "Director of Technology" said "It's actually encrypted passwords -- Please retire that password. They are heavily salted."
Couldn't think of a more witty retort then, Oh My!The fact that you lump everyone with access to the internet and gifs into one group (in this case GB fans), makes me laugh at your digging social stance in the other thread.
You have an angle. Your transparency is showing.
Then I retract my comment.
So they've been successfully hacked twice in 2 years? Fine work.
The exact same thing happened to RT in 2013, and back then their "Director of Technology" said "It's actually encrypted passwords -- Please retire that password. They are heavily salted."
This really does suck. Saw the news on reddit and moved to reset my password on their site.
That said, I don't think that the passwords were in plaintext guys. This is what Adam Baird (Rooster Teeth's Director of Technology) said when they were hit back in 2013 "It's actually encrypted passwords -- Please retire that password. They are heavily salted.". He then goes on to elaborate down the thread that ever since they moved to their new site passwords have been hashed.
Great example of GB fans.
Oh, so maybe they don't suck quite so much at security and instead just have incredibly shitty PR?
That's not so bad, though with things like these you need to present all of the information available as plainly as possible so your users know what actions to take (and so you don't look like morons).
I mean "Based on what we know, your username, password and email address may have been viewed" is ambiguous for sure, but it's ambiguous on the side of plaintext, which would be a horrific admission.
Pretty much. It really is weird, Rooster Teeth is usually great when it comes to PR and at being opened to their community in general, but for some reason they completely shit the bed with the messaging for this.Oh, so maybe they don't suck quite so much at security and instead just have incredibly shitty PR?
That's not so bad, though with things like these you need to present all of the information available as plainly as possible so your users know what actions to take (and so you don't look like morons).
I mean "Based on what we know, your username, password and email address may have been viewed" is ambiguous for sure, but it's ambiguous on the side of plaintext, which would be a horrific admission.
I feel bad for the users, but I think it is kinda some karmic backlash
In a perfect world, only the podcast crew would have been affected
I have reason to doubt your scientific credentials.
I guess I should clarify that comment. I was saying people would a negative idea of GB fans with this thread.I have reason to doubt your scientific credentials.
Every post I ever see of yours is salt filled angst or personal attacks. Maybe take a break from the internet for awhile.
The idea that Jeff even needs someone to defend him against the ramblings of an underwear model is just silly to me.
If there were "proper hashes" in place like that guy said, is there any way that a hacker can be able to view those passwords? I thought that was the whole point.
password1
password2
password3
salt123password1
sapassltword2123
password3salt123
rtwetrwyuhrtwyrtyrtyrtwy
rey45yertsye4563uy45y4
5ty45564y56yu56y4576
If there were "proper hashes" in place like that guy said, is there any way that a hacker can be able to view those passwords? I thought that was the whole point.
Not exactly, its just a text file or a database entry. Its all down to the implementation. As a basic example, this is the differences between the ways to store a password.
If its plaintext, that file will be formatted like this
If its salted, it would look something like this
and if its hashed, it would look like this
Here is a source if you want to know more https://crackstation.net/hashing-security.htm
Great example of GB fans.