it was the pinnacle of the series IMO.
Agree. It's only going down from here on.
it was the pinnacle of the series IMO.
I'm wondering if the version of the movie that all the Critics got to see last week was a different cut of the film. Because they seem to love it, and I mean, really really love it, and out of the 15 or so coworkers, friends, family members I have discussed the film with since Thursday, there have only been 2 people who enjoyed it. Everyone else seems to agree with my criticism, so there seems to be some sort of extreme dissonance occurring that I haven't seen with a film in a long time.
I think it's safe to say ...
... as much as I don't like saying it, that TLJ is not a well-made movie. That is what surprised me the most. I liked the last 2 Disney SW movies. They weren't perfect and had flaws but they were entertaining and carefully crafted. TFA left me with a lot of questions. TLJ, at this point, I could care less about what happens in the next movie.
Two things really rubbed me wrong with TLJ. First of all, I was surprised by how cheesy many of the special effects looked. I wonder if my theater's projection screen was not calibrated, but the CGI really stood out to me, especially during scenes like when Finn and the girl were on horses or other various action scenes. Even with the prequels, I always left the theater pretty blown away but the crazy special effects ... and it wouldn't be until years later after those effects aged, did I personally notice how bad hey had become in relation to the new movies being made today. But in TLJ, I felt on many occasions, I was surprised with the bad CGI. There were a few amazing special effects in TLJ but there were also a lot of crummy effects too, in my opinion.
The second thing I could not stand about TLJ, which I firmly believe people will come around and agree with me after the hoopla of its release dissipates, is the entire Finn and Girl arc-plot. Who was this girl? Why was she in the movie? Those scenes were painful and boring, and I felt were just made to give Finn something to do. The movie was 2 and half hours long; they could have cut that entire 40-minute segment out and made a much more compelling and tightened movie. I have never felt bored in a star wars movie, even with the prequels I was never consistently bored for long bouts of time. But the first hour of this movie was cringy, and my friends and I were whispering utter disbelief at how much we were not enjoying it.
In the end, what hurts the most, and I specifically use the word 'hurts' on purpose, is that I never thought in a million years, a SW film could be made so disjointed. I have enjoyed all the films, to include the prequels to a certain extent, up to now. I have my favorites and my least favorable ones, but I always felt were all made with a concentrated effort and creativity. This one, just feels wrong and weird; the editing, the pacing, the plot points?
I could be wrong on this, but when Force Awakens was first released in December 2015, at that time, this movie (the last Jedi) was scheduled to be released in spring of 2018. However, when the force Awakens blew up the box office, Disney decided they were going to have a new star wars release every December. I could be mis-remebering this, but regardless, I feel the version of The Last Jedi in theaters right now is the first or second cut of the final film. It is not edited tightly enough to be in the caliber of the two previous SW films. I look forward to reading or watching interviews with crew members behind the scenes to see if this release was rushed out the door.
Overall, I thought it was a poor movie. It had some exciting scenes, interesting themes, and some decent surprises ... but as a complete movie; no way. I'm seeing people saying it is better than Empire, but honestly, I think this movie is prequel level of clunky oddness that sometimes works and a lot of times, does not.
I'm wondering if the version of the movie that all the Critics got to see last week was a different cut of the film. Because they seem to love it, and I mean, really really love it, and out of the 15 or so coworkers, friends, family members I have discussed the film with since Thursday, there have only been 2 people who enjoyed it. Everyone else seems to agree with my criticism, so there seems to be some sort of extreme dissonance occurring that I haven't seen with a film in a long time.
Walked out the cinema in disbelief. Nothing to do with "locked fan theories" going in beforehand like some are saying to those who are not positive. Just felt it wasn't a good movie, it felt messy, pacing/editing all over the place, wooden dialogue and performances, the score overusing themes when a character appeared on screen, characters trying to one up the previous one liner from a previous scene.
I actually like the idea of doing something different with a franchise, it helps prevent staleness but it's all in the overall execution which I feel was flat. The cinematography was gorgeous though, the island Luke lives on, wonderfully shot.
