fistfulofmetal
Banned
There's a very good possibility that both of these games end up being crap, you know.
i remember the last time someone said that, the reply was "no, they stole that from real life!"sykoex said:Well for one, GTAIV ripped the Cell phone and GPS ideas straight from Saints Row 1. It's not like the SR team is brain dead when it comes to creativity.
I knew someone was gonna say this. Saint's Row doesn't just follow the open-word/sandbox structure template set by GTA, it rips it off completely. The setting, sense of humour, characters and storyline are all trying to perfectly emulate GTA.fortified_concept said:So all FPSs should sell and be rated lower than Catacombs 3D (or whichever was the first FPS) because it was the first one? Gee, I hadn't thought of it that way before!
Btw it seems from that video that they have plenty of original ideas... unlike the new GTA.
so it's a complete ripoff... except when it's not... it makes sense i swear!!!Timber said:I knew someone was gonna say this. Saint's Row doesn't just follow the open-word/sandbox structure template set by GTA, it rips it off completely. The setting, sense of humour, characters and storyline are all trying to perfectly emulate GTA.
Sure it's fun pushing a button to throw yourself in front of traffic as a side-mission. But all these quirks don't justify how creatively bankrupt these games are.
Fuck Splinter-Cell and Resident Evil.Timber said:Holy shit, are you kidding? Saint's Row is fun, but it's bordering plagiarism. The original sold pretty well, and the sequel will have no trouble reaching a million. But I don't think a franchise that owes its entire existance to GTA and that's made by developers that clearly don't have a single original idea in their heads deserves to be one of the best selling series ever.
I know you like Saint's Row. I do, too. But is saying that it's a GTA ripoff such a contentious statement? Really? I admit I shouldn't have written completely. 'Largely' would have been more appropriate. But it's arguing semantics over something that's clear as day.The Faceless Master said:so it's a complete ripoff... except when it's not... it makes sense i swear!!!
fortified_concept said:So all FPSs should sell and be rated lower than Catacombs 3D (or whichever was the first FPS) because it was the first one? Gee, I hadn't thought of it that way before!
Btw it seems from that video that they have plenty of original ideas... unlike the new GTA.
Zoso said:Looking suspiciously similar to GTA4, graphically...
I can't stop disagreeing with people in this threadchubigans said:Yeah, Bowling, Darts and Pool is amusing
Bad games borrow. Great games steal.Timber said:Holy shit, are you kidding? Saint's Row is fun, but it's bordering plagiarism. The original sold pretty well, and the sequel will have no trouble reaching a million. But I don't think a franchise that owes its entire existance to GTA and that's made by developers that clearly don't have a single original idea in their heads deserves to be one of the best selling series ever.
did you watch the trailer?Timber said:I know you like Saint's Row. I do, too. But is saying that it's a GTA ripoff such a contentious statement? Really? I admit I shouldn't have written completely. 'Largely' would have been more appropriate. But it's arguing semantics over something that's clear as day.
People asked me if I even saw the trailer. I did and I saw a game being DIRECTLY compared to GTAIV. Whoops. Seems like Volition knows what's up, now it's you guys' turn.
Struct09 said::lol @ the video
Have to hand it to them, that's some smart marketing
fistfulofmetal said:There's a very good possibility that both of these games end up being crap, you know.
LCfiner said::lol at that video. Honestly, before I even saw that, my interest was piqued by that first screenshot in the OP. Katanas are back, baby!
If they tweak the characters and story stuff to be a bit less 'gangstah' than the first, consider me sold. Heck, even if they don't, i could overlook it if the gameplay really delivers.
Blackace said:why should they do that?
Odrion said:They were pretty smart to do the comparison.
And did you guys see this yet?
http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/882586/saints-row-2/videos/saintsrow_heavyweapons_042508.html
:lol
Blackace said:why should they do that? That was half the fun of SR. Picking up your posse and bangin on fools..
that is why GTA:SA fell a bit short because they didn't stick with the overall theme of gangsta for the whole game..
keyrat said:cause 'gangstas' are lame, especially the way they were portrayed in SR. that's definitely something GTA does well; even in SA despite the lame 'gangsta' theme that could've made it bad, the main character is always a bad ass.
Ranger X said:Is this coming for PS3 too?
I'm definetely interested now.
JBuccCP said:Saints Rows' story was so bad they should just skip it for II. The entire game should just be a bunch of random shit happening. One thing I thought GTA IV should have done is just have zoo animals fall randomly out of the sky. The entire Saints Row II should just be stuff like that. Like one day you turn your game on and all the peds are replaced with Sesame Street characters trying to kill you.