Yeah, disappointing.TD gets nothing.
Fuck you Emmys, dumbfucks.
So glad I didn't watch the Emmys now.
But this does open the door for future seasons in drama. Especially with BB gone and Mad Men ending next year.HBO fucked up by not putting it in Miniseries category.
Why would people find him an asshole? Just curious.
But this does open the door for future seasons in drama. Especially with BB gone and Mad Men ending next year.
So glad I didn't watch the Emmys now.
Wrong category. Breaking Bad was the best DRAMA of 2013. Great show tonight, and HBO was stupid for not submitting True Detective as a miniseries where it belonged.
Best Direction for Fukunaga. Robbed everywhere else.So TD really got no wins?
Best Direction for Fukunaga. Robbed everywhere else.
Really should have been in Miniseries like AHS.
Best Direction for Fukunaga. Robbed everywhere else.
To me, it was a truly great season of TV losing out to a fairly good one. I like Breaking Bad fine, but that last season was in no way great to me.Robbed how? Breaking Bad is an equally prestigious, acclaimed show. One great TV series beating out another isn't a robbery.
Also, none of these things mean anything anyway.
Oh wow, nice! The dude posting the winners in the topic didn't list any of these, my bad.It also received Emmys for Casting, Makeup for a single-camera series (non-prosthetic), Main Title Design, and Cinematography for a Single-Camera Series
It won for direction and cinematography? That seems pretty on point.
Breaking Bad was a 62 episode drama. True Detective was an 8 episode anthology miniseries.Pfft. True Detective actually had more episodes than Breaking Bad. :lol
edit: same amount of episodes actually, same difference.
You could see Matty M wasn't happy though. "Why the fuck am I here...?"
Breaking Bad was a 62 episode drama. True Detective was an 8 episode anthology miniseries.
Same amount of material being considered for these awards, though.Breaking Bad was a 62 episode drama. True Detective was an 8 episode anthology miniseries.
Unless you can change a show's category from year to year? Not sure how that works.
To me, it was a truly great season of TV losing out to a fairly good one. I like Breaking Bad fine, but that last season was in no way great to me.
Obviously I mean the seasons the voters were supposed to judge on.
For sure. Part of BB's win was a lifetime achievement award. Just human nature when voting on this sort of thing.I think anything that's going to be voted on by human beings will take things into consideration beyond the the actual boundaries. You can try to mitigate that as much as possible but it'll still be hard. Just like how juries work. In the end, we're talking about the final season of an acclaimed series. People are going to gravitate towards that. It is as much a vote for the final season itself, as it is a vote for the overall show and the accomplishment of finishing it. Return of the King won for the same reasons at the Oscars, even though that was the most bloated of the trilogy.
It also received Emmys for Casting, Makeup for a single-camera series (non-prosthetic), Main Title Design, and Cinematography for a Single-Camera Series
I said this in the other thread, but HBO (or the creator) made some baffling nomination choices. At the end of the day, the Emmy's are very strategic in what they put forth in nominations. HBO (or the creator) took a gamble taking Breaking Bad's final season head on. And even taking that risk, they didn't make the best nominations.
Emmy's are based on single episode nominations for a lot of these things. And BB had much stronger nominations in this regard. I mean hell, I thought Woody's episode nomination was better than MM's nomination (which was the finale, which wasn't even his best performance in the series).
That said, you are right there is always human subjectivity, as well as outside factors (such as voters voting on popularity or not having even seen the other nominees, but going with what they think is the most well known).
I said this in the other thread, but HBO (or the creator) made some baffling nomination choices. At the end of the day, the Networks are very strategic in what they put forth in nominations. HBO (or the creator) took a gamble taking Breaking Bad's final season head on. And even taking that risk, they didn't make the best nomination choices.
Emmy's are based on single episode nominations for a lot of these things. And BB had much stronger nominations in this regard. I mean hell, I thought Woody's episode nomination was better than MM's nomination (the finale, which wasn't even his best performance in the series).
I think putting True Detective in the Drama category over the Miniseries one was a risk but also a respectable move. HBO is showing that they feel it is a show which stands up with the competition, and win or lose, it will always have been a contender with those shows. In the end saying that you lost to the final season of Breaking Bad isn't really anything to be ashamed of.
I don't think their single episode nominations were bad though. They nominated episode 5 for writing, and that's definitely the strongest narrative episode. Universally praised for how it handled the passing of the years, and the changes between the characters. They nominated episode 4 for direction and cinematography, and it won in both. That's also definitely the strongest episode in terms of technical direction. The single-shot scene was something people wouldn't stop talking about.
I really fail to see what was baffling about their nomination decisions!
You thought MM's best acting was in the finale? Fair enough point about the other nominations (I guess I was generalizing, when it was really on that one I found baffling).
Acting and Best Series nominations are not per episode. Everything else is.
For most individual achievement categories, only one episode is required to be submitted; if an episode is a two-parter, both parts may be included on the submitted DVD.
For acting categories, the individual who is nominated selects an episode from the latest season that they feel displays their best performance.
I can assure you that when people are voting for Best Lead Actor in a major series everyone is talking about, most if not all of them have seen the entire series and would be basing it on the overall performance (or whatever other biases they might have). In the case of many of the other awards, the reason attaching an episode is important is because many shows have different directors and staff on the various departments from episode to episode. This doesn't apply to True Detective in particular, but it does have an impact because of how the industry views work on a series.
I don't think McConaughey lost because HBO might have submitted the finale along with the nomination submission. That is just a technicality. I think that McConaughey lost because he already won an Oscar earlier this year, and more voters decided to pay tribute to Cranston's work on Breaking Bad as a whole. It's understandable.
Do shows continue to get nominated after the first season for Main Title Design?
No, it's a first year category only.
Heh, I suppose they wouldn't make an exception considering they'll have to completely overhaul the main titles for its next season, would they?