Sotha Sil said:I can't picture a new villain that would fit in Nolan's low-camp Batman universe. The Riddler would have been good.
Hugo Strange.
Sotha Sil said:I can't picture a new villain that would fit in Nolan's low-camp Batman universe. The Riddler would have been good.
If ever there was a villainous that was strictly for the fanboys its harly.TekkenMaster said:I'm hoping for a dangerous, edgy, crazy Harley Quinn. And Catwoman too.
Anticitizen One said:Would have prefered "Shadow of the Bat"
Sho_Nuff82 said:Or Two Face not being dead.
Takao said:The Dark of the Moon is a better title, and even that's not a good title.
_dementia said:Does anyone know if it will feature a re-cast Joker?
_dementia said:Does anyone know if it will feature a re-cast Joker?
Nah, The Dark Throne, Winged Knight or The Killing Joke would suffice.OneMoreQuestion said:Does Dark Knight: Rising or Rising of the Dark Knight sound better?
Basically, yea.btkadams said:i hate the fact the title has the dark knight in it again. it makes it seem as if the dark knight was the first movie in a series or something and this new one is the second movie.
Mike M said:Eh, I wasn't a huge fan of Batman Begins as a title either, but over time I grew numb to it. I already don't dislike The Dark Knight Rises as much, so I'm sure I'll get used to it.
they probably want to distance themselves from the shitty halle berry movie toobadcrumble said:Guess I might as well hope for Hush, Deadshot, and/or Black Mask.
I'm praying that Catwoman isn't in this; I like Selina a lot, but I can't see her fitting into the """Nolanverse."""
Lyonaz said:Talia Al Ghul and Ra's return! I want more Liam Neeson please.
Meus Renaissance said:In all seriousness, the imagery doesn't work there. Rise? He didn't "fall", and there isn't anything upcoming about the character to suggest a revitalisation. I don't the title should be similar to its predecessor. Anything with the 'Dark Knight' would have been terrible by default. "Rising" is just :lol
God no:lol :lolTakao said:The Dark of the Moon is a better title, and even that's not a good title.
I'm okay with this if they cast Christopher Walken for the role.Kworn said:I think it will be a totally new original Villian never seen before in comic or film
I think it's an awful idea in general, and a fantastic idea under your conditions.Kurtofan said:I'm okay with this if they cast Christopher Walken for the role.
Does it fucking matter at all? Seriously.confused said:Shit title is shitter than shit.
Meus Renaissance said:Dark Knight Rises sound like a college made film costing $400, trying to draw in the hipster crowd with the title.
In all seriousness, the imagery doesn't work there. Rise? He didn't "fall", and there isn't anything upcoming about the character to suggest a revitalisation. I don't the title should be similar to its predecessor. Anything with the 'Dark Knight' would have been terrible by default. "Rising" is just :lol
CajoleJuice said:The third movie curse begins.
Dark Knight with a Vengencebrandonh83 said:How absurdly creative!
Should have been "The Dark Knight II: Knight Harder"
Solo said:The worst part of this title is how thinly vieled the attempt to cash in on TDK is. BB and TDK are sequels but they have distinctly different titles, like Batman 3 should have had. But TDK makes $500M, so WB decides Batman 3 needs to also have The Dark Knight in its title.
Solo said:The worst part of this title is how thinly vieled the attempt to cash in on TDK is. BB and TDK are sequels but they have distinctly different titles, like Batman 3 should have had. But TDK makes $500M, so WB decides Batman 3 needs to also have The Dark Knight in its title.
Indeed. I cannot wait for DM to endure his Spider-Man 3 :lol