I don't think you did, they out did Phantom Menace stupidity in this one but at least we could laugh that off with TPMDefinitely asking myself if I've seen the same movie as some of the people in here.
If I had to give a score for the Disney Star Wars Movies:
TFA: 7/10
Rogue One: 6/10
TLJ: 9/10
Luke milking a space slug for milk?
LEIA FLYING IN SPACE?
Snoke and Rey having no backstory?
And I don't think Johnson even watched TFA, he must of just come in and said "nope, fuck that and that!" to everything in TFA " And fuck the other 6 films too."
The Prequal Trilogy are masterpieces compared to TLJ.
Oh.It showed she was able to master the Force much like her brother was. It was a completely badass moment.
I think it's safe to say ...
... as much as I don't like saying it, that TLJ is not a well-made movie. That is what surprised me the most. I liked the last 2 Disney SW movies. They weren't perfect and had flaws but they were entertaining and carefully crafted. TFA left me with a lot of questions. TLJ, at this point, I could care less about what happens in the next movie.
Two things really rubbed me wrong with TLJ. First of all, I was surprised by how cheesy many of the special effects looked. I wonder if my theater's projection screen was not calibrated, but the CGI really stood out to me, especially during scenes like when Finn and the girl were on horses or other various action scenes. Even with the prequels, I always left the theater pretty blown away but the crazy special effects ... and it wouldn't be until years later after those effects aged, did I personally notice how bad hey had become in relation to the new movies being made today. But in TLJ, I felt on many occasions, I was surprised with the bad CGI. There were a few amazing special effects in TLJ but there were also a lot of crummy effects too, in my opinion.
The second thing I could not stand about TLJ, which I firmly believe people will come around and agree with me after the hoopla of its release dissipates, is the entire Finn and Girl arc-plot. Who was this girl? Why was she in the movie? Those scenes were painful and boring, and I felt were just made to give Finn something to do. The movie was 2 and half hours long; they could have cut that entire 40-minute segment out and made a much more compelling and tightened movie. I have never felt bored in a star wars movie, even with the prequels I was never consistently bored for long bouts of time. But the first hour of this movie was cringy, and my friends and I were whispering utter disbelief at how much we were not enjoying it.
In the end, what hurts the most, and I specifically use the word 'hurts' on purpose, is that I never thought in a million years, a SW film could be made so disjointed. I have enjoyed all the films, to include the prequels to a certain extent, up to now. I have my favorites and my least favorable ones, but I always felt were all made with a concentrated effort and creativity. This one, just feels wrong and weird; the editing, the pacing, the plot points?
I could be wrong on this, but when Force Awakens was first released in December 2015, at that time, this movie (the last Jedi) was scheduled to be released in spring of 2018. However, when the force Awakens blew up the box office, Disney decided they were going to have a new star wars release every December. I could be mis-remebering this, but regardless, I feel the version of The Last Jedi in theaters right now is the first or second cut of the final film. It is not edited tightly enough to be in the caliber of the two previous SW films. I look forward to reading or watching interviews with crew members behind the scenes to see if this release was rushed out the door.
Overall, I thought it was a poor movie. It had some exciting scenes, interesting themes, and some decent surprises ... but as a complete movie; no way. I'm seeing people saying it is better than Empire, but honestly, I think this movie is prequel level of clunky oddness that sometimes works and a lot of times, does not.
I'm wondering if the version of the movie that all the Critics got to see last week was a different cut of the film. Because they seem to love it, and I mean, really really love it, and out of the 15 or so coworkers, friends, family members I have discussed the film with since Thursday, there have only been 2 people who enjoyed it. Everyone else seems to agree with my criticism, so there seems to be some sort of extreme dissonance occurring that I haven't seen with a film in a long time.
Come on this is like defending Shumacker's Batman or independence day resurgenceThis doesn't make sense.
You disliking decisions that were made doesn't mean Rian said, "Fuck TFA!"
Yeah Wow.Oh.
Oh, wow.
