What in the actual fuck.
If you played DMC and DMC2, you'd know I'm right.
What in the actual fuck.
I didn't see anything about it being mentioned here, but someone elsewhere pointed out that there are lighting differences between the Japanese trailer of the special edition and the existing version of the game.
If you played DMC and DMC2, you'd know I'm right.
The first set doesn't seem to capture the same frame. If you watch the trailer, it has a weird filter that occurs that sort of muddies the textures, but the picture taken for "NEXT GEN" is after that.
And I can't tell if the second set is the same or not, since Nero's arm is causing a lot of different shadows during that part.
The third set, I can't even tell a difference at all.
Some of the shadows might be darker in the PC version for all three? I'm just not sure. They're also likely not finished with whatever tweaks they have in porting it.
There are a lot of moves to play around with. And yellow orbs should never be a concern at a DMC game.
And the checkpoint system...it's not handholding like modern games and is actually pretty generous given that missions are not long in general. I'm not saying "get good" but that this is one of the games where you are rewarded for learning and being good at the game.
I didn't see anything about it being mentioned here, but someone elsewhere pointed out that there are lighting differences between the Japanese trailer of the special edition and the existing version of the game.
If you played DMC and DMC2, you'd know I'm right.
Resident Evil 5 solidified it as my favorite graphics engine until DICE's Frostbite 2 came to be (too bad I'm not going to buy EA games in the foreseeable future). Seriously, I literally analyzed both the 360 and PS3 versions on websites and comparing the demos to analyze the graphics to determine which version to get for perhaps weeks. Do I get it on PS3 just because of it starting on PS or on 360 to ensure I see the game with the the best textures and frame-rate. It fell apart when an online friend pointed out that it'll look best on PC.Capcom was really onto something with the MT Framework. It really makes me wonder what's in store for Panta Rhei.
DMC1 is still godlike. Combat is simplistic but you need to make use of almost every single move and when you use DT. Every enemy encounter requires you to be calculating. This game is arguably the only game in the series that feels like Dante is trapped in a world filled of demons and you must fight your way out like the legendary demon hunter. You gotta be smart of knowing when to use melee and range weapons, and which type to use. The mix between horror and action still hasn't been replicated to this day. And every single battle against Vergil is breathtaking, especially the last encounter. This game is dated in the sense that it came out in 2001, the design approaches behind it are still impressive.
I hope they use Panta Rhei for DMC5. Those short footage of Deep Down that Capcom showed is still the best next gen graphics I have ever seen.
I really don't want Capcom to stick with UE4 for all of this gen.
What's wrong with using third-party engines?
Maybe but excluding Battlefield 3, there really haven't been a game that wowed me, graphically, as much as this did since: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpIWhAAiNRc (especially that punch that I proudly had as a MySpace avy). Who knows though.I hope they use Panta Rhei for DMC5. Those short footage of Deep Down that Capcom showed is still the best next gen graphics I have ever seen.
Let's also not use that line from the original game to generalize the entire series. I believe DMC3 is still the best written game in the series. I'll totally agree that the rest is all pretty crap though, even if there are a lot of moments I like in 4 the actual plot wasn't especially interesting or good.
OK so by your logic, the original concept of the design is what we should go buy. Therefore, if the end product was changed it's irrelevant because we have to judge the game based on it's original development. Basically, ignore that DmC was supposed to be a retelling but say that "Capcom wanted a reboot" and that's how the game is.Your insistence on debating semantics does nothing to change the damage that DmC (not DMC) did to the franchise and fan morale. The effects of what Capcom wanted it to be can still be felt today, which is the whole reason why no one is certain as to what Devil May Cry's future is. They could just as well stick to their plan of continuing DmC and choose to ignore the original series after DMC4:SE.
DMC3 won't necessarily be winning any awards for either, yet even then both its voice acting and writing are far more competent (and coherent in the case of the latter) than anything found in DmC. And for as incomplete as the original DMC4 was, this scene alone was far better written and performed than anything in DmC, not to mention far more self-aware. Not even people who actually like NT make a point of defending what they came up with for DmC when compared to their previous work, which they actually had help with creating.
If it let's the action be fast paced as DMC should be, then I'm all for it.I hope they use Panta Rhei for DMC5. Those short footage of Deep Down that Capcom showed is still the best next gen graphics I have ever seen.
Innuendos are not even slightly classy. No matter how funny the pseudo Shakespeare one is, this one is completely moronicInnuendos are classy.
"I have a bigger dick." is not.
Innuendos are not even slightly classy. No matter how funny the pseudo Shakespeare one is, this one is completely moronic
OK so by your logic, the original concept of the design is what we should go buy. Therefore, if the end product was changed it's irrelevant because we have to judge the game based on it's original development. Basically, ignore that DmC was supposed to be a retelling but say that "Capcom wanted a reboot" and that's how the game is.
If you're that sad to holding a grudge over a video game, then why are you still talking about it nearly two years on? I admit, I'm not the biggest fan of the DMC series and I honestly started with DMC4, but when I played through all of the HD collection at once last year, I honestly felt the series wasn't that good to begin with. This goes for a lot of games. Everyone has a masturbation session over the games like Resident Evil, Final Fantasy, Sonic the Hedgehog, Devil May Cry etc as if they're almost perfect. Yet the current modern games (Sonic '06, Final Fantasy XIII, DmC, RE6) are actually very true to the series. A lot of the critcisms put towards games like DmC such as: bad voice acting, terrible dialogue, bad pacing, swearing, baby killing are all present in the previous games yet no-one acknowledges those or makes excuses for them being in those games. Which makes me think, if I can enjoy the latest games, why can't you?
