StickSoldier
Member
good lucky playing inferno on a ps3 controller, shit is fuckin retarded hard.
Diablo III is completely littered with abilities that are aimed on the mouse cursor and the back end of the game is very fast, requires a ton of precision and kiting and has a lot of one shot kills.
Diablo III? No. The first two? Yes.
This seems to be objectively relatively "big" news, even if it doesn't subjectively excite.This is one of those announcements that will be big to a lot of people except for me.
If online isn't required it's also going to easily be the superior version. Not because of the DRM, or their shitty servers, but simply because the game won't be able to rely on everyone having access to the auction house. Blizzard will then have to design loot drops around HAVING FUN instead of supporting their bullshit AH economy.If true this is going to be a very dumbed down version, simply because of this
Here we go: http://www.redcoon.de/B362894-Blizzard-PS3-Diablo-3_Rollenspiele-Adventure. Set for 2012.
Sources say it will be offically announced later today.
So about those sources. Same sources who said 30 vita games?
Eh, it is german online shop link in OP.
Or you mean Cyntec's source?
come on! since when has Redcoon become a reliable source for game leaks?
they're a well-known cheap online electronic retailer here in Spain, but only for tvs, digital cameras, stand alone players, audio devices, toasters, fridges and some gadgets, but games??? lol
Cyntec repeatedly said he had sources and couldnt say more or he would lose his head etc
How does the absence of a console Diablo 3 at E3 debunk this rumor?So are we waiting for Activisions conference or is this rumor debunked?
How does the absence of a console Diablo 3 at E3 debunk this rumor?
Cyntec said:Sources say it will be offically announced later today.
How does the absence of a console Diablo 3 at E3 debunk this rumor?
Oh, that rumor.This rumour in the OP:
I don't know - maybe the game is still too far away from release. It just doesn't debunk the rumor, that's all.If Diablo was coming to PS3 or Vita, don't you think Sony would have mentioned it alongside Call of Duty?
If online isn't required it's also going to easily be the superior version. Not because of the DRM, or their shitty servers, but simply because the game won't be able to rely on everyone having access to the auction house. Blizzard will then have to design loot drops around HAVING FUN instead of supporting their bullshit AH economy.
If online isn't required it's also going to easily be the superior version. Not because of the DRM, or their shitty servers, but simply because the game won't be able to rely on everyone having access to the auction house. Blizzard will then have to design loot drops around HAVING FUN instead of supporting their bullshit AH economy.
im sure even the website owner was surprised about that dramatic high hit count yesterday.
im sure even the website owner was surprised about that dramatic high hit count yesterday.
The first Diablo was on PSX-- not sure how good of a version it was though.
Didn't we have a rule which said that people with "insider sources" could get banned if they don't come out true?