Are those two different accounts or did they change from Killzone.com to Killzone?
I don't know how Twitter works.
I guess you are right fellow GAFfer, here's the "Official" one if I'm not mistaken!
Are those two different accounts or did they change from Killzone.com to Killzone?
I don't know how Twitter works.
I don't get it. Even if two months was "enough to visit Los Santos", it doesn't make Chicago worth visiting.
Pretty smart.
its funny because this game will be terrible compared to GTA5
Terrible conpared to GTA? Must be really bad then.
So it's an 8.5-9.5 game with few technical problems, but awesome gameplay, story, characters and soundtrack, all wrapped in amazing open world? I'll take five, please.well it is an ubisoft game
So it's an 8.5 game with few technical problems, but awesome gameplay, story, characters and soundtrack, all wrapped in amazing open world? I'll take five, please.
This too:
So it's an 8.5-9.5 game with few technical problems, but awesome gameplay, story, characters and soundtrack, all wrapped in amazing open world? I'll take five, please.
Riot is a classy companyThat's solid.
That's pretty good.
That's hilarious.
That's shit. Looks cheap and comes across as dumb and mean. Tone is important.
Amazing open world and awesome story and character + ubisoft is a suspension of the natural orderSo it's an 8.5-9.5 game with few technical problems, but awesome gameplay, story, characters and soundtrack, all wrapped in amazing open world? I'll take five, please.
Watch Dogs looks pretty bad to me, but still.
It's a general consensus of critics and most of the gamers. I know Gaf hates AC, but people really love the series, you know.this post makes me sad
It 'looks to be pretty bad', then.lol, it looks pretty bad? Or something you wouldn't be interested in? There's a difference and I wish people would learn that.
lol, it looks pretty bad? Or something you wouldn't be interested in? There's a difference and I wish people would learn that.
Aggressive marketing is best marketing.
But I expect the game to be another bland and soulless mass production like Ubi's other games.
it looks like a bad game. it has nice graphics, but as a game it does not look like a good game. it looks like it is boring and isn't very much fun.
it looks like a bad game. it has nice graphics, but as a game it does not look like a good game. it looks like it is boring and isn't very much fun.
it looks like a bad game to me. it has nice graphics, but as a game it does not look like a game I would enjoy playing. it looks boring to me and I don't think it looks like very much fun.
These are opinions. I think it looks pretty fun. Your post would make more sense like this:
But that would be too sensible for a videogame forum.
It's incredibly easy to determine when a statement is subjective, and when it is objective, based on the context.These are opinions. I think it looks pretty fun. Your post would make more sense like this:
But that would be too sensible for a videogame forum.
It's incredibly easy to determine when a statement is subjective, and when it is objective, based on the context.
There is no need to add the things you just did, or IMO, or anything else.