I still love that xkcd pseudocode :lol :lolitxaka said:It sure was when they made a fixed number appear as random.
I still love that xkcd pseudocode :lol :lolitxaka said:It sure was when they made a fixed number appear as random.
The Faceless Master said:sheep like you sicken me, and as one of those people you deemed expendable because your corporate overlords decided that a feature i used was fine to remove, i don't think you deserve to be called human or deserve to have the same human rights as the rest of us.
There would be no such thing as murder if we all didn't exist! Why, God, why did you put us on earth with the ability to mass-produce!The Faceless Master said:know what else facilitates piracy? designing, producing, manufacturing and making videogame hardware and software available to the general populace. if they didn't do it, it couldn't be pirated!
AND YET, THEY CONTINUE TO DO SO WHEN THE OUTCOME IS INEVITABLE
Metalmurphy said:Yeah... this cease n desist order and the impending lawsuit is just a front.
Arsenic said:There would be no such thing as murder if we all didn't exist! Why, God, why did you put us on earth with the ability to mass-produce!
Can Farmville and Angry Birds be pirated yet?The Faceless Master said:the last time i checked, the videogame industry has been growing every year. now, i know that the retail console industry has been shrinking slightly the past 2 years, but this is more than offset by the rapidly growing sectors in online casual gaming and mobile gaming.
Yeah, maybe my Google fu is weak right now but I couldn't find any Sony or retailer policy to offer refunds. In fact, I found the opposite. Sony, defending their right to remove functionality as agreed to in their TOS, and various retailers forwarding customer concerns to Sony, except for a few individual cases.itxaka said:Also you haven't show any proof that anyone got their money back. I didn't get my money back. The distributor told me to fuck off. Sony told me to fuck off. I went to consumer rights and Sony told the to fuck off.
Arsenic said:Can Farmville and Angry Birds be pirated yet?
AFAIK only a handful of people in Europe managed to do that. It definitely wasn't something that everyone could do.NullPointer said:Yeah, maybe my Google fu is weak right now but I couldn't find any Sony or retailer policy to offer refunds. In fact, I found the opposite. Sony, defending their right to remove functionality as agreed to in their TOS, and various retailers forwarding customer concerns to Sony, except for a few individual cases.
Actually I'm painting the picture that WE don't have the right to do whatever we want.itxaka said:Man, you are painting the picture like Sony having all the rights to do whatever they want and users not able to do the same with the hardware they payed for.
Also you haven't show any proof that anyone got their money back. I didn't get my money back. The distributor told me to fuck off. Sony told me to fuck off. I went to consumer rights and Sony told the to fuck off.
Then to fuck off with Sony. Thankfully there are guys out there that enable the consumers to exercise their rights instead of bending over corporations and shills that love those big corporations and dismiss other people rights labeling them as stupid, minority or entitled.
Arsenic said:Can Farmville and Angry Birds be pirated yet?
joshcryer said:Angry Birds went to ad-only on Android for the sole reason of piracy.
Piracy rate on Android (for good games) is 90%+.
That question was serious by the way. I wasnt aware games on the istore can be ripped and used on the phone (angry birds was a bad example, as i know its available elsewhere too)Jobiensis said:Angry Birds can definitely be pirated. You could argue that using an ad blocker with facebook is similar to pirating.
Metalmurphy said:Actually I'm painting the picture that WE don't have the right to do whatever we want.
As for proof, there's a moderator here, I forgot who, that got money back. And there's myself. I got a full 599 refund in a time where consoles were already 399, but didn't play PS2 games.
Metalmurphy said:Actually I'm painting the picture that WE don't have the right to do whatever we want.
As for proof, there's a moderator here, I forgot who, that got money back. And there's myself. I got a full 599 refund when in a time where consoles were already 399, but didn't play PS2 games.
Jobiensis said:I mean how does this in any way relate to the statement you made. The original ?? was probably how they would use it to teach without making it public. But professors like to figure out how things work and then tell everybody how they did it.
