Thanks to this i was able to turn a level 78 archgriffin into confetti.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt - Hearts of Stone |OT| Heroes of Gwent
- Thread starter Karl Hawk
- Start date
Thanks to this i was able to turn a level 78 archgriffin into confetti.
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
Yeah, I beat the game on deathmarch and it was rarely too hard. However, the DLC was very unbalanced in that there were a few enemies that could one-shot me even with the difficulty set on Just the Story. I certainly made it through, but for the difficulty being set at something that wasn't supposed to be a challenge, I was surprised at how often I was challenged. I had one instance in the DLC that was far more frustrating and aggravating that anything on my deathmarch run in the main game. I was playing on NG+ and maybe it was a glitch, but towards the end of the expansion you go inside the Oxenfurt academy and there are level 65 witchhunters AND there was one witchhunter that had a skull above him and even with a fully cast Quen, he could still one shot me when I was at level 68. You also couldn't block or counter his attacks. After about seven deaths and much raging over how cheap and frustrating it was I finally took the bastard down by spamming Aard. I am certain it may have been a glitch though.
I had to look up a youtube video. Quests on a timer are some of the dumbest things in video games.
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
If you're talking about the quest I think you're talking about, why it is a big deal? Its not like the save doesn't reload if you fail
First try I explored all the pathways and found out where to go, second try I made a beeline to the objective. It's really not that bad
Finished the DLC up finally. I appreciate that CDPR tried experimenting with a lot of different things here. New bosses, different types of quest gameplay like the party and reconstructing scenes, and just having such a different tone than the main game.
Not all of it hit. I didn't enjoy some of the bosses and I thought the last quest was a drag. Even though the bosses had fairly interesting patterns to learn and fight through, they were designed in a somewhat frustrating way that goes against the mobility you're allowed. I rarely ever found myself slogging through fights in the main game but I did feel like combat was a bit of a chore here. But overall a great DLC and a standard setter for the rest of the industry. Blood and Wine might as well be a new game if we're going by this.
Not all of it hit. I didn't enjoy some of the bosses and I thought the last quest was a drag. Even though the bosses had fairly interesting patterns to learn and fight through, they were designed in a somewhat frustrating way that goes against the mobility you're allowed. I rarely ever found myself slogging through fights in the main game but I did feel like combat was a bit of a chore here. But overall a great DLC and a standard setter for the rest of the industry. Blood and Wine might as well be a new game if we're going by this.
matrix-cat
Member
Yeah, didn't like that. Especially when it culminates in a puzzle that you're only likely to get to as the timer's ticking its last ticks. I ended up looking at a walkthrough, because the pressure of a timer is anathema to trying to work out a puzzle that involves steering Geralt's unresponsive ass around tight confines
That bit, and a couple of moments exploring the "Scenes from a Marriage" manor that was just too fucking dark to see the spectres I was trying to fight in, are the only sore spots for me in an absolutely wonderful 17ish hours of Hearts of Stone-ing. Fell in love with my GOTY of the year all over again. Hearts of Stone felt like it was exclusively populated with that specific kind of quest that sticks with you above all the dozens of others you've experienced in a normal playthrough; just all killer, no filler. I can't wait to see what they do with Blood and Wine.
LonelyGreyWolf
Banned
The least you could do is at least mention what the quest is, because I sure as heck don't remember a quest with a timer.
LonelyGreyWolf
Banned
I really hope that's not what he's referring to, because that would be so stupid. The timer adds so much to that level. It's supposed to be stressful. And even then, I finished it with about half the time left, so they do give you a lot of time.
Turin Turambar
Member
Oh. It makes sense, it's a section without combat, so the only challenge is that timer. You eliminate it, you eliminate all the challenge. I did it on my second try, which would mean that quest was easier than most of the boss fights where I died 4-6 times.
Meccanical
Member
Just completed, overall it was excellent especially for the price.
The bosses were hard as shit but each one had something that could be exploited to get a win if you tried hard enough.
The ending sequence made me feel smart.
The bosses were hard as shit but each one had something that could be exploited to get a win if you tried hard enough.
The ending sequence made me feel smart.
They do once you figure out a few things to reach the goal faster but it took me 2 tries and the loading screen doesnt help the situation,also I kept it vague because this is not a spoiler thread....but anyway,I got it after 2 tries so yeah,but I just hate stuff like this for the reason I mentionned initially and what a few others said...stressful can be done in a lot of other ways then this...like you know,a hard Boss fight like the Caretaker etc etc...
