Then you can blame Nintendo exclusively for laying them out to look as weak as possible.
It's come to a level that I can mention it, not just being my own hunches but it's becoming clear.
I've though of this the last time it was out and on another forum I said that those specs looked like they have been purposelly constructed to not reveal true power and nobody could calculate actual performance out of that, these new specs are even more ridicolous in that aspect.
I think we need to realize that nintendo totally expected leaks, and consumer stuff is not even the problem, it's more of industry espionage protection, they have to deal with that stuff way more professionally, I don't yet understand what benefit does it have, but they certainly WANT to confuse the industry analysts, and they're doing a geat job, just look at michael pachter, he has not idea what he's talking about.
If these so called specs are out that would somehow not enourage other sneakers to dig deeper into uncovering all kinds of details and possibly leaking that either intentionally or not.
One of the biggest reasons is obviously competitior defense, they want to be as unexpected as possible, they don't want Sony and Ms to know stuff, they want to have an impression for 2 years that WiiU is just a cheap PS360 level console and that would make probably MS to jump on that smokescreen/illusion and that obviously easily affects those business-only bosses that Microsoft has, which is microsoft's biggest weakness that can lead to it's demise. I've always thought that Microsoft's success was mostly lucky, preying on the avreage uninformed american customer is pretty easy, just hyping up the marketing does the trick, those strategies don't hold any innovation creativity nor anything that will be remembered for long or being written into hall of fame records.
These specs have been constructed with leaking in mind. So I don't believe the