I'm wondering if the version of the movie that all the Critics got to see last week was a different cut of the film. Because they seem to love it, and I mean, really really love it, and out of the 15 or so coworkers, friends, family members I have discussed the film with since Thursday, there have only been 2 people who enjoyed it. Everyone else seems to agree with my criticism, so there seems to be some sort of extreme dissonance occurring that I haven't seen with a film in a long time.
As an example, some of the effects, props, looked fake. This may have been intentional, as a way to reference back to the original films for us old people.
his screening and he mentioned a scene where Chewbacca shows up to pickup Rey in the falcon after her encounter with Kylo and Snoke. I don't recall seeing that scene in the movie.
Come on this is like defending Shumacker's Batman or independence day resurgence
Surprised people were upset with no Snoke back story, i mean did you feel the same way about Palpatine in ep 5,6 because we knew nothing about him and he got killed. If anything Kylo Ren is a better villain than Vader because Kylo killed his master to fulfill his destiny, be completely unhinged and in control whst vader just died.
We only got the back story of palpatine almost two decades later.
Did u just say snoke is more integral to kylos story than palpatine was to vader? I mean it literally is the same story, they were both influenced by the dark side for a reason and they both pulled the strings on their apprentice only thing different is like kylo said he actually is a monster and killed his master solidifying his darkness. Kylo doesnt care for light or dark as he said in the movie he just wants to be a monster. And now he can be with snoke out of the way. Kylo is now the supreme leader and the face of death no longer snoke.the snoke character is more directly related to kylo's arc than the emperor ever was for vader. vader wasnt half the character kylo is with regards to how the scripts have been written. surely this should be obvious. excluding snoke's presence and his role in turning kylo is a huge missed opportunity that (retro)actively weakens all elements of both films (TFA and TLJ). its a gap that absolutely should have been filled.
Surprised people were upset with no Snoke back story, i mean did you feel the same way about Palpatine in ep 5,6 because we knew nothing about him and he got killed. If anything Kylo Ren is a better villain than Vader because Kylo killed his master to fulfill his destiny, be completely unhinged and in control whilst vader just died.
We only got the back story of palpatine almost two decades later.
Did u just say snoke is more integral to kylos story than palpatine was to vader? I mean it literally is the same story, they were both influenced by the dark side for a reason and they both pulled the strings on their apprentice only thing different is like kylo said he actually is a monster and killed his master solidifying his darkness. Kylo doesnt care for light or dark as he said in the movie he just wants to be a monster. And now he can be with snoke out of the way. Kylo is now the supreme leader and the face of death no longer snoke.
This is why although I don't agree with Rian direction I'm accepting it and will see how JJ spins it.What people seem to forget is that the baton is being handed back to the person who asked these questions in the first place - questions that have either not been answered in this film, or answered in a way to intentionally rile the audience.
Turnabout is fair play, I think JJ will have fun contradicting some assumptions made about this film the same way Rian did to him.
The big "questions" from TFA were answered perfectly in TLJ.
Not that "who is Snoke" was ever actually a question from TFA. It was nothing more than fan theories. Thankfully, Rian didn't play into that nonsense.
Where does this super powerful Snoke come from? What is he not a sith? Why is he so powerful? Luke while teaching Ben knew of Snoke, so how and why? How does Snoke even come into leadership of the first order?
Are you sure you even watched the movie? How do you not know how the girl is? How do you not know how she met Finn?
Surprised people were upset with no Snoke back story, i mean did you feel the same way about Palpatine in ep 5,6 because we knew nothing about him and he got killed.
Palpatine works because his existence flows logically from the accepted tenets of the established universe. The audience accepts that an Empire has an Emperor, and he's mentioned as existing in ANH. It's clear that Vader, Tarkin, and the Moffs at the board room meeting in ANH are answering to this guy. It's explained that somehow Vader was seduced to the dark side and trained in the dark arts, so it logically flows that the person Vader answers to was a powerful dark sider. The Emperor's confirmation as the dark side Master of Vader in ESB confirms a lot of assumptions that audience was already making and relieves the audience of questions. The Emperor never comes out of nowhere.