If that's truly the case I'm leaning more towards Sony being the one asking for trouble.angelfly said:AFAIK only a handful of people in Europe managed to do that. It definitely wasn't something that everyone could do.
edit: link http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/ps3-owner-gets-other-os-refund
Mine wasn't through Sony either. Where the responsibility lies I dunno, but I do know my rights.itxaka said:Iapetus was the one who got the refund, and I'm pretty sure it was thanks to Amazon, not Sony.
See, you just contradicted yourself. Your liberties end when they affect others. And that's exactly what's happening here, and why I find no problem what so ever with Sony trying to stop this.itxaka said:And yes, we have the right to do whatever we want with the hardware we buy as long as we don't steal, hurt or in any way cause anything bad to others with it. That would include pirating games, cloning the ps3 and selling it for less money or hitting your wife in the head with it.
Running linux on it? A stupid ftp server? That doesn't hurt anybody. It creates value for the hardware, like when the OG xbox was viewed as an awesome HTPC for cheap. They haven't released a backup loader, they haven't helped people get copies running there. They only have showed the world how Sony fucked up with the console security and released an alternate FW that only allows homebrew.
Metalmurphy said:Mine wasn't through Sony either. Where the responsibility lies I dunno, but I do know my rights.
See, you just contradicted yourself. Your liberties end when they affect others. And that's exactly what's happening here, and why I find no problem what so ever with Sony trying to stop this.
Metalmurphy said:Mine wasn't through Sony either. Where the responsibility lies I dunno, but I do know my rights.
Do you really need me to tell you? I'd just be repeating what's been said over and over in this thread. And it's not speculation, it is happening, it will continue to happen.itxaka said:Don't ignore the rest of my post when I explain what I mean please. Tell me how this is hurting the ps3.
How is that any different? They would be depriving me of a feature I had (like removing OtherOS), and as such I wanted my money back.acidspunk said:Your case was different. Didn't they refund you because they didn't have any other ps3s with ps2 compatibility or something? I honestly don't remember.
phosphor112 said:Last time I checked no professor has hacked a console (or hardware device) and gave the whole public a private key to digitally sign anything they wanted.
I completely agree Sony should not have removed OtherOS, even IF it wasn't used by 99% of the community. I say that as a non-user myself. I'm also angry that Sony failed to respond to constant requests over the years about cross-game chat and numerous features that competitors have. They have to expect that people will find a way to resolve these issues themselves (legally or not).itxaka said:Iapetus was the one who got the refund, and I'm pretty sure it was thanks to Amazon, not Sony.
And yes, we have the right to do whatever we want with the hardware we buy as long as we don't steal, hurt or in any way cause anything bad to others with it. That would include pirating games, cloning the ps3 and selling it for less money or hitting your wife in the head with it.
Running linux on it? A stupid ftp server? That doesn't hurt anybody. It creates value for the hardware, like when the OG xbox was viewed as an awesome HTPC for cheap. They haven't released a backup loader, they haven't helped people get copies running there. They only have showed the world how Sony fucked up with the console security and released an alternate FW that only allows homebrew.
Great post.Clear said:Yeesh. I really was hoping to restrain myself from posting in this thread -opinions are so entrenched on both sides there's very little debate to be had- but this comment is so perfectly asinine I had to respond.
Dear Tinfoilhatman,
the world does not solely revolve around you, and exist to serve your interests and desires. For those of us with no particular interest in Linux, homebrew or piracy, all GeoHot and his fellow hackers have achieved is to create a colossal mess that is in no way going to enrich our enjoyment of our PS3's.
In fact, the need for heightened network security is quite likely to do the reverse. Everything in business has a cost attached, and if time/resources are being spent bolstering defences (both legal and technical) those funds will have been diverted from elsewhere. In simple terms, every user is going to feel the impact even if its the simple inconvenience of being forced to install additional firmware updates that would otherwise not be neccessary.
