TheShocker
Member
Depends on how it affects resolution. I play on a C2 OLED so I have 120hz and VRR, but I do appreciate a crisp image. Also, sometimes 120hz containers elevate black levels and Starfield already has a fucked up black point.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Starfield could REALLY use a 40 fps+ mode on console
- Thread starter Mythoclast
- Start date
HeisenbergFX4
Gold Member
I don't think Xbox is going to release a pro console but I do think its highly possible they start the next generation before Sony does since they are releasing a pro next year
Bernoulli
M2 slut
in 2 or 3 years they will release either a pro or a new gen
with all the studios they have it is smart to keep all the games and release them for the new gen at the start
HeisenbergFX4
Gold Member
I think we have seen the last of the consoles launching side by side
Bojji
Member
If developers can't utilize more than 6 cores there is no need for 12.
Imtjnotu
Member
Negotiator101
Member
Few updates down the line you never know they might.
Mythoclast
Member
Easy to say this when you haven’t tried it at 60.
DeaDPo0L84
Member
Me over here playing @ 120fps, max settings, on an ultrawide monitor:
Mythoclast
Member
Im gonna install it on my 3070 laptop with 32 gb RAM and see how far I can take itMe over here playing @ 120fps, max settings, on an ultrawide monitor:
twilo99
Member
I play it on 6800xt and an xss.. I would say whatever they’ve done on the Xbox would be acceptable for most.
Of course, I prefer the PC experience, but that’s way more expensive.
Last edited:
Sleepwalker
Member
I only accept the 30 when streaming it on the deck, wont even consider playing it on the xbox.
Neo_game
Member
Let us see if this will become the trend going forward. 60fps may be a limitation of the hardware but 40fps mode for those who have the TV should definitely be considered.
Last edited:
Justin9mm
Member
So I started this up yesterday on Series X, I have made my character and got to the first enemy conflict at the start with the pirates. I was very underwhelmed with the gunplay / aiming and shooting. It felt very stiff, please tell me this gets better? I had to put it down after that. Will continue tonight but it didn't feel great. This was in first person perspective. Also no Atmos support which annoys me.
Last edited:
THE DUCK
voted poster of the decade by bots
No that's 30fps for you. Went from that to pc at 60 and to me it felt a lot better to play.
Still has a bit of that "bethesda" clunkyness but still much better.
Ovech-King
Gold Member
Feasible if they bring down the resolution scale from 66% (1440p) straight to 50% which then would be 1080p . That's the only way they can free 10 more fps beside perhaps lowering one or two key graphic settings
Feel Like I'm On 42
Member
What does that even mean?
Feel Like I'm On 42
Member
Or when you're blind. Or if they're an Xbox fanboy. Can't stand people who have no clue about how framerate works and yet still feel they're in a position to talk about said performance.
TonyK
Member
I have the same feeling than when I played Redfall, that the 30fps feels very good in these games, and I'm totally sure it's because there is no option to switch to 60fps and compare. So when you are forced to play at 30fps during a few hours, you get used and it feels almost as smooth as 60fps. In reality is a placebo, but it works and I think is the reason because we all enjoyed 30fps games in the past, because outside of PC there was no option to switch to 60fps in console for specific games.
Said this, yes, I want a 40fps mode for Starfield.
Said this, yes, I want a 40fps mode for Starfield.
MarkMe2525
Member
They have to shake it up somehow, so this makes sense. It just isn't good business to keep going directly head on with Sony at this point.
Tarnpanzer
Member
The LC C9 I bought more than 4 years ago has it, so...
Games profit much more from better single core performance than sheer number of cpu cores.
In the end all draw calls are created and dispatched to the GPU from a single CPU core.
lh032
I cry about Xbox and hate PlayStation.
Err That doesn't mean anything
Tarnpanzer
Member
No, of course not...
FunkMiller
Member
Playing on an LG CX and frankly, it’s fine.
Same, but with Trumotion (natural) turned on. Pseudo 60 fps. Works well, with occasional artifacts. Worth a try for those with an LG Oled as I much prefer that setting over 30fps.
wouldn’t that add latency, like crazy amounts of it
Ulysses 31
Member
Not so much on OLEDs with their fast response times.
DryvBy
Member
It means it odd when moving the camera around like it's stuttering.
Yes it does, but for me it's not noticeable. Test yourself and find out.
Loomy
Thinks Microaggressions are Real
Nah, you just need a new PC
Mr Reasonable
Completely Unreasonable
Thanks for bumping it up to the top of the forum, making sure more people get to add their views.
three_muffins
Member
...like you just did?
plague had it, third party though
Last edited:
Mr Reasonable
Completely Unreasonable
The difference is that I don't care. I don't post on threads I'm not interested in, I just scroll past.
three_muffins
Member
You care enough to post and reply.
Mr Reasonable
Completely Unreasonable
No, you misunderstand. I'm happy to have an exchange with you on this subject. I'm saying to you that if you bump threads you don't want to see to the top of the pile (repeatedly now!) then you're sort of curating a bad experience where you keep seeing things you're not interested in at the top of the page.
I don't mind looking at what people are saying in this thread, it's why I clicked on it initially.
I also don't mind replying to you to point out the role you're playing in bumping this thread. I don't care if it's at the top of the forum all day. That's what I don't care about.
If the thread were about something I'm not interested in, I would scroll by.
That is my position on threads I do or do not care about and how I deal with those threads. Hope that helps.
Sorry this got bumped again.
