Top 10 (#6) on Steam Activity today. I think it's a Gaf thing.....
It is just like lack of understanding for Fighting and Sports games.
Top 10 (#6) on Steam Activity today. I think it's a Gaf thing.....
If you are a Business and you make more money on Microtransactions and GTAO than you did with 2 large single player DLC's for GTA IV its a no brainer to not do any single player DLC for GTA V and focus on the online portion - especially if its still popular.
I wonder how the success of GTAO will impact RDR2's design.
I sometimes find that a more vocal base of people on Gaf don't really go in for MP games like this. They require some imagination and a willingness to socialise
If this is true. I don't understand.
1. WHY make the "Expansion"/dlc so late? Like last year woulda made sense, even this year would make sense. But next year? Seems just so odd and so late.
2. WHYYY would there be an expansion/dlc in 2018, after RDR2 is out? I guess PC users will like it, but console players might be on RDR2 only at that point.
It just seems like such a weird move.
What about indie games?
If this is true. I don't understand.
1. WHY make the "Expansion"/dlc so late? Like last year woulda made sense, even this year would make sense. But next year? Seems just so odd and so late.
2. WHYYY would there be an expansion/dlc in 2018, after RDR2 is out? I guess PC users will like it, but console players might be on RDR2 only at that point.
It just seems like such a weird move.
GTAO needs a serious overhaul if this is true, everything takes way too long, it's fiddly to do things, in my opinion it just doesn't work as well as it should in its current state for something they want to support for another 3 years.
I would happily buy an full priced expansion, but only if it came with a single player part. Making liberty city and these other ones from previous games feels pointless to me without a single player part. They have three great characters, bring the voice actors back and throw some missions together.
EXCELLENT
this is a good thing. Get outside your anti-social bubbles, nerds
I don't think I'd play a SP GTA V DLC this late but this is still sad news to me. I'm very, very worried about RDR2 and the next GTA games.
I fear that Rockstar may be going the Valve way.
This post seems very ignorant if I'm reading it correctly. As someone who never plays a game for its multiplayer content, how is this good news? Why should I have to rely on other people for my enjoyment? What happens to an always online game in 20 years when the servers die/retire/whatever and I want to play it then? Looking at you, Diablo 3.EXCELLENT
this is a good thing. Get outside your anti-social bubbles, nerds.
If anyone could afford to throw their single player community a bone even if it doesn't make them a bunch of profits, it's R*.
This all very much sounds like wishful thinking.
I know that most won't like it but I do. I've had way, way, way more fun with GTA online playing with friends than the single player.
Keep bringing more GTAO stuff, Rockstar.
I'm kind of curious about this, because when I played the 360 version back in the day GTA Online felt pretty much like random people crashing into each other, a couple of missions here and there, and then getting your ass capped when you went to deposit in your money in an ATM and lol all your hard work is down the drain. After that I learned you could deposit money via your phone (WHY DON'T THEY TELL YOU THIS EARLIER) but by that point I was already tired of getting ganked so I left it alone.
Wasn't GTAO Benz's idea in the first place?
Guess we won't get anything like Undead Nightmare for RDR2 as well.
Shame. Best SP DLC of last gen for sure.
Seriously. Tied with Minerva's Den for me.Guess we won't get anything like Undead Nightmare for RDR2 as well.
Shame. Best SP DLC of last gen for sure.
I would love the idea of Michael, Trevor and Franklin, doing a heist as a zombie outbreak kicks off. And them having to escape the city.