Elfforkusu
Member
Based on Debian straight up? Interesting!
And awesome! No weird Canonical shenanigans!
And awesome! No weird Canonical shenanigans!
Why is UEFI a requirement?
Why is UEFI a requirement?
Why is UEFI a requirement?
Probably because all their test machines use it and they didn't want to bother developing/testing their OS for something without it.
UEFI is just a BIOS replacement, I don't think it has any effect on how the OS functions, at least it shouldn't considering every other OS works with both.
And now I will keep an eye on twitch.tv for potential streams...
Every other OS also supports Intel graphics. Supporting something takes effort, and I would imagine that Valve didn't want to take the effort to support computers that don't use UEFI.
Angry AMD users should be angry at AMD for years of OpenGL/Linux neglect.
That would only be the case if UEFI/BIOS need driver support from the OS and even if they did, Debian (what SteamOS is based on) already supports both. Why would Valve remove support? Or rather what feature could Valve have added to make UEFI mandatory?
Might have to do with stuff like power management or thermal control or something? As far as I understand, those things can be handled by the UEFI independently of the OS - and those things are quite important for small, console-like boxes.That would only be the case if UEFI/BIOS need driver support from the OS and even if they did, Debian (what SteamOS is based on) already supports both. Why would Valve remove support? Or rather what feature could Valve have added to make UEFI mandatory?
Nvidia is disliked by the more zealous part of the free software community due to providing closed-source drivers. That is understandable. However, their closed source OpenGL drivers work and are actually competitive feature- and performance-wise with their Windows ones (and even on Windows their OpenGL support and performance are already generally better). And that's what's important for a company like Valve when trying to put something like Steam machines on the market.Its weird, now maybe its due to me not gaming on Linux and just using Linux for servers, but my impression was always that AMD was much more Linux friendly. It was Nvidia who were bad in terms of Linux support.
Manually downloading the drivers was suggested on steam forums. Reported HDMI connection allowed TV sound.I got it running! As stated above, game launches are much smoother than Linux BPM. I have no sound in the entire OS though (I tried all my plugged in audio devices, which admittedly are too many).
Popped out to the desktop, and it looks like the kernel isn't detecting any sound hardware at all. I wonder what I can do about that...
Based on Debian straight up? Interesting!
And awesome! No weird Canonical shenanigans!
How long has UEFI been around? Will it work on my circa 2007 intel mobo?
UEFI is meant to replace the Basic Input/Output System (BIOS) firmware interface, present in all IBM PC-compatible personal computers.[1][2] In practice, most UEFI images provide legacy support for BIOS services. UEFI can support remote diagnostics and repair of computers, even without another operating system.[3]
The original EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) specification was developed by Intel. Some of its practices and data formats mirror ones from Windows.[4][5] In 2005, UEFI deprecated EFI 1.10 (final release of EFI). The UEFI specification is managed by the Unified EFI Forum.
[...]
The EFI specification defined a UGA (Universal Graphic Adapter) protocol as a way to support device-independent graphics. UEFI did not include UGA and replaced it with GOP (Graphics Output Protocol), with the explicit goal of removing VGA hardware dependencies. The two are similar.
UEFI 2.1 defined a "Human Interface Infrastructure" (HII) to manage user input, localized strings, fonts, and forms (in the HTML sense). These enable OEMs or IBVs to design graphical interfaces for pre-boot configuration. UEFI itself does not define a user interface.
Most early UEFI implementations were console-based, but as early as 2007 some implementations featured a graphical user interface.
source
I get errorMy roommate did a quick overview if anyone wants to see if it's worth installing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS4sTG_Fueg
My roommate did a quick overview if anyone wants to see if it's worth installing. It's just extremely barebones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS4sTG_Fueg
Pfft. I can literally just click big picture mode and I'm using SteamOS.
Agreed. I'm hoping they have a little more customized desktop. Gnome is great and all but I was hoping for some steam integrated stuff.Pfft. I can literally just click big picture mode and I'm using SteamOS.
Agreed. I'm hoping they have a little more customized desktop. Gnome is great and all but I was hoping for some steam integrated stuff.
My God.
Has anyone gotten this thing installed yet?
That doesn't seem like the point of steam OS.
The point of SteamOS is so Valve doesn't have to rely on anyone . I don't see what that has to do with my comment.That doesn't seem like the point of steam OS.
Pfft. I can literally just click big picture mode and I'm using SteamOS.
Exuro said:Agreed. I'm hoping they have a little more customized desktop
Manually downloading the drivers was suggested on steam forums. Reported HDMI connection allowed TV sound.
If you want to "emulate" the steamos big picture in windows, first enable steam beta updates from the settings. Then create shortcut for the steam.exe and add -bigpicture -steamos to launch options. Then just click the chortcut.
I'm just waiting on a video / pictures of it. ._.
..it's big picture mode.
Thanks for the link!
I did install alsa-base via the debian repos, but it didn't help.
However, plugging my computer into my TV fixed everything. Looks like it's no joke that Steam OS is for set top Steam Machines - audio and video work out of the box super smooth over HDMI.
Launching and exiting games is MUCH BETTER than PC or Linux BPM - it feels like a console. It's hard to describe what I mean by this, except that there's a smooth transition where the UI fades out and the game fades in, rather than a window popping over like a traditional OS. I played Super Meat Boy, Fez, Rogue Legacy, and Monaco with no tearing or issues whatsoever. Some more intense games like Brutal Legend, Trine 2 and Strike Suit Zero are installing now.
I'm much more impressed than I thought I would be. For now, this is definitely not something to install on your main box - Steam OS is not hooked up to the right repositories to easily install other applications. But as a console equivalent it's better than I expected by a long shot.
*edit* as for booting, they haven't 100% gotten rid of the slight "dirt" of a Linux boot - you see grub for a fraction of a second before it auto forwards you to the Steam booter. Other than that and the fact that you see your BIOS, it could be a console boot. It's also super slow on my drive, but I'm using an old 400GB drive my girlfriend had lying around which doesn't have a lot of life left in it.
*edit2* It was my perspective that they were looking for a system that smoothly boots into BPM and smooths out the game->steam->game transitions of BPM. And they have achieved that. I should try and install EUIV and see what happens with it's launcher, though.
Not if you're not on Ubuntu you aren't.
But yeah: Right now it's just Ubuntu booting into Steam Big Picture automatically until you tell it "no, I want to go to Desktop" (kinda like Win 8 and Mehtro. *GASP*) and then it's a "normal" Unbuntu machine.
May come later, but hopefully that's something on Valve's agenda since KDE/Gnome both leave a little more to be desired in comparison to Windows/OS X's GUI/interfaces.
My roommate did a quick overview if anyone wants to see if it's worth installing. It's just extremely barebones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS4sTG_Fueg
I have a system that boots into XBMC and I can launch steam big picture mode straight from that. All using a Xbox controller. I have emulators launching from within steam also. What benefits would Steam OS provide for me?
Right now I can't see any.
Why is UEFI a requirement?