Lonely1 said:Um, none? Shit would be too expensive.
But if this will not have SCE full support it could be an epic fubar for the PSP brand.K.Jack said:This is not SCE.
This is not SCE.
This is not SCE.
Huh? I was saying that this had no chance of having the full PSP board along with Snapdragon to run android.DieH@rd said:Too expencive? Iphone 4 is right now selling for $600 [thats one buck more than FIVE HUNDRED NINETY NINE], and PSP1 is how much $170?. Why should this be cheaper than iphone? Slap a ton of hardware in it, and give it to few carriers and subsidize price with 2 year contracts.
Nirolak said:They do sell grips for these things.
The Evo 4G is close to king of phones and is 449 off contract, a couple hundred on. It could be reasonably priced.DieH@rd said:Too expencive? Iphone 4 is right now selling for $600 [thats one buck more than FIVE HUNDRED NINETY NINE], and PSP1 is how much $170?. Why should this be cheaper than iphone? Slap a ton of hardware in it, and give it to few carriers and subsidize price with 2 year contracts.
Nirolak said:They do sell grips for these things.
Small fix.Lonely1 said:But if this will not have SCE full support it could be an epic fubar for the Playstation brand.
Mama Robotnik said:Oh okay, I must be getting very mixed up then. Apologies for crapping the thread up, and thanks for the clarification.
Lonely1 said:But if this will not have SCE full support it could be an epic fubar for the PSP brand.
aeolist said:Probably not Snapdragon if this is at all true and gaming-oriented, the Snapdragon has a mediocre GPU.
There are SoCs with far better GPUs out there. Like the Hummingbird.Andrex said:Well yeah, it's a SoC.
Lonely1 said:But if this will not have SCE full support it could be an epic fubar for the PSP brand.
Snapdragon is a Cortex A8, the A9 here would be a lot faster.GaussTek said:IMO, they should use this:
http://www.stericsson.com/platforms/U8500.jsp
(or perhaps that's using a Snapdragon?)
Durante said:There are SoCs with far better GPUs out there. Like the Hummingbird.
:lol :loljonnybryce said:Is Sony is finally listening to what consumers want? Wowza. This will be all I ever want and need.
DMeisterJ said:Sony has much more experience in creating a gaming platform, while, aside from Game Center, Apple has let third parties do the work re: Gaming on the iPhone...
No. There's nothing special about the specs. Well, at least compared to other highend smartphones.-Quadrangulum said:However, those specs would make it about as powerful as the best smartphones today, correct?
Dr. Kitty Muffins said:I don't think its a bad idea if their only intent is to imbed the PSP into phones and extend the platforms lifespan this way. Its not like the 3DS is light years ahead of the PSP graphically.
K.Jack said:This is not SCE.
This is not SCE.
This is not SCE.
charlequin said:Errr... that's the entire point of Apple's gaming strategy. All of the profits, none of the work.
opticalmace said:If true I'm all over this. As long as it's not.... 599 US dollars.
And you're not alone. People complaining aren't seeing the big picture.neojubei said:Even thought i am sticking with my iphone 4, a andriod/psp phone sounds like something that i would buy in an instant.
This is something I will never understand. Ratios are very vague. Out of 20000 gaming apps, if 1000 is gold I really don't see the problem...the other problem is pure preference which doesnt mean a lot...DMeisterJ said:Yeah, but are we arguing what is going to make more money, or what is going to corral mobile gaming into something of note?
I could give a damn about how much money a multi-billion dollar company makes, as a gamer, I'm concerned about the games. Apple not taking the reins on iPhone gaming for the most part has led to an exorbiantly high shit:gold ratio in terms of games worth playing, nevermind the fact that playing games without buttons is about one step above sticking a needle in your eye in fun factor.
That's not the reason. The reason for those crappy titles is because that's what people with the iPhone buy. Games go where the gamers are. If there was reason to believe that a lot of people would buy $40 games on the iPhone, you would bet that $40 games would be released on the iPhone.DMeisterJ said:Yeah, but are we arguing what is going to make more money, or what is going to corral mobile gaming into something of note?
I could give a damn about how much money a multi-billion dollar company makes, as a gamer, I'm concerned about the games. Apple not taking the reins on iPhone gaming for the most part has led to an exorbiantly high shit:gold ratio in terms of games worth playing, nevermind the fact that playing games without buttons is about one step above sticking a needle in your eye in fun factor.