I think that's a thing for Microsoft. Not demanding to own the IP. Microsoft isn't doing bad in second place though. They aren't going to beat Sony in sales. I think they know that with their PC plan.
I also think they know 1st party just isn't as important as forums like to pretend. They don't drive systems the way 3rd party do. Which is why having something like COD as the main marketer is such a big thing. They have tentpole franchises and go about their other IP by contracting. There's just no need to be financially responsible for a studio beyond funding a game.
There has not been a shortfall of exclusives this gen. That's just false. Getting studios hasn't dried up. Making deals on games they didn't start has though.
How? They're both tps with time manipulation mechanics. If you're going to debate play style changes and weapon differences and additional abilities then I'm going to do the same. The point is, the framework of the games is more or less unchanged, regardless of the details, because it's the details that make them new IP and distinguish them.While I don't agree BB is DS4, BB is a fuckton closer to DS than QB is to MP.
Like, not even comparable.
Budgie made a deal with MS to make a certain amount of Halo games for them, they're just as much at fault.If MS was smart, they would have let Bungie create Destiny as an xbox/PC exclusive, while still forming 343 to continue Halo.
But nah, gotta hold studios down to one franchise
The third party libraries of both consoles are largely the same so MS need to find other ways to differentiate themselves. Exclusives are one such way. Xbox One would be in a terrible place without Halo (I know I wouldn't have bought one were it not for Halo 5 and MCC) but instead of allowing Black Tusk to come up with a new IP to rival Halo, they turned them into the Gears studio. IMO that's a great shame.
What big second party game reveals have MS made in the last 12 months? All I can think of is State of Decay 2 and Forza Horizon 3.
The Ori, Below, Sunset Overdrive, Titanfall, Ryse, Quantum Break, Scalebound, Cuphead and D4 deals were signed before the Xbox One was even released.
The second party well has been drying up and there isn't the first party lineup to compensate.
For xbox one to be a success now, Sony needs to fail hard, which could happen if they rest on their laurels, like MS did last gen.
Which is why it's become increasingly important to stay on side with indie developers. That is where the diversity and variety is coming from for the most part now.
So how do you explain the 30m gap if it not being for exclusives?
If MS was smart, they would have let Bungie create Destiny as an xbox/PC exclusive, while still forming 343 to continue Halo.
But nah, gotta hold studios down to one franchise
No....no they didn't. Unless second place to the Wii is a victory.
Launching at the same time as your competition at a reasonable price/ undercutting themSo how do you explain the 30m gap if it not being for exclusives?
Sony is the biggest name in gaming and that isn't hard to know. They've won 3 gens in a row. Two of them blowouts. They even gave a year head start last gen and came out on top despite begin beat in a couple regions.
They had a dominant lead before Naughty Dog, Santa Monica or Polyphony, ever released a PS4 game. (Tlou is cross gen.) Before Uncharted...before GOW...before GT released. They have been crushing it.
Exclusives don't dominate sales threads so why would it be the main reason they sell the console? Why would Sony make deals with the biggest 3rd party franchises if their 1st party were all that were needed?
So, typical gaming article with zero facts, figures, or any data whatsoever to back it up.
And no, the very premise of the article is completely wrong. The success of a console rides on its marketing. Microsoft completely fucked up their launch and basically every mainstream marketing push since then, that's why the X1 is in the toilet. If they would have stayed the course that they set with the first 5 years of the 360 they would be actually competing with Sony, if not outright beating Sony, but instead they misjudged the market and tried to aggressively expand what a "console" is and in trying to get non-gamers to purchase an X1 they completely alienated their base.
Conversely, Sony has been on-point with the PS4's marketing. They correctly judged what the average gaming consumer wants to see and just keeps delivering it to them. Sony wasn't really concerned with trying to grow the consumer base, they knew the market was there and that it was big enough to sustain their business. So they went about recapturing existing consumers that they had lost to the 360.
Why ? I think Coalition is doing a great job with the Gears series, more than what 343i is doing with Halo, 343i killed Halo for me with Halo 4/5 but Gears 4 looks like a GOTY contender.
Exclusives don't dominate sales threads so why would it be the main reason they sell the console? Why would Sony make deals with the biggest 3rd party franchises if their 1st party were all that were needed?
I was very happy with Halo 5 and I wanted to see Black Tusk's new IP more than I wanted a Gears 4. Just my opinion!
Because both are important.
We're going round in circles here...
