Nappuccino
Member
It won for direction and cinematography? That seems pretty on point.
Not when Hannibal is around!
But . . . I guess it's acceptable.
It won for direction and cinematography? That seems pretty on point.
I think Hamm is a shoe in next year. Just a hunch. Unless another True Detective comes out of left field I feel like the Emmy people are going to give him one just to acknowledge the overall work he did.
The Emmys really don't work that way. He hasn't won yet, so I see absolutely no reason to think Hamm will win next year.
One clear contender is gone. Which isn't to say he will win, but he may get lucky and no one will fill Cranston's void.
It was before Cranston won. It's not his reaction.I just wanted to say that i saw that gif of MM applauding and he looked fucking salty as fuck, damn.
Why can't they both be great?breaking bad is just a craze like pogs or pokemon, with most people saying they're fans to look 'cool'. most bb fans are unable to name the main characters names and think it's a show about fried chicken.
true detective is art compared to it.
Why can't they both be great?
Damn, that's rough.True, but if they haven't seen fit to reward him yet I fail to see why they will now. I mean he hasn't only lost to Cranston. He also lost to Kyle Chandler, Damian Lewis and Jeff Daniels.
No actor from Mad Men has ever won an Emmy.
I think the poster you're responding to might be trolling, I mean he says that most fans think bb is about fried chicken lol
It won for direction and cinematography? That seems pretty on point.
No, it's a first year category only.
The Emmys really don't work that way. He hasn't won yet, so I see absolutely no reason to think Hamm will win next year.
breaking bad is just a craze like pogs or pokemon, with most people saying they're fans to look 'cool'. most bb fans are unable to name the main characters names and think it's a show about fried chicken.
true detective is art compared to it.
breaking bad is just a craze like pogs or pokemon, with most people saying they're fans to look 'cool'. most bb fans are unable to name the main characters names and think it's a show about fried chicken.
true detective is art compared to it.
breaking bad is just a craze like pogs or pokemon, with most people saying they're fans to look 'cool'. most bb fans are unable to name the main characters names and think it's a show about fried chicken.
true detective is art compared to it.
No, it's a first year category only.
Very similar to Nolan fanboys here who make ridiculous statements about the alleged quality of his work.
By that logic, Kyle Chandler not winning for four years in a row would mean there's no reason he'd pick up an Emmy for his last season. And yet...
HBO kinda screwed True Detective by running it as a Drama. It would've had a much better chance of winning as a mini-series.
Cue a soundtrack of tiny violins for this playground fight between television networks.
FX Networks CEO John Landgraf says it's unfair that HBO plans to submit its critically acclaimed show "True Detective" in the Outstanding Drama Series category vs. the Outstanding Miniseries category at this year's Emmy Awards.
"My own personal point of view is that a miniseries is a story that ends, a series is a story that continues. To tell you the truth, I think it's actually unfair for HBO to put 'True Detective' in the drama series category because essentially you can get certain actors to do a closed-ended series, a la Billy Bob Thornton in 'Fargo' or Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson in 'True Detective,' who you can't get to sign on for a seven-year deal," Landgraf said at FX's upfront presentation to advertisers on Wednesday.
Sure but Chandler hadn't been getting nominated and losing every year. The Academy has had numerous chances to award Hamm and hasn't at every turn. Mad Men hasn't won anything at all for a few years now at the Emmys and no actor on the show has ever won.
It most likely isn't happening.
We got 5 years of BB, Cranston won the award plenty of times during that period.
Mcconaughey's performance on the other hand was a once in a generation thing, he won't be returning to that role or even TV again. Seems a shame he didn't get the award.
So in your mind, it makes more sense for the Emmys to award an actor they ignored for four consecutive years already than it is to award an actor that has been consistently on their radar?
The only way Hamm isn't getting an Emmy is if Mad Men's last season is Dexter levels of bad.
So in your mind, it makes more sense for the Emmys to award an actor they ignored for four consecutive years already than it is to award an actor that has been consistently on their radar?
The only way Hamm isn't getting an Emmy is if Mad Men's last season is Dexter levels of bad.
[citation needed]HOWEVER
Cranston will likely not pull off a performance like this because his other performances aside from walt have been tepid as a result...
Yeah, that is a shame for Matty. Though I just honestly think he was much better than Cranston.We got 5 years of BB, Cranston won the award plenty of times during that period.
Mcconaughey's performance on the other hand was a once in a generation thing, he won't be returning to that role or even TV again. Seems a shame he didn't get the award.
Yeah, that is a shame for Matty. Though I just honestly think he was much better than Cranston.
And I'm glad Woody got nominated also. McConaughey gets more attention, but Woody was pretty great in his own right.
this is great as a reaction gif but man that's one of my favorite "quiet" scenes in the whole thing. really playing on the overarching themes.. show nails the just little moments of great detective work in an office, that "fuck you" is rust reaffirming why he considers marty to be a "true" detective.
[citation needed]
Cranston hasn't been the lead in any of those, but he was good in Drive with his small part.
HOWEVER
Cranston will likely not pull off a performance like this because his other performances aside from walt have been tepid as a result while McConaughey's acting been consistently amazing throughout all the things he has been in recently and due to his career he is more likely to win more awards due to his acting than Cranston will.
This was essentially Cranston's swan song while characters like Rust will keep popping up for MM
LOLHOWEVER
Cranston will likely not pull off a performance like this because his other performances aside from walt have been tepid as a result while McConaughey's acting been consistently amazing throughout all the things he has been in recently and due to his career he is more likely to win more awards due to his acting than Cranston will.
This was essentially Cranston's swan song while characters like Rust will keep popping up for MM
Or if TD Season 2 actor performance like Woody Harrelson
Think his point was just that McConaughey will likely have more chances at awards for major film roles. Not so much because Cranston is not a good actor, but because MM for whatever reason is more commonly associated with major roles and has recently shined in said roles.:lol :lol :lol
Incredible how salty and myopic this post is considering this year Cranston won also a tony award for his (acclaimed by public and critics) performance as president Lyndon B. Johnson in "All the way" (role he will actually reprise in the TV adaptation).
Matt likely lost because he split the votes with his co-star, you guys need to get over it, there's no need to shit on other actors.