Why is this happening again? Sony may well have been planning to remove OtherOS support, but the impetus to patch it out so suddenly was demonstrably driven their desire to prevent hacker attacks. You can't point the finger of blame at Sony in isolation for this - frankly their desire to protect their business seems like a far more reasonable rationale than the desire to prolong service of a feature that -at least to my knowledge- had produced precisely nothing of general public interest for over 3 years.
Is it really so unreasonable after spending billions of dollars developing a system that has barely started to turn a profit that they Sony should want to protect their investment at all costs? I mean its not like they are the industry dominating super-power of years gone by, they are the ones struggling this generation. Desperate times demand desperate measures and all that.
Your comments also strongly indicates that you feel Sony should be in deathly fear of the hackers, is that *really* such a desirable situation for, well, anybody? It surely doesn't seem like a sweet deal for regular users like me who also payed good money for his console and now apparently should be looking forward to buying a new system because this one is "finished". Great. Mind if I bill you for my replacement PS4?
After all, there is -according to you- nothing that Sony can do at this point. Going after the hackers via the courts is just going to make things worse, because they are beyond the law apparently... Sheesh I wish these all-powerful people would use their revolutionary superpowers to do something generally constructive like bring peace to the middle-east or something... as opposed to bringing a system *I LIKE* to its knees in a gaudy display of people power (or Terrorism if you're a fan of the Patriot act <rolls eyes>).
Seriously though, Geohot's blatant self-promotion in publically disseminating the crypto-keys and pushing out his custom firmware kit so visibly is just begging to elicit a legal response from Sony. For such a "smart" kid it seems extraordinarily naive for him to expect anything less. And that being the case isn't it completely cut-and-dried as to who is driving this debacle forward? It isn't Sony.
Call me old-fashioned but I expect my Hackers like other "outlaw" types to wear masks, ore at least a leetized pseudonym. From where I sit he couldn't have made himself a more obvious target had he painted a bullseye on his skinny ass.
If he's done nothing wrong, or he's really as smart as he thinks he is, let him prove it in court. Seems fair enough to me.
The bottom-line is this: The ability to run unlicensed code is not just about free-warez and the media center of your dreams. Its about being constantly concerned that Sony will somehow detect your modified system and kick you off PSN. Its about being cockblocked by "surprise" OFW releases that need to be modded by some enterprising hacker and downloaded from some uncertain source before you can enjoy their benefits.
Its a big bag of arseholes, Tinfoilhatman. Its hassle, and worry, and for what exactly? You will never be able to use PSN with the same level of confidence and carefreeness that a legit user will.
One last thing. It doesn't matter whether you believe EULA's are legally binding or not. You should be in absolutely no doubt that Sony believe they are, and will take steps to enforce their view in any and all business transactions with them. If you don't like the deal, you should take your custom elsewhere. Taking the cavalier attitude that you can choose to ignore the terms they have been at pains to lay out for you is not honourable in any way. Its just the kind of legalistic dickery you are complaining that big-business is guilty of.
You really don't have the moral high-ground you think you have.
Peace & Love.
PS. I have absolutely no intention of posting again in this thread. So don't bother calling me out on any of my cranky opinions - I just needed to get this off my chest.
Metalmurphy said:Actually I'm painting the picture that WE don't have the right to do whatever we want.
As for proof, there's a moderator here, I forgot who, that got money back. And there's myself. I got a full 599 refund in a time where consoles were already 399, but didn't play PS2 games.
Metalmurphy said:How is that any different? They would be depriving me of a feature I had (like removing OtherOS), and as such I wanted my money back.
Unless itxaka pirates and does any of those bad things, what does that have to do with his actions?Metalmurphy said:Do you really need me to tell you? I'd just be repeating what's been said over and over in this thread. And it's not speculation, it is happening, it will continue to happen.
The discussion moved over to either the good outweighs the bad, and imo no, it really doesn't.
UM...I don't care how it affects you at all. The hack will affect me positively so allow me to remind you that the world doesn't revolve around you either.Clear said:Yeesh. I really was hoping to restrain myself from posting in this thread -opinions are so entrenched on both sides there's very little debate to be had- but this comment is so perfectly asinine I had to respond.