Yes I would say Rocket League is a new IP. This is ridiculous.to the people saying that Bloodborne is not Demon's souls 4 because if it is then titanfallQB are CODMax Payne
would you say that Overwatch is Team Fortress 3 ? ofcourse not because they are completely different like TF to COD and Quantum break to Max payne
Demon's souls and it's sequels, Dark souls and Bloodborne, have the same situation as supersonic acrobatic rocket-powered battle-cars and Rocket league, same game, different name, would you say that Rocket league is a new IP ?? not SARPBC 2 but with a new name ?
So how do you explain the 30m gap if it not being for exclusives?
to the people saying that Bloodborne is not Demon's souls 4 because if it is then titanfall\QB are COD\Max Payne
would you say that Overwatch is Team Fortress 3 ? ofcourse not because they are completely different like TF to COD and Quantum break to Max payne
Demon's souls and it's sequels, Dark souls and Bloodborne, have the same situation as supersonic acrobatic rocket-powered battle-cars and Rocket league, same game, different name, would you say that Rocket league is a new IP ?? not SARPBC 2 but with a new name ?
just a friendly reminder, do not get excited about Gears 4, it's gonna be nowhere near as good as Halo 5, sure Halo 5 campaign was bad but the multiplayer was one of the best in this generation, but Gears 4 MP was trash from what i and many have played in the beta, and the campaign is not looking good at all from the trailers
if Gears 4 gets 80+ MC score, it would be a HUGE surprise for me
this remind me of Quantum break\Order 1886\No man's sky before release, everyone is so hyped about them and i felt sorry for them because i knew they will flop so hard and they did, so my advice to everyone is don't get hyped about a game that obviously looks mediocre
Yeah, they've definitely put out a lot of great new IP. It's just a shame that it looks like very few of them will get sequels. If that nerd leaks rumor is right, Ori will be the first new IP from MS this gen to get a sequel.They have at least tried this gen thus far.
Ryse
Ori
Sunset Overdrive
Sea of Thieves
Quantum Break
ReCore
Scalebound
Cuphead
These are all brand new IP that weren't all necessarily created by Microsoft, but partially exist because of them. Hard to argue they aren't at least trying.
Yes I would say Rocket League is a new IP. This is ridiculous.
For xbox one to be a success now, Sony needs to fail hard, which could happen if they rest on their laurels, like MS did last gen.
What? Bloodborne was a sales success at launch.I understand where you're coming from, not a lot of people bought Bloodborne when it came to the PS4 install base, not a lot of people bought Sunset Overdrive, but it's those things that help build a positive repertoire and brand image with the people who are invested. Sure I absolutely agree that most success is down to effective marketing and multiplats, but that portfolio can do wonders for brand image more than anyone can think.
They need diversity badly. Also, it seems like the xbox market is unfortunately not very conducive to diversity. Do you think something like bloodborne, last gaurdian, or most jrpgs would survive as xbox exclusives?
Because Sony have lots of successful new IP's for ps4, right ?, every single new IP sony made for PS4 is a disappointment, don't tell me Bloodborne, because it's just Demon's souls 4
the only new IP from sony that could be a success is Horizon, we will have to wait and see
meanwhile Xbox one had Sunset Overdrive and Ori and the blind forest and both of them are underrated as hell because they are amazing
to the people saying that Bloodborne is not Demon's souls 4 because if it is then titanfall\QB are COD\Max Payne
would you say that Overwatch is Team Fortress 3 ? ofcourse not because they are completely different like TF to COD and Quantum break to Max payne
Demon's souls and it's sequels, Dark souls and Bloodborne, have the same situation as supersonic acrobatic rocket-powered battle-cars and Rocket league, same game, different name, would you say that Rocket league is a new IP ?? not SARPBC 2 but with a new name ?
No....no they didn't. Unless second place to the Wii is a victory.
just a friendly reminder, do not get excited about Gears 4, it's gonna be nowhere near as good as Halo 5, sure Halo 5 campaign was bad but the multiplayer was one of the best in this generation, but Gears 4 MP was trash from what i and many have played in the beta, and the campaign is not looking good at all from the trailers
if Gears 4 gets 80+ MC score, it would be a HUGE surprise for me
That's your opinion.
They need diversity badly. Also, it seems like the xbox market is unfortunately not very conducive to diversity. Do you think something like bloodborne, last gaurdian, or most jrpgs would survive as xbox exclusives?
Over 500k retail in opening NPD.
NMS is loling at you
I'd say that up til now exclusives have not matters this gen because there hasn't been any outstanding exclusives. However, if I were buying a new console right now I'd definitely go for the PS4 for its exclusives. When you include PSVR, PlayStation has so many must have exclusives and console exclusives coming out within 6 months.
Looking long term the PS4 adds...
