Yearsoflurking
Member
i assume most are just trollingIt's seems to be a problem with a lot of Phil threads lately.
i assume most are just trollingIt's seems to be a problem with a lot of Phil threads lately.
Signed exclusives?
Thought he was against that on Monday.
Ye like they did with Phantom Dust then he fucked over said developer and made them close their doors you mean that right?
wonder if the rumored leak about exclusive capcom projects and exclusive obsidian (different one) project are what he is referencing.
But they don't like to announce stuff early.2 years means we are going to see some of those E3 2018
He says he's against exclusive content where things are exclusive to one version of a game and not available to the other versions of the game.
He didn't say he's against exclusive games period. Why do I need to explain this to people?
MS seems to be moving to a model where they aren't running studios and instead farming out work.
What about console launch exclusives that hold content back from a majority of the gaming audience for 3-12 months?He says he's against exclusive content where things are exclusive to one version of a game and not available to the other versions of the game.
He didn't say he's against exclusive games period. Why do I need to explain this to people?
If the game is releasing in spring 2019, it would be at E3 2018But they don't like to announce stuff early.
Tomb Raider 3 better not be 100% exclusive
Do you guys have no reading comprehension? He's giving an example that's shows he is actively signing games and that he doesn't want to show games of to early. Not that any new games they have coming won't be for another 2-3 years. Do you guys not read the OP, going by the OP's title choice he didn't either if he thought that was thread worthy.
I think Phil's hands are tied. He clearly knows Xbox doesn't have enough games, but you see how he passes the buck to Nadella. Microsoft probably doesn't want to give his division the money it needs to develop exclusive games.
console exclusives most of the time exist because of dev size or budget. they sign with one or the other for funding. or sometimes just because they can't do both consoles right now.What about console launch exclusives that hold content back from a majority of the gaming audience for 3-12 months?
It just *feels* weird, even though what he is saying isn't wrong.
I'm an Xbox owner (I say owner because I have nothing to PLAY on the damn thing) who is sick and tired of him promising games and pretending they're investing in them. It's been years (almost a decade?) since he was head of MS Studios, and 3 years since he became the head of XBox. Where the hell are the results of those "investments" he's been talking about the entire time?I don't think the majority of Xbox players have turned on him. I'm seeing the same rage from the same people in just about every Xbox thread. No matter the subject.
show me dont tell me yadda yadda yadda
And again, he's not actually against them.He says he's against exclusive content where things are exclusive to one version of a game and not available to the other versions of the game.
He didn't say he's against exclusive games period. Why do I need to explain this to people?
But I thought he didn't like exclusive deals?
I thought that exclusives were holding back the industry or something. Can't keep up with Spencer.
Signed exclusives?
Thought he was against that on Monday.
No, I understand full exclusives. Console launch exclusives come to both consoles, just one first for a determined amount of time.console exclusives most of the time exist because of dev size or budget. they sign with one or the other for funding. or sometimes just because they can't do both consoles right now.
2 years from now would be E3 2019. I think fall 2019 is more likely. It also aligns with MS' usual release pattern.If the game is releasing in spring 2019, it would be at E3 2018
But I keep reading on here in quotes from Phil that Xbox is a huge part of Microsoft and is being fully backed. Are you saying that is not the case OR are we making excuses for Phil? I mean its either Microsoft is fully pushing and backing the Xbox OR Microsoft is hamstringing Phil's budget to support the Xbox.
Show us or shut up Phil. He's so full of shit.
Wtf!?? Tell you what? Lol, that the first half of this year was filled with exclusive games on PS4? And they're still more to come? Even this month? What are you on?
You actually think they don't have more games to show!?? That's playable right now!!? Just keep riding the waves bro. 😂
Pretty much. A shortened hype cycle does wonders.
Are you guys being intentionally obtuse? you can't seriously not see the difference between a exclusive content deal and first party (which it is not second party or third party) contract for the creation of a game. One is a shitty deal that withholds content from another platform (the deal he's against) the other is a situation like Detroit, a game made by a dev that Sony don't own that is funded by them. With Detroit being a IP they own, but you obviously came into the thread without reading the thread with the intention of make a snide remark that was predisposed.
like Metroid Prime 4?
So the Nintendo Co Ltd model?
like Metroid Prime 4?
So you mean like how Microsoft won't release the Minecraft update on PS4? Gotcha.
This sounds concerning for 2018
Signed exclusives?
Thought he was against that on Monday.
Nah.Playground? Playground.
2018 will have:
-RDR2
-Anthem
-Forza Horizon 4
-Halo 6
-Sea Of Thieves
Yeah, no concerns.
Misunderstood your post.2018 will have:
-RDR2
-Anthem
-Forza Horizon 4
-Halo 6
-Sea Of Thieves
Yeah, no concerns.
Nah.
Thinking RDR2 is going to be MS exclusive? Lmao
The year after will likely have nothing from First paty apart from Forza 8.
.I've found that a lot people just read the thread title and have to get a witty response in before anyone else.
Nah.
i meant console launch actually my badNo, I understand full exclusives. Console launch exclusives come to both consoles, just one first for a determined amount of time.
just like i think sony has games they havent shown, i too think that msft have game they havent shown.
no need to say that phil is "full of shit"
Are you guys being intentionally obtuse? you can't seriously not see the difference between a exclusive content deal and first party (which it is not second party or third party) contract for the creation of a game. One is a shitty deal that withholds content from another platform (the deal he's against) the other is a situation like Detroit, a game made by a dev that Sony don't own that is funded by them. With Detroit being a IP they own, but you obviously came into the thread without reading the thread with the intention of make a snide remark that was predisposed.