LonelyGreyWolf
Banned
Man, I had no idea what I was doing. I was mostly running around going "omg, holy shit". And I still did it first try with half of the time left. So long as you don't stop and fight everything, it really is a piece of cake. I can see it from your perspective, but I can't agree that it was poorly designed in any aspect. The whole point of it was the timer. It was a unique and interesting fight.
Also, you can post spoilers in this thread too, as long as you use spoiler tags. You can use spoiler tags by writing [*spoiler] without the asterisk.
spleenpoker
Member
Sorry if this has been asked before but considering all the patches this game has gone through, which version performs better? Xbox One or Ps4?
Exentryk
Member
Nice! That build was for NG, but looks like it works decently in NG+ too. The aard intensity would need to be a lot higher to knock down every enemy though, so might need some tweaks in NG+.
Denton
Member
JohnnyFootball
GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
illusionary
Member
Indeed. The quest rewards are entirely different as well.
MrOogieBoogie
BioShock Infinite is like playing some homeless guy's vivid imagination
Figured I'd get quicker responses ITT than in the performance thread.
I just got this game and was wondering if it's running as well as it can on my system.
i3-2100
GTX 960 2GB
8GB RAM
Averaging 50-60fps, although I've played only a tiny portion of the beginning. Getting some tearing during cutscenes.
What's everyone's opinion of vignetting? Should I turn it on or off? What other settings should I adjust for optimal performance?
I just got this game and was wondering if it's running as well as it can on my system.
i3-2100
GTX 960 2GB
8GB RAM
Averaging 50-60fps, although I've played only a tiny portion of the beginning. Getting some tearing during cutscenes.
What's everyone's opinion of vignetting? Should I turn it on or off? What other settings should I adjust for optimal performance?
lordfuzzybutt
Member
You can bump down Grass Density to high.
MrOogieBoogie
BioShock Infinite is like playing some homeless guy's vivid imagination
Okay, cool. Btw, possible to play the game with a Wii U Pro controller?
Exentryk
Member
Should be able to. Use a software that disguises Wii U pro to appear as Xbox controller for the game. I use Inputmapper to make DS4 appear as Xbox controller and it works perfectly.
Vignetting is a minor minor hit, it makes the edges of the screen darker, like in a film, I like it personally.
nVidia has a really good break-down of all the options and their performance impacts.
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/gu...-hunt-graphics-performance-and-tweaking-guide
I would bump textures down from Ultra because you only have a 2 gig card.
Bubba_Sparks
Member
Though I don't know if this is the right time or place to post this. After having played Fallout 4 for over 20 hrs. I can safely say The Witcher 3 is without a doubt my GOTY for 2015. I can't claim to have played everything released this year, but I've played most of the big games and for me personally this is my clear number one. The scale, combined with the consistent beauty of the world throughout, the story, the characters, the graphics! This game has it all and although it has its' fair number of faults, I think all of the above work together to overcome that! I think this is significant for me, because if you look at my initial impressions of this game they were not positive! It really just pulls you in to its' fully realized world and never lets you go.
Bethesda, Bioware, etc take notice CD Project RED just stole your lunch!
Bethesda, Bioware, etc take notice CD Project RED just stole your lunch!
Exentryk
Member
Preservation is only required on one sword for a global effect. Other Words may or may not be global.
wild wild rice
Member
Lazy question, but what's the general consensus? Wisdom teeth coming out and need something to sink time into after Fallout fell completely flat for me.
LegalEagleMike
Member
It is amazing, must buy if you loved the base game. Big difficulty spike but if you beat the game on Death March you should be fine. If not just turn down the difficulty or pay more attention then you did for the base game.
Meccanical
Member
If you want more Witcher 3 , you'll love it.
Warning, the bosses are hard as fuck.
wild wild rice
Member
Good to know, thanks.
I should probably play on easy. I have no recollection of how I built my character or how to be halfway decent in fights.
EmilioLargo
Member
Just booted it up yesterday for the first time. It's been a while since I played the base game, but I managed to recall the controls quickly and my fighting ability should be almost where it was when finishing the base game. Somehow I get completely crushed by the DLC's bosses. Even the final bosses in the base game weren't nearly as hard in my opinion.
In Hearts of Stone the
killed me like 5 times so I decided to lower the difficulty to 'Just the story'. Right now I try to fight
an this seems an impossible task even on the easiest difficulty.
It's really strange since I didn't encounter any problems on normal in the whole base game. I seem to do almost no damage and lose health pretty fast despite exceeding the recommended level for the current quest by two. Didn't really care for my gear tho. Any advice?
