Yep.
Still hurts.
It would probably have been terrible.
If you buy the theory that ORC is what became of the PSP game, then "terrible" doesn't quite begin to describe it.
Yep.
Still hurts.
It would probably have been terrible.
Is this a game that people will want to replay like Tetris?
That's ten times as long as it takes to review the game.
Can't forget this either.
It takes 14 days to review?
Can't forget this either.
Clue some of us in
Ten dollars per month....‏@supererogatory
If my math is correct, CoD Vita had like a four-five month development cycle.
superannuation ‏@supererogatory
They didn't really start development until around when Resistance shipped and wrapped up early last month. So May to October.
https://twitter.com/supererogatory
Bonus:
Must have been cheap to make then.
50$
It's no surprise Nihilistic left traditional development, re-branded themselves, and went to iOS. Being forced to make a Call of Duty game in 5 months... the pressure was probably insane
Can we have more time?
No, sorry.
Hi, I'm doing well!
I'm saying making some weird semantic distinction between "Single Player" and "Offline" is a totally awkward and disingenuous way to make that argument
It's a shame this is such a throwaway effort, the Vita is capable of so much more.
At least they spend a bit of their development budget on the Metacritic user review positive feedback campaign.
46 of the 85 written user reviews are reviews done by accounts that were specifically created for COD Blops Declassified.
Earlier I compiled a few of those. (There are more now. The positive one-review accounts accounted for more than 67% of all reviews at that point.)
These ONLY wrote user reviews for for Declassified on Metacritic:
Should have reskinned a gameloft game. Or just replace the title screen.
Yeah, earlier today when I compiled it was almost unanimously positivity by the new accounts. There were some additions with negativity now.Quite a few of the negative ones (zero scores etc) have only written one review as well, although I'm sure there is some fanboy-ism going on, as well as genuine reviews. Perhaps even some foul-play, yep maybe.
To be fair, the single player stuff is supposed to be an arcadey score attack game you replay. But the general consensus outside of the game's OT is "Why would you want to"
At least they spend a bit of their development budget on the Metacritic user review positive feedback campaign.
46 of the 85 written user reviews are reviews done by accounts that were specifically created for COD Blops Declassified.
how is this even possible? why not delayed the game instead?
At least they spend a bit of their development budget on the Metacritic user review positive feedback campaign.
46 of the 85 written user reviews are reviews done by accounts that were specifically created for COD Blops Declassified.
(Just for context, other games hover around 10% single-review-accounts.)
Earlier I compiled a few of those. (There are more now. The positive one-review accounts accounted for more than 67% of all reviews at that point.)
These ONLY wrote user reviews for for Declassified on Metacritic:
10 TheMightyJew
10 oMILLERoTIMEo
10 P8ntball4
10 edleao
10 dungey
10 DrDeath
10 marckivar
10 birthright
10 ephiroth
10 IBY
10 ImmortalA9
10 KonaBro
10 megazoidd
10 VR-4nic
10 d1897
10 hammy316
10 Nitendoheady
10 TheVitaMustLive
9 Vinbeansel
9 Torrella
9 wakey1210
9 billblue555
9 nm1043
9 lowlifemalakye
9 TwoLittleGamers
9 sparky7531
9 Sofamonster
9 TURBO777
9 David530
9 RasecMask
8 Deviator
8 Fruitbat1919
8 axlnizam
8 savvytonio
Yeah, earlier today when I compiled it was almost unanimously positivity by the new accounts. There were some additions with negativity now.
how is this even possible? why not delayed the game instead?
I was being facetious. I just wanted to share my stats from the other thread.Don't you think this is just a teenie weenie bit conspiracy theorist? I don't think the people at Nihilistic even believe they made a great game here.
Does it really take five months to reskin Resistance to CoD?
The problem isn't the game itself being a low quality rushjob, it's the disconnect between the game being a low quality rushjob and Sony presenting it as a major third party game and the Vita having not a whole lot this fall and people pinning a lot of their hopes and aspirations for the machine on the game.
So a game that was announced 18 months ago was only really worked on for 5 months?
Why?
Don't you think this is just a teenie weenie bit conspiracy theorist? I don't think the people at Nihilistic even believe they made a great game here.
The problem isn't the game itself being a low quality rushjob, it's the disconnect between the game being a low quality rushjob and Sony presenting it as a major third party game and the Vita having not a whole lot this fall and people pinning a lot of their hopes and aspirations for the machine on the game.
A 10/10 from a user named "TheVitaMustLive."At least they spend a bit of their development budget on the Metacritic user review positive feedback campaign.
46 of the 85 written user reviews are reviews done by accounts that were specifically created for COD Blops Declassified.
(Just for context, other games hover around 10% single-review-accounts.)
Earlier I compiled a few of those. (There are more now. The positive one-review accounts accounted for more than 67% of all reviews at that point.)
These ONLY wrote user reviews for for Declassified on Metacritic:
10 TheMightyJew
10 oMILLERoTIMEo
10 P8ntball4
10 edleao
10 dungey
10 DrDeath
10 marckivar
10 birthright
10 ephiroth
10 IBY
10 ImmortalA9
10 KonaBro
10 megazoidd
10 VR-4nic
10 d1897
10 hammy316
10 Nitendoheady
10 TheVitaMustLive
9 Vinbeansel
9 Torrella
9 wakey1210
9 billblue555
9 nm1043
9 lowlifemalakye
9 TwoLittleGamers
9 sparky7531
9 Sofamonster
9 TURBO777
9 David530
9 RasecMask
8 Deviator
8 Fruitbat1919
8 axlnizam
8 savvytonio
defenders/apologists exist here, i spoke with some
Which is longer than most Vitas have ever been on. I wish I was joking. :\
So a game that was announced 18 months ago was only really worked on for 5 months?
Why?
It was announced at this years E3.
I was always under the imrpession that Activision worked on this for a year before handing over to Nihilistic. I would love to see what was discussed behind closed doors for this game.
Why didn't they just say upfront that it's a multiplayer only game and charge less? Nobody would have given a shit.
Charging full price on the other hand, should mean you get a full game.
I was always under the imrpession that Activision worked on this for a year before handing over to Nihilistic. I would love to see what was discussed behind closed doors for this game.