I'm not offended by what DmC did the series considering the entire series is pretty pathetic when you think about it. But because of that, I can enjoy DmC without assuming the old games never had the same flaws. Maybe you should go back and play it because "Flock off feather face" and 'riding a motorcycle up a crumbling tower while fighting bloody gargoyles' is incredibly stupid.
OK so by your logic, the original concept of the design is what we should go buy. Therefore, if the end product was changed it's irrelevant because we have to judge the game based on it's original development. Basically, ignore that DmC was supposed to be a retelling but say that "Capcom wanted a reboot" and that's how the game is.
If you're that sad to holding a grudge over a video game, then why are you still talking about it nearly two years on? I admit, I'm not the biggest fan of the DMC series and I honestly started with DMC4, but when I played through all of the HD collection at once last year, I honestly felt the series wasn't that good to begin with. This goes for a lot of games. Everyone has a masturbation session over the games like Resident Evil, Final Fantasy, Sonic the Hedgehog, Devil May Cry etc as if they're almost perfect. Yet the current modern games (Sonic '06, Final Fantasy XIII, DmC, RE6) are actually very true to the series. A lot of the critcisms put towards games like DmC such as: bad voice acting, terrible dialogue, bad pacing, swearing, baby killing are all present in the previous games yet no-one acknowledges those or makes excuses for them being in those games. Which makes me think, if I can enjoy the latest games, why can't you?
I'm not offended by what DmC did the series considering the entire series is pretty pathetic when you think about it. But because of that, I can enjoy DmC without assuming the old games never had the same flaws. Maybe you should go back and play it because "Flock off feather face" and 'riding a motorcycle up a crumbling tower while fighting bloody gargoyles' is incredibly stupid.
I hope its not UE 4 ,i mean it could be nice,but, Capcom supposedly should have their own good engine, like MT Framework.I hope they use Panta Rhei for DMC5. Those short footage of Deep Down that Capcom showed is still the best next gen graphics I have ever seen.
To be fair, nothing much came out of Capcom in general for the first day of the Festa. Not even any BASARA-pertinent updates that were explicitly promised by Kobayashi. (Maybe they didn't want to be overshadowed by Square Enix?)
If we don't get anything tonight, then it would be a loss.
Yeah DMC3 had an interesting story but brothers feuding isn't much of an original idea. It seemed jumbled up at times with bad pacing. But again, I don't play DMC for story.
OK so by your logic, the original concept of the design is what we should go buy. Therefore, if the end product was changed it's irrelevant because we have to judge the game based on it's original development. Basically, ignore that DmC was supposed to be a retelling but say that "Capcom wanted a reboot" and that's how the game is.
If you're that sad to holding a grudge over a video game, then why are you still talking about it nearly two years on? I admit, I'm not the biggest fan of the DMC series and I honestly started with DMC4, but when I played through all of the HD collection at once last year, I honestly felt the series wasn't that good to begin with. This goes for a lot of games. Everyone has a masturbation session over the games like Resident Evil, Final Fantasy, Sonic the Hedgehog, Devil May Cry etc as if they're almost perfect. Yet the current modern games (Sonic '06, Final Fantasy XIII, DmC, RE6) are actually very true to the series. A lot of the critcisms put towards games like DmC such as: bad voice acting, terrible dialogue, bad pacing, swearing, baby killing are all present in the previous games yet no-one acknowledges those or makes excuses for them being in those games. Which makes me think, if I can enjoy the latest games, why can't you?
I'm not offended by what DmC did the series considering the entire series is pretty pathetic when you think about it. But because of that, I can enjoy DmC without assuming the old games never had the same flaws. Maybe you should go back and play it because "Flock off feather face" and 'riding a motorcycle up a crumbling tower while fighting bloody gargoyles' is incredibly stupid.
But when Dante is talking about penetration and thrusting his cock, that's still classy?
If it let's the action be fast paced as DMC should be, then I'm all for it.
If you played DMC and DMC2, you'd know I'm right.
I think people inferred that they did because they had "upcoming announcements that will turn heads in the west", but knowing Capcom that could be any time in the next couple of months..Didn't they specifically say they had announcements for Jump Festa?
Basically how I felt. I didn't even buy it when it was released because of the mediocre reviews and when I actually played it like 4 years ago.. couldn't get through it because it was pretty bland and awful.. Level design everything felt and looked the same bland brown..Not really. DMC2 is boring as fuck. It's one of the few games I stopped playing out of boredom.
If you played DMC and DMC2, you'd know I'm right.
No news from the Jump?
I think people inferred that they did because they had "upcoming announcements that will turn heads in the west", but knowing Capcom that could be any time in the next couple of months..
Basically how I felt. I didn't even buy it when it was released because of the mediocre reviews and when I actually played it like 4 years ago.. couldn't get through it because it was pretty bland and awful.. Level design everything felt and looked the same bland brown..
Jump Festa is over the course of the weekend so "It's not over yet!", but I'm surprised that other than Square, nobody else had anything planned for whole of today.
Not optimistic.
Innuendos are not even slightly classy. No matter how funny the pseudo Shakespeare one is, this one is completely moronic
I hope they continue to work with Reuben if DMC5 happens.
How popular is DMC in the U.S., Japan, and Europe respectifully anyway?
The One and Done;144210292 said:Devil May Cry made its living in the US primarily. DMC4 had awesome US sales. Wasn't a dud by any means.