Reineldinho
Member
I really wanted to like this, but what I'm reading is just bad, even worse boring
Edit: Vandal gave it 6.5
Edit: Vandal gave it 6.5
review in spanish
Oops I'm dumbThis is not a Valkyria Chronicles sequel (besides that one already had 2).
Considering most critics only/mostly use 4-10 on a scale of 1-10, 5/10 is pretty bad. A game has to be utterly broken and barely functional to get anything below a 4, usually, like the kind of Steam/PC games Jim Sterling likes to shit on/make Youtube videos about ripping them apart.5/10 is generous for this game tbh. I don't know why it exists.
Heh, Shining's never too whored out for some producers at SEGA of Japan. They'll never own up to fucking over Camelot when they finished Shining Force III in desperate conditions, and they'll gladly make guaranteed otaku money with Shining spin-offs that might as well be different IPs in all but name. Meanwhile the Yakuza team continues to make good decisions for their franchise, or at least not bad ones.Some are going to disagree because it's not a "Chronicles" game and blame the setbacks of this game on those who don't agree. But I still haven't heard any real compelling reason why this tried to use the Valkyria name to begin with. Was Shining just too whored out?
ugh why did I impulse preorder this on PSN last minute before midnight? >_<
You joke but even though I reviewed it and it absolutely isn't worth buying, I'm buying it on Xbox because it existing is hilarious and some people get super salty about t being on Xbox one.Xbox owner: "Yay! At last we get a Valkyria game!!"
Sega "Yes! You get the shitty one!"
Xbox owner: "..."
You joke but even though I reviewed it and it absolutely isn't worth buying, I'm buying it on Xbox because it existing is hilarious and some people get super salty about t being on Xbox one.
I'm truly gutted, the first Valkyria game on Xbox and it's a poor one. Still holding out for a chronicles release but it looks even more unlikely now.
Wasn't this game out a while ago already?
Why should it be any better now?
It's made worse by the fact that Valkyria Chronicles was originally destined for Xbox 360 but never made it out on that format after its platform switch.
Why Sega greenlit this as the first game on Xbox and not VC Remastered boggles the mind.
Japan =/= Xbox is why
Japan != entire addressable console market.
The fact that Valkyria Revolution exists on Xbox One at all is evidence of this. Hence, why start with this flawed game and not Valkyria Chronicles Remastered.
Because the latter would probably stand more of a chance of recouping any costs involved in porting the game.
No literally, japan developers, and japanese games and xbox don't go together at all.
I'm not referring to Japanese users. I'm saying, japan developers, and japanese games and xbox don't go together at all. western Xbox gamers don't care about Japanese games period. And most times have to defend their existence on the platform. I don't even know why they bothered with this game honestly, as i can tell you it will bomb on every platform, but especially Xbox One.
It was PS4 / PSVita only in Japan. I'm surprised that they decided to put some extra cash porting it to the Xbox One.
I think the Xbox initiative came from Deep Silver, aka Sega Europes distribution partner.your response only really makes sense if I was to ask why Sega didn't bother with *any* Valkyria game on Xbox One. Which was not the case. They've literally just produced an Xbox One version of the game, and I'm wondering why they went for this anyway.
No this is absolutely not a sequel in any wayOops I'm dumb
Edit: nevermind, still count as sequel
I think the Xbox initiative came from Deep Silver, aka Sega Europes distribution partner
But it has nothing to do with asking why Sega went for this instead of Valkyria Chronicles Remastered. You just admitted yourself that this game isn't going to shift many copies, particularly so on Xbox One.
your response only really makes sense if I was to ask why Sega didn't bother with *any* Valkyria game on Xbox One. Which was not the case. They've literally just produced an Xbox One version of the game, and I'm wondering why they went for this anyway.
Whether active Xbox One aren't interested in these sorts of games is another matter entirely. But I'd be hesitant to put them all in a "Japanese games" box. I mean, would you put Ubisoft games in a "French games" box and say Xbox One owners aren't interested in French games if something like Rayman Legends and Child of Light flopped on One?
I didn't say I understood the reasoningI guess, though Xbox One isn't doing so well in most European markets. It just seems weird to me really. I'm happy that the game got ported to another platform regardless, though it is odd that Sega didn't even consider a Nintendo Switch version either.
Cause they werent going to bother porting Valkyria Chronicles remastered again in a delayed launch just for Xbox One, and instead just went for the game they were currently working on.
In Japan, they are only making the game for Japan, so PS4. They would have had to have an xbox one version planned from the start, and there was no point to that for that region.
As said, Deep silver did the port to XB1, Japan didn't really have anything to do with
That wasn't fact, but a suggestion as to what might have happened. And it would have been Media.Vision who programmed the port.
The difference is, you can't really tell most of these AAA european or candian games from anything made in America, for various reasons.
Japanese games are different and cant hide their origins so easily.
I mean, unless we're talking about DBZ/Naruto games and dark souls, or FF15..i'd hesitate to see the point.
that may be so, but deep silver likely commissioned it. You asked in the first place why this game and why not remastered. Well its likely Deep silver is the reason this game is on Xbox one at all
It's a spin-off at best.