Snoke doesn't work as well because this new trilogy is a continuation and so the audience believes that they're in full possession of the backstory and so things better flow logically. To begin with the First Order's existence and military strength is already shaky ground, but Snoke's existence contradicts a lot of assumptions that the audience has been making. Why is he so powerful in the dark side? He would have to be trained by Palpatine or Vader, but Snoke was never mentioned in the original trilogy. I thought Vader helped the Emperor hunt down and destroy force users. Snoke is also pretty old, and if Palptine and Vader could sense Luke's disturbance in the force, why couldn't they sense Snoke's? Questions, questions, questions.
In short, Palpatine is the answer to most of the assumptions the audience has been making, while Snoke contradicts everything and raises dozens of questions that the audience is justified in demanding satisfying answers to. Reveals that answer questions are satisfying, reveals that contradict assumptions and are left unanswered are discomforting.
I don't think you did, they out did Phantom Menace stupidity in this one but at least we could laugh that off with TPM
And I don't think Johnson even watched TFA, he must of just come in and said "nope, fuck that and that!" to everything in TFA " And fuck the other 6 films too."
but opinions and all.
The Prequal Trilogy are masterpieces compared to TLJ.
About the same, it had its silly moments but there is a lot of stand out moments that will always be rememberble.I really like what you said and agree.
My own ratings
TFA: 5/10, really rough, really dumb, but not bad. Could have gone places
Rogue One: 7/10, a good genre movie.
TLJ: 2 or 3/10 and i don't want to rewatch it to find out how bad it really is. i wasted about 3 hours of my life on this shit. There's a few specks of good scenes and themes scattered in this shit nugget, but it's not worth digging through it to get at them. Awful experience and I'm not going to bother with the third movie after this.
BTW, what do you rate TPM? I have it at a 6.
By tossing it away or ignoring it? That's shit.Johnson trying somewhat to clean up the shit established by TFA.
Palpatine works because his existence flows logically from the accepted tenets of the established universe. The audience accepts that an Empire has an Emperor, and he's mentioned as existing in ANH. It's clear that Vader, Tarkin, and the Moffs at the board room meeting in ANH are answering to this guy. It's explained that somehow Vader was seduced to the dark side and trained in the dark arts, so it logically flows that the person Vader answers to was a powerful dark sider. The Emperor's confirmation as the dark side Master of Vader in ESB confirms a lot of assumptions that audience was already making and relieves the audience of questions. The Emperor never comes out of nowhere.
Snoke doesn't work as well because this new trilogy is a continuation and so the audience believes that they're in full possession of the backstory and so things better flow logically. To begin with the First Order's existence and military strength is already shaky ground, but Snoke's existence contradicts a lot of assumptions that the audience has been making. Why is he so powerful in the dark side? He would have to be trained by Palpatine or Vader, but Snoke was never mentioned in the original trilogy. I thought Vader helped the Emperor hunt down and destroy force users. Snoke is also pretty old, and if Palptine and Vader could sense Luke's disturbance in the force, why couldn't they sense Snoke's? Questions, questions, questions.
In short, Palpatine is the answer to most of the assumptions the audience has been making, while Snoke contradicts everything and raises dozens of questions that the audience is justified in demanding satisfying answers to. Reveals that answer questions are satisfying, reveals that contradict assumptions and are left unanswered are discomforting.
I just listened to an hour long WGA Q&A with Rian Johnson from yesterday and he explains why there was no Snoke backstory.
His explanation was that he was done writing TLJ before JJ had finished Episode VII. So he basically wrote the movie before all of these fan theories came out and people started to put so much importance on wanting to know more about Snoke. For him, he didn't really want to do another Emperor/Vader dynamic because that had been done before. He felt like when writing Episode VII, for Kylo to grow as a character, to get to the place that Kylo needed to be by the end of the movie, then Snoke had to go. Rian didn't say it in so many words, but the feeling I got from him was that Snoke was much more of a pawn to Kylo than Kylo was to Snoke. The entire gist of his explanation is that this is much more Kylo's story than it is Snoke's so what are you going to spend your writing time and screen time working on? The person that the entire story or trilogy is about, or someone who really wasn't all that important in telling the story of the journey of one of the main, if not THE main character.