Dear Tinfoilhatman,
the world does not solely revolve around you, and exist to serve your interests and desires. For those of us with no particular interest in Linux, homebrew or piracy, all GeoHot and his fellow hackers have achieved is to create a colossal mess that is in no way going to enrich our enjoyment of our PS3's.
LOL so you are a kid with no ability or stamina to stand by your rants...yeah, I'll be sure to take you more seriously in the future.Clear said:PS. I have absolutely no intention of posting again in this thread. So don't bother calling me out on any of my cranky opinions - I just needed to get this off my chest.
you're comparing real effects to hypothetical effects that may happen in the future?Metalmurphy said:See, you just contradicted yourself. Your liberties end when they affect others. And that's exactly what's happening here, and why I find no problem what so ever with Sony trying to stop this.
itxaka said:And yes, we have the right to do whatever we want with the hardware we buy as long as we don't steal, hurt or in any way cause anything bad to others with it. That would include pirating games, cloning the ps3 and selling it for less money or hitting your wife in the head with it.
Running linux on it? A stupid ftp server? That doesn't hurt anybody. It creates value for the hardware, like when the OG xbox was viewed as an awesome HTPC for cheap. They haven't released a backup loader, they haven't helped people get copies running there. They only have showed the world how Sony fucked up with the console security and released an alternate FW that only allows homebrew.
In a way... yeah. I mean... You can't use linux yet, or XBMC, or have ingame screenshots, video capture, all the great things being mentioned here. Yet you can already pirate games that were unpirated before because of this.The Faceless Master said:you're comparing real effects to hypothetical effects that may happen in the future?
good: homebrewMetalmurphy said:The discussion moved over to either the good outweighs the bad, and imo no, it really doesn't.
You know you're setting yourself up for an onslaught of replies :lolThe Faceless Master said:good: homebrew
bad: ???
you already paid for the ability to use the software when you bought the hardware.Raist said:Yeah, you surely have the right to do whatever you want with your hardware. You can use your PS3 as a hammer if you please. Problem is, JB, custon firmware etc, is based on modifications of software, which isn't exactly yours.
Oh shit son! Guess piracy is legal now!The Faceless Master said:you already paid for the ability to use the software when you bought the hardware.
so, we're back to CFW = Piracy?Metalmurphy said:Oh shit son! Guess piracy is legal now!
The Faceless Master said:good: homebrew
bad: ???
Are we?The Faceless Master said:so, we're back to CFW = Piracy?
3rdman said:UM...I don't care how it affects you at all. The hack will affect me positively so allow me to remind you that the world doesn't revolve around you either.
LOL so you are a kid with no ability or stamina to stand by your rants...yeah, I'll be sure to take you more seriously in the future.
The Faceless Master said:so, we're back to CFW = Piracy?
i'm asking. you tell me.Metalmurphy said:Are we?
The Faceless Master said:you already paid for the ability to use the software when you bought the hardware.
Piracy? of Castlevania? the vast majority of games don't even work.Lothars said:Bad: Piracy
Guy Legend said:You missed his point. Piracy negatively affects the majority of legit users as he pointed out. Money is being spent here when it could be spent on something service/fun oriented.
Why are you asking me though? I don't think you need me to tell you that no, CFW != PiracyThe Faceless Master said:i'm asking. you tell me.
They do now. And guess who caused that...The Faceless Master said:Piracy? of Castlevania? the vast majority of games don't even work.
what limits? any artificially implied limit in an EULA or TOS still has to actually stand up in court.Raist said:Within certain limits. Just like a movie or whatever.
then what was the point of your reply?Metalmurphy said:Why are you asking me though? I don't think you need me to tell you that no, CFW != Piracy
Not sure where you're getting at...
a Sony Engineer that is probably fired now?Metalmurphy said:They do now. And guess who caused that...
You should re-read what you posted.The Faceless Master said:then what was the point of your reply?
And?The Faceless Master said:a Sony Engineer that is probably fired now?