Problem is that I decided this games combat isn't for me (site note: got the platinum in bloodborne recently so I'm not per se against difficult games) so I'd rather just enjoy the story.
In Hearts of Stone the
toad prince
Olgierd
It's really strange since I didn't encounter any problems on normal in the whole base game. I seem to do almost no damage and lose health pretty fast despite exceeding the recommended level for the current quest by two. Didn't really care for my gear tho. Any advice?
Problem is that I decided this games combat isn't for me (site note: got the platinum in bloodborne recently so I'm not per se against difficult games) so I'd rather just enjoy the story.
EmilioLargo
Member
Just finished it (stayed on easy difficulty but enjoyed it) and I wholeheartedly agree.
Coreda
Member
This sounds useful, is it available from the Runesmith?
I put aside the game after the
Caretaker
Exentryk
Member
All of your weapons and armor.
IMO it's essential for all Witcher 3 owners, not because it's continuation of the story or anything (it is not), but because it's incredibly fun, and amazing value for money.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with this. The problem with that quest/puzzle was that it made no sense and was nothing but "run to the huge, obvious house and look for something red with your witcher senses". You don't even have to solve the puzzle and people that solved it will never feel rewarded for doing so. There should have been clues somewhere, maybe pictures in the form of celestical alignments in the sky, all kinds of symbols, maybe a horned skull, a rose, a number, a comb and of course a mirror. So you can solve the puzzle and it actually affects level design.
Finished the expansion today and loved it. The best way to describe tw3 is that it's not an open world game, it's an world game. While the first are using patterns to such an extent that it still feels like levels, tw3 just feels like you are visiting a different world. And that makes it so super immersive and enjoyable. Can't wait to get back to it. The parts of the game are good but the sum of its parts males it genious. For me it's one of the best game experiences I ever had and it's probably on par with ffvii. However, I was a kid when I played that and I was easier to impress.
I'm genuinely pleased with the bosses in this expansion being original and genuinely challenging. One issue though!
They don't really give you fun/decent uses for crossbow, signs or bombs. Dimeritium Bombs and Moon Dust are still some of the most useless bombs you can have, and DoT doesn't do much unless it's a non-igni burn.
I get that with a Swordsmanship build my non-sword options aren't going to be all that great, but my only moment of surprising efficiency was when I noticed that Yrden straight up paralyzes arachnomorphs.
I want witcher tools, even the more basic ones, work as occasional hard counters to enemy boss tactics. Even as a melee build, I want to do more than just swordfight with Quen on. I want more puzzles than just dodge/parry timing
They don't really give you fun/decent uses for crossbow, signs or bombs. Dimeritium Bombs and Moon Dust are still some of the most useless bombs you can have, and DoT doesn't do much unless it's a non-igni burn.
I get that with a Swordsmanship build my non-sword options aren't going to be all that great, but my only moment of surprising efficiency was when I noticed that Yrden straight up paralyzes arachnomorphs.
I want witcher tools, even the more basic ones, work as occasional hard counters to enemy boss tactics. Even as a melee build, I want to do more than just swordfight with Quen on. I want more puzzles than just dodge/parry timing
lordfuzzybutt
Member
They are not useless if used right. Dimeritium bomb is great to disable strong attack on golems, Moon Dust to prevent Werewolves from regenning, going invisible, Wraiths from teleporting for example.
Signs are really fun as well, Aard to knock down weak enemies, etc.
Crossbow can drop flying enemies, from Harpies to even a fucking Griffin mid flight charge.
Granted, crossbow doesn't have much use other than those but for signs there are lots more uses which I don't have enough time to list right now.
To note, I have a swordmanship build too and I use everything in fights.
I was talking about bosses there, the new bosses that have otherwise excellent mechanics, but the way to beating them isn't very interesting at all. The very first boss might have allowed for some creativity in my tactics, but that quickly dropped
lordfuzzybutt
Member
Then why did you list this, "when I noticed that Yrden straight up paralyzes arachnomorphs." , as an example?
By bosses, I consider those big monsters hunt to be bosses as well and those tactics work the same on them.
Sure, if you only count bosses as in actual story bosses then it's more limited.
Because I was so struggling to find any remarkable strategies for anything else introduced in the whole expansion, I had to mention something that illustrated what I want.
Also note, this is the expansion OT, not Witcher 3 OT
lordfuzzybutt
Member
Yeah I did not notice the OT. Anyway, I did say I agreed already. Your example made me confused a bit, that's it.