Sounds like a real leap forward in designing a more independent AI partner.
Well there is that I suppose.
Personally I don't think anything should get 10/10 unless it's GOAT material
Back up to 83, we bought to catch FF15 son! lol
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/the-last-guardian/critic-reviews
So if a teacher assigns you an essay to write, with multiple criteria to meet, and she gives you a 100(or 10/10) what do you say then?
Using numbers to measure quality is inherently arbitrary. But its what humans decided to do. Knowing that allows us to understand that when something/one scores a 100 or 10/10 it doesnt mean the game or paper was perfect.
Scales for grading are only concrete and conpletely objective when the test taken is standardized. If not the influence of sudjective criticism comes into play.
None of the 4s are in thou
http://time.com/4588009/the-last-guardian-review/
"Impatient players may balk at the way Trico sometimes ignores them, or how much time can pass before hell act in accord with their wishes. That would be a mistake and a misreading. The games contemplative sequences are as meaningful and essential as its fast and furious ones. Trico can be mercurial, adolescently willful and sometimes maddeningly stubborn, but he is always knowable. What he requires most is your patience, a virtue discarded by the handholding school of game design, an assumption provocatively challenged by Ueda throughout The Last Guardian."
Yeah. What criteria is there to meet for a game to receive a 10/10 really.
Hate is personal. Rating it a 4, is disrespect with the creators. I wouldn't rate Halo 4/10 just because I don't like it.
I think the difference between above-average scores (yes, 6 is above average. Basic math) and really high scores is this point of contention:
From Gamespot's review
None of the 4s are in thou
Wow, what's next? Water is wet and the sky is blue? 😉Yep. Because we all know Final Fantasy VII is the perfect FF game
The influence of subjective critism has always been in play. A game score isn't a test or formula. A 9/10 versus 10/10 doesn't 1/10th of the game is missing or lacking compared to the other.So if a teacher assigns you an essay to write, with multiple criteria to meet, and she gives you a 100(or 10/10) what do you say then?
Using numbers to measure quality is inherently arbitrary. But its what humans decided to do. Knowing that allows us to understand that when something/one scores a 100 or 10/10 it doesnt mean the game or paper was perfect.
Scales for grading are only concrete and conpletely objective when the test taken is standardized. If not the influence of sudjective criticism comes into play.
Or it could just be what they felt the game should recieve. It's crazy, I know.
All of you guys saying games can't be perfect.....
I don't want to derail here but Final Fantasy 6
I don't read all sites, but rather sites that have historically provided me with good guidance and called out the kind of issues that I also care about. I put very little stock into review averages, but I do take advice from reviewers whom I have come to respect and whose perspectives often align with my own.Multiple reviewers didn't mention the Trico issues at all. Doesn't mean the criticisms aren't valid - but if you had read three different reviews that never mentioned the issue, would you be buying the game right now?
Yeah, that's essentially the point I was making earlier.
I think the other key detail from these reviews is that your companion is an abused animal. Showing patience and care is important
None of the 4s are in thou
If I got a 65/100 on any project or assignment I'd quit in shame if I didn't die of embarrassment first.
US would be falling behind in Math even more if 65 was considered anywhere near acceptable performance in Math classes.
No, 65/100 is super bad. Like you're just plain trash bad.Off-topic, but it's ridiculous to think that you are getting more rights than wrong (65/100) and you are considered failing it.
Anyway, back to the review thread.
He's actually the worst though. His Twitter avi is that stupid "Don't tread on me" rattlesnake...
And he's not using it ironically 😱
If I got a 65/100 on any project or assignment I'd quit in shame if I didn't die of embarrassment first.
US would be falling behind in Math even more if 65 was considered anywhere near acceptable performance in Math classes.
No, 65/100 is super bad. Like you're just plain trash bad.
If the exam or project or whatever is graded on a 100 point scale, it was made in mind with the fact that even the most basic understanding of the material will allow you to get at least 70% of the questions correct. Practical tests similarly assign you a 70% for "barely competent". Tests that expect the average person to only get 50% or so, like the MCAT or whatever, are graded on different scales because sub-70 is a trash score.
Never thought I'd see the day when making an AI unresponsive was something worthy of praise.
From watching gameplay footage, every animal I've ever owned (like 6 cats and a few dogs) have been more responsive and quick to acknowledge me whenever I do something out of the ordinary.
This is why games media should just go school grades. We all know what an A is, and what a B is.
We don't all have the same idea of what a 7/10 or an 8/10 are.
Never thought I'd see the day when making an AI unresponsive was something worthy of praise.
From watching gameplay footage, every animal I've ever owned (like 6 cats and a few dogs) have been more responsive and quick to acknowledge me whenever I do something out of the ordinary.
Or it could just be what they felt the game should recieve. It's crazy, I know.
Your cat or dog probably wasn't abused and confined, which is where the reviews state Trico starts.Never thought I'd see the day when making an AI unresponsive was something worthy of praise.
From watching gameplay footage, every animal I've ever owned (like 6 cats and a few dogs) have been more responsive and quick to acknowledge me whenever I do something out of the ordinary.
Could be that poster is referring to the actual quality of the article. (I don't know.)
This is why games media should just go school grades. We all know what an A is, and what a B is.
We don't all have the same idea of what a 7/10 or an 8/10 are.
You haven't watched enough later footage then. Trico becomes much more responsive later onNever thought I'd see the day when making an AI unresponsive was something worthy of praise.
From watching gameplay footage, every animal I've ever owned (like 6 cats and a few dogs) have been more responsive and quick to acknowledge me whenever I do something out of the ordinary.
Never thought I'd see the day when making an AI unresponsive was something worthy of praise.
From watching gameplay footage, every animal I've ever owned (like 6 cats and a few dogs) have been more responsive and quick to acknowledge me whenever I do something out of the ordinary.
Pokémon Sun and Moon somehow both the best RPG and pet simulator of 2016.Man this is BORING! How the hell did both TLG and FFXV come away with low to mid 80s averages!? This should've been extremes one way or the other.
Oh well, I'm glad these games came out ok and really hit home with some people.
Yeah this doesn't look much different than any big release that doesn't hit the 90+ range
lots of 7s and 8s with the occasional 9.
Back up to 83, we bought to catch FF15 son! lol
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/the-last-guardian/critic-reviews
School is lenient if anything. At your job if you screw up 35% of your projects you better start getting that resume ready.Off-topic, but it's ridiculous to think that you are getting more rights than wrong (65/100) and you are considered failing it.
Anyway, back to the review thread.