- Horizon: Zero Dawn
- RIGS
- Battlezone
- Eve Valkyrie
- Star Trek Bridge Crew
On the Xbox One side I only have two upcoming must have exclusives
- God of War
- Detroit
- Spiderman
- Days Gone (?)
To be honest, I am being generous to have Gears of War 4 on that list because I didn't buy the last Gears game, Gears of War: Judgment.
- Halo Wars 2
- Gears of War 4(?)
Yes, I think opening at 100k in the U.K. And 500k in the US at retail would be considered a big success for an IP only available on one platform (for the purpose of these figures and the charts). For the record this is better than the majority of other exclusive software this gen.
Microsoft just needs exclusives more geared(hehe) towards their audience. I'd be readying an Xbox One purchase if I knew that new versions of old exclusives like MechAssault, Deathrow, Crimson Skies, and ShadowRun were in the works.
Depends on how you define successful new IP. If you define it as launching an IP that built enough hype to sustain a series, then NMS isn't a success. At this point, if Hello games were to announce No Man's Sky 2, nobody would care. In fact, being a sequel to NMS would hurt future sales more than it would help it.
No, I don't remember this happening at all.Remember when Sony wanted us to jump for joy at the sight of Kratos making his return at E3 (with a kid and a beard in tow, no less) but we groaned at another resurrected first-party series, instead clamouring for the new post-apocalyptic wilderness of Days Gone.
I'm still surprised they don't have a first party WRPG. Games like Kotor, Fable, and Mass Effect 1 were defining parts of early Xbox/360. They even have Casey Hudson at MS now! It's a shame that Obsidian game was cancelled.Microsoft just needs exclusives more geared(hehe) towards their audience. I'd be readying an Xbox One purchase if I knew that new versions of old exclusives like MechAssault, Deathrow, Crimson Skies, and ShadowRun were in the works.
Show me some evidence for all of these returns at retail. Please.Pretty sure that number doesn't account for the tidal wave of full refunds that were given out after the fact. Hard to call that a success.
Not to mention the permanent damage this has done to future sales of the game.
It sold mostly 1 million at launch accounting WW + digital.Depends on how you define successful new IP. If you define it as launching an IP that built enough hype to sustain a series, then NMS isn't a success. At this point, if Hello games were to announce No Man's Sky 2, nobody would care. In fact, being a sequel to NMS would hurt future sales more than it would help it.
Do you have the refunds numbers? No... at all accounts it didn't reach 5% of overall sale unless you show more accurate info.Pretty sure that number doesn't account for the tidal wave of full refunds that were given out after the fact. Hard to call that a success.
Not to mention the permanent damage this has done to future sales of the game.
But they are pretty diverse, don't you think? Sure, you've got your Halos and your Gears of War but also Ori, ReCore, Quantum Break, Cuphead, Scalebound, Forza Horizon, Tomb Raider was exclusive for a year, Fable (RIP) was very different. What else is left? A full on JRPG that's what's left MICROSOFT WHERE'S LOST ODYSSEY 2?!
I totally forgot Sunset Overdrive. But hey, so did the average consumer.
to the people saying that Bloodborne is not Demon's souls 4 because if it is then titanfall\QB are COD\Max Payne
would you say that Overwatch is Team Fortress 3 ? ofcourse not because they are completely different like TF to COD and Quantum break to Max payne
Demon's souls and it's sequels, Dark souls and Bloodborne, have the same situation as supersonic acrobatic rocket-powered battle-cars and Rocket league, same game, different name, would you say that Rocket league is a new IP ?? not SARPBC 2 but with a new name ?
This quote from the article is quite amusing:
No, I don't remember this happening at all.
>VR
>Must have
Is this bait
Also, Halo Wars 2 isn't looking to hot, and the response to the last beta was tepid at best
You're just moving goal posts to pretend it isn't successful. It was second last month in sales and now it's '' to sustain a series?" Any lengths to make something worse than it is, huh?
It sold mostly 1 million at launch accounting WW + digital.
That defines success no matter how anybody try to spin.
I'm still surprised they don't have a first party WRPG. Games like Kotor, Fable, and Mass Effect 1 were defining parts of early Xbox/360. They even have Casey Hudson at MS now! It's a shame that Obsidian game was cancelled.
Perhaps advertise a new IP by implementing a beta with an already popular IP. Like how Crackdown had the Halo 3 beta inside the disc for the 360.Wasn't Halo 5 immensely popular online despite the lack of a good single player?
I am also sure GOW will be really good when it comes judging latest previews.
MS has tried to create new IPS such as Quantum Break, Ryse, Sunset Overdrive, etc.
Problem is that most don't purchase anything that is not GOW, Halo, Or Forza when it comes to Xbox and THAT is the real problem!