like, people watching Harakiri and I was stuck with Emmerich destroying a under-stair cupboard that pretended to be the White House with Jamie Foxxxx Obama'ing for the money, sigh
Sounds like a personal problem!
I would be the first person to admit that a fair bit of
Assassination flew over my head. Steeped heavily in the final years of the Tokugawa Shogunate, the film assumes a more than passing familiarity with the historical context than the opening narration can provide on the part of the viewer. Further muddying the waters is the fact that there are over a half-dozen perspectives that we follow throughout the film, and with the film's propensity for flashbacks to help flesh events out often transitioning back to the present without much warning, you are dealing with what we in the business might refer to as a slippery son of a bitch. Thankfully, the film isn't so impenetrable to the unversed as it is largely focused on one character, or, more specifically, the diverging perspectives of several different people in an attempt to untangle the mess of contradictions that we find him to be. The subject at hand is Hachiro Kiyokawa, a cunning ronin of modest beginnings who has put forth a plan to shift the balance of power in the country's not-so-silent civil war. His already complex personality is continually filtered through those that knew him, know him, or thought they knew him, leading to a wildly varied recounting of who the man is: he can be a convincing charismatic leader or an eccentric schemer bordering on insane, a remorseful would-be pacifist or ruthless killer, and so on. Indeed, the main thrust of the plot is determining where his sympathies ultimately lie in the country's turbulence, as men on both sides of the conflict find their reasons for distrusting the true aim of his plans. The lead performance from Tetsuro Tamba covers all of these conflicting aspects of Kiyokawa's personality in a convincing and engaging way, but the screenwriters make a tricky play to keep Kiyokawa fairly enigmatic. It's the kind of story that isn't so much about explain who this person is so much as it's concerned about explaining why the people that recount their time with him would think the way they do, like a kind of dying feudal Japanese take on
Citizen Kane. An already tough film to get into gets even more complex as a result, but it winds up working well as a result of director Masahiro Shinoda (who somehow managed to get this out the same year as
Pale Flower) tackling the material with a fantastic visual presentation, ensuring that the editing is precise, even as the flashbacks can disorientate, and staging sequences with a very strong sense of framing, particularly for the shots that rely on long pans. The unrest of the life and times the film depicts seeps into the way it's told, which feels very complementary and would be hard to imagine it handled differently. I suspect I would like this film even more if I hit the books and researched more into the history, so it's hard for me to hold it against the film too much to not have been prepared for its density (amazingly, at just over 100 minutes long, it covers a lot of territory as it is). That does give it an stronger replay value that other films may not enjoy as they engage with the real life history in a less formal and frankly inessential manner. A tough film to recommend for entirely valid reasons, but one I can't imagine I'll regret anytime soon, especially with such a high caliber of filmmaking on display.