chertipros
Member
Well of course that's it. Those darn lazy developersAhh, I see. It's another lazy port.
Well of course that's it. Those darn lazy developersAhh, I see. It's another lazy port.
Well of course that's it. Those darn lazy developers
Playing through Yakuza 2 in PCSX 2 right now, the animation is a little bit rough in some places but overall the game has aged quite well in terms of aesthetics.
Do you *honestly* think the Wii U has less power than the PS3?
Until proven otherwise, yes.
Show me the quality of Uncharted 3 and we will talk.
I think we should all wait until the game is done before making comparison.Well of course that's it. Those darn lazy developers
Oh challenge mode ..
Well it's challenge mode .
That part is ..unchanged in the hd remasters.
Yeah i remember that it was a tad bit unfair to the players at times.
Until proven otherwise, yes.
Show me the quality of Uncharted 3 and we will talk.
Until proven otherwise, yes.
Show me the quality of Uncharted 3 and we will talk.
Of course not, but that doesn't mean that they're equal in all areas. The ps3 just might be better suited to running ports like this. IIRC the ps2 had ports of dream cast games that didn't run as well either and we all know the ps2 was more powerful overall. We can't just attribute this to "lazy developers"Do you *honestly* think the Wii U has less power than the PS3?
I think we should all wait until the game is done before making comparison.
Do you *honestly* think the Wii U has less power than the PS3?
What would developers do differently if they knew an additional number or two? They still need to test real world performance either way. Not every CPU performs the same on the same clocks or whatever.There's no question it's less powerful in at least a couple of areas. RAM bandwidth for one.
But of course we don't know the exact specs of the Wii U because Nintendo won't release them, which may be a smart PR move but it in turn fucks over third party developers. So instead of blaming developers for being "lazy," how about you direct that blame towards Nintendo for creating this situation in the first place?
There's no question it's less powerful in at least a couple of areas. RAM bandwidth for one.
But of course we don't know the exact specs of the Wii U because Nintendo won't release them, which may be a smart PR move but it in turn fucks over third party developers. So instead of blaming developers for being "lazy," how about you direct that blame towards Nintendo for creating this situation in the first place?
Until proven otherwise, yes.
Show me the quality of Uncharted 3 and we will talk.
Graphics comparisons of HD remasters based on 800px × 450 images? Only on Kotaku!
Unless these are in HD form somewhere...
Maybe lesser texture filtering, not lesser textures, and yes you can miss it depending on how they re sized and compressed the images since they're clearly not native res. Otherwise it wouldn't be a HD release.Even so you can't miss the lesser textures. You can't mask that with blur especially when the images are clear enough to make that comparison.
So would you say the PS4 is less powerful than the PS3 due to the Cell being so beastly?
But Iwata is in charge now, surely things will change on that front right? right?
Kotaku's popup image viewer shows them in 1200x700 ...Graphics comparisons of HD remasters based on 800px × 450 images? Only on Kotaku!
Unless these are in HD form somewhere...
Thanks. Top shot is definitely upscaled from something less, and lacks AA. Bottom shot seems legit 1080p w/ 2xMSAA.Those are original images from 4gamer. They are both 1080P
Capcom said it was a "smash hit" it didn't bomb at all. It's going to outsell PS2 MH anyway.Maybe if Monster Hunter didn't already come out on Wii U and bomb really hard. The userbase isn't buying games, its fucking pathetic.
I play the game, I see the dead online. You can't fool me with nonsense PR talk. It hasn't even outsold the shitty pack in title at retail. Wii U owners, you suck.Capcom said it was a "smash hit" it didn't bomb at all. It's going to outsell PS2 MH anyway.
Calm down.I play the game, I see the dead online. You can't fool me with nonsense PR talk. It hasn't even outsold the shitty pack in title at retail. Wii U owners, you suck.
I play the game, I see the dead online. You can't fool me with nonsense PR talk. It hasn't even outsold the shitty pack in title at retail. Wii U owners, you suck.
I play the game, I see the dead online. You can't fool me with nonsense PR talk. It hasn't even outsold the shitty pack in title at retail. Wii U owners, you suck.
That's awfully low for being the only good game on the console.There's about 2500 people on right now. That's not dead at all.
Unless your metric for liveliness is COD on 360 numbers, in which case, what the hell is wrong with you.
That's awfully low for being the only good game on the console.
It's actually IR talk, not PR talk. At retail it's done around 60-70k US in Mar/Apr and is one of the better performing retail games digitally in the west (probably due to early supply constraints). Not amazing numbers, but it's likely already outsold every Yakuza game ever released in the west.I play the game, I see the dead online. You can't fool me with nonsense PR talk. It hasn't even outsold the shitty pack in title at retail. Wii U owners, you suck.
Huh?That's awfully low for being the only good game on the console.
They reiterated it in their annual report without mention to specific region. The game seems to be doing better digitally though as they also said disc sales were softer.To be fair Capcom said it was rather a "smash hit" for Japanese market.
Not the best comparison. When MH1 came out I had never heard of the series, now MH3U is one of my favorite games. Like comparing CoD1 players to Black Ops 2. No doubt the series is far more popular now than when MH1 came out.MH1 on the PS2 was lucky to get 1000 on a good day.
It's a niche game, dude; always has been and always will be.
Based on what? Yes, it's more popular in Japan, offline, no, it's not that much more popular in the West, with the Wii game selling the best yet, getting pirated on top, and still not having many more concurrent players.Not the best comparison. When MH1 came out I had never heard of the series, now MH3U is one of my favorite games. Like comparing CoD1 players to Black Ops 2. No doubt the series is far more popular now than when MH1 came out.
It should improve, sure, since it can't get any worse.But Iwata is in charge now, surely things will change on that front right? right?
What would developers do differently if they knew an additional number or two? They still need to test real world performance either way. Not every CPU performs the same on the same clocks or whatever.
So would you say the PS4 is less powerful than the PS3 due to the Cell being so beastly?
It wouldn't be a help regardless. People know to shoot for roughly PS360 level with potential for better shaders, textures, etc thanks to known specs. Anything else needs real world tests regardless of numbers.Obviously but it does mean they could get quicker results, as they'd have a much better idea of what they're working on from the very beginning, instead of stumbling around in the dark at first. It's not exactly a help, is it?
Ahh, I see. It's another lazy port.
Why Yakuza and not another SEGA series like Jet Set Radio? Too much sense?
Until proven otherwise, yes.
Show me the quality of Uncharted 3 and we will talk.
I play the game, I see the dead online. You can't fool me with nonsense PR talk. It hasn't even outsold the shitty pack in title at retail. Wii U owners, you suck.