Blizzard is going to do the same thing with battle.net for sc2 and diablo 3. They've had a taste, they arent going back.CounterSeal said:I'm still a bit confused.. isn't Activision called Activision Blizzard now? Because they so don't deserve to have the word "Blizzard" in their corporate identity, like at all.
1cesc said:http://forums.infinityward.com/viewtopic.php?p=720244#p720244
So it won't be for MW2, but maybe next year's CoD?
snap0212 said:Won't buy if true... easy as that.
.TheCardPlayer said:Fuck that shit.
Vormund said:I hope there was a comments box so you can tell them to FOAD.
The Faceless Master said:this gen is the beginning of the end.
pay dlc is the harbinger of death to videogames.
it opened the doors to ridiculous shit like this.
pay more for team matchmaking? really?
:lol :lol :lol
Slayer-33 said:Guys
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol @ the poll/percentage options
RandomVince said:Indeed.
And guarantee that the service will be dropped after 2 years max. I would say 1 year, but we know that Cod 7: World at War 2 will be out next year, and the subscription will last until CoD8: Modern Warfare 3 hits. By which time, with all the map packs, subscriptions, and premium premium (yes, two premium tiers) content has been flogged, the most passionate (read: exploited) CoD fans will have paid for the game three times over.
I think Ill buy an extra EA game to spite Activision in light of this.
RandomVince said:Indeed.
And guarantee that the service will be dropped after 2 years max. I would say 1 year, but we know that Cod 7: World at War 2 will be out next year, and the subscription will last until CoD8: Modern Warfare 3 hits. By which time, with all the map packs, subscriptions, and premium premium (yes, two premium tiers) content has been flogged, the most passionate (read: exploited) CoD fans will have paid for the game three times over.
I think Ill buy an extra EA game to spite Activision in light of this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MfEU74mxFwVormund said:hehe haven't see it sorry.
But you got the gist of it.
Ballistictiger said:If this was true we'll having people defending this monthly pay subscription in the future.
I doubt it's true.
Jackl said:And people will defend every ounce of it for years still. Because they love handing their paychecks to megacorps.
When basic features become subscription services.
Psychotext said:If this and the UK RRP are to be believed; I think Activision are going for full on shooter fan wallet raping on this one.
F#A#Oo said:This isn't for Modern Warfare you numpty but CoD franchise...
Deacan said:Holy crap I just noticed the Modern Warfare 2 price in the UK, RRP: £54.99
My lord Activision are truly wallet rapists. Feck the recession lets just scalp people even more.
The Faceless Master said:this gen is the beginning of the end.
pay dlc is the harbinger of death to videogames.
it opened the doors to ridiculous shit like this.
pay more for team matchmaking? really?
:lol :lol :lol
Petrae said:Downloadable content is the epic failure of this console generation. Not the Red Rings of Death. Not the exorbitant price point of the PS3. Not forced Wii waggle. It's DLC.
It doesn't matter. People have already shown much more willingness to suck up in this generation. It's not like companies will decide if this should be implemented or not based on this survey. I would say Activision has already decided to go ahead with this plan and it is trying to determine price point which it hopes should be acceptable.Marty Chinn said:Screw all of you who say they hope they do it for the lulz. That's way too risky of a gamble because what if they do it and enough people actually jump on that shit which starts a really bad slipperly slope when publishers realize people will pay for that shit. Way too much downside to risk for a good laugh. I hope the reaction just makes it so it never sees the light of day.
D4Danger said:Publisher holding back features to sell as DLC is the worst thing.
There are plenty of good examples of DLC (GTA4, Team Fortress 2 etc).
D4Danger said:Publisher holding back features to sell as DLC is the worst thing.
There are plenty of good examples of DLC (GTA4, Team Fortress 2 etc).
F#A#Oo said:TF2? No.
D4Danger said:Are you saying TF2's DLC isn't good?
There will be unless two DLCs (map packs), 360 timed exclusive.F#A#Oo said:As long as Infinity Ward supports MW:2...that is all I care about tbh...
With CoD4 the support was almost non-existent after the initial 6 months...btw I'm not asking for Valve type service but CoD 4 is and was one of the most games on PSN/XBL and I felt that Infinity Ward just sat around idle not really supporting it as much as they could have.
BlinkGT said:There will be unless two DLCs (map packs), 360 timed exclusive.
unomas said:Oh for fucks sake! This game doesn't make them enough money already?
They didn't want gamers to stay on CoD4 when CoD:WaW released. They focused on CoD:WaW, CoD4 was already a success. It's Activision, the most important thing is money, money, money...Kiriku said:That's the weird thing with Call of Duty 4, they barely released any DLC for it. Missed opportunity.