• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[Salon] Diversity is for white people: The big lie behind a well-intended word

Status
Not open for further replies.

nynt9

Member
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/26/div...ople_the_big_lie_behind_a_well_intended_word/

Our country is convulsing over the issues of diversity and race. Police departments from Baltimore to Minneapolis are talking about diversity hiring as the antidote to anti-black police brutality. Last month’s flash point was Hollywood darling Matt Damon whitesplaining diversity, igniting a Twitterstorm of outrage. Earlier this year was the failed Race Together stunt by the CEO of Starbucks, which tried to enlist customers in over-the-counter exchanges about America’s most vexing dilemma.

As an academic, I have spent more than a decade investigating this enigmatic term: What do we mean by “diversity” and what do we accomplish when we make it our goal? Using first-hand ethnographic observation and historical documents, my research has taken me from the U.S. Supreme Court during debates about affirmative action to a gentrifying Chicago neighborhood to the halls of a Fortune 500 global corporation.

Here’s what I’ve learned: diversity is how we talk about race when we can’t talk about race. It has become a stand-in when open discussion of race is too controversial or — let’s be frank — when white people find the topic of race uncomfortable. Diversity seems polite, positive, hopeful. Who is willing to say they don’t value diversity? One national survey found that more than 90 percent of respondents said they valued diversity in their communities and friendships.

The term diversity has become so watered down that it can be anything from code for black people to a profit imperative. Consider the cringe-worthy experience I had sitting in on a corporate diversity training, where initiates learned that diversity could mean our preferences for working at daytime or at night, or our favorite animal. As a Deloitte study showed, many Millennials take it to simply mean one’s unique culture and perspective. (Apparently they are listening to their diversity trainers).

Ultimately, I see diversity as a big lie. We need fewer cheerful logos and more effective action. Like an honest reckoning with racist housing policies that have robbed people of color of wealth. Like affirmative action policies at work and in universities, which have effectively moved people of color up the economic ladder. Like support for collective union bargaining. Like the decriminalization of recreational drug use and addiction.

diversify me if old
 

Slayven

Member
She isn't wrong.


Instead, the diversity movement gives us doctored photos in college brochures. It gives us investment banks that keep hiring rich, white, Ivy League grads. And it gives us Damon’s denial of racism. Diversity is not the wake-up call that white America needs. It’s the snooze button.
Fire
 

nynt9

Member
I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more traction here. I find that Salon are often clickbaity, but this article has good points.
 
I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more traction here. I find that Salon are often clickbaity, but this article has good points.

I think Salon is more sensationalist than clickbaity... I appreciate that their headlines tell the story rather than try to obfuscate it. A lot of quality writing from Salon, but it definitely aspires to the sensationalized side.

Here’s what I’ve learned: diversity is how we talk about race when we can’t talk about race. It has become a stand-in when open discussion of race is too controversial or — let’s be frank — when white people find the topic of race uncomfortable. Diversity seems polite, positive, hopeful. Who is willing to say they don’t value diversity? One national survey found that more than 90 percent of respondents said they valued diversity in their communities and friendships.

I think this is a good point, but it's not just about "discomfort" as the article suggests... It's also, as the author alludes to in the quoted section, about the law. The Supreme Court determined that it's illegal to admit students on the sole basis of race in order to fill a quota. What the Courts allow, though, is for soft aspirations to diversity... But the actual actions of the Enrollment office still end up being the same, it's just that it's not motivated by a race quota, it's motivated by a soft enrollment goal to "increase diversity," which glides comfortably within the law.
 

nynt9

Member
I think Salon is more sensationalist than clickbaity... I appreciate that their headlines tell the story rather than try to obfuscate it. A lot of quality writing from Salon, but it definitely aspires to the sensationalized side.

Yeah, that's what I meant. Sorry.
 
I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more traction here. I find that Salon are often clickbaity, but this article has good points.

This year's blackface thread and the fear it's no doubt inspiring probably have several posters wary of a topic like this.

I agree; it's interesting to see how diversity is defined to suit specific purposes at a given time.
 
"Diversity training". Where they teach you that the person next to you is a human being just like your stupid ass. This country man.
 

studyguy

Member
Find most of the discussion online heavily divorced from my day to day experience. Mentioned it before but generally deal with mostly rural Central Valley and Northern California farmers along with some SoCal CSA growers and racial talk varies radically. From dudes straight up shitting on "Oriental" growers fucking up the certain commodity prices to other dudes laughing about those Mexican shitting in their own fields (during the Cilantro price boom recently) and asking me why Mexico has such a problem with immigration and why we don't handle it ourselves. (Which is incredibly ironic since they'll gripe up and down over the farm labor shortage we currently have now.)

Shit's fucked up in a boots on the ground sort of way dealing with older dudes who are way more conservative. Generally I try to engage in lighter discussion but their 9-5 isn't concerned looking at diversity in a meaningful, constructive manner. It's not every grower of course, the CSA dudes are like the polar opposite with some of them asking my warehouse dudes for pallets to help build their living structures out somewhere in Colorado and talking up radical political reforms. It's real fucking weird shit.

Honestly when I come online it's cool that the discourse is going on but I figure it'll just take a few generations dying off before we truly get the ball rolling in any meaningful way when it comes to talking about your average discussion on race. Most of these dudes like I said are old as shit and simply don't care to listen, younger dudes seem to at least have exposure. Just my two cents.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
The diversity for the sake of showing diversity on a magazine cover is fucked up. There is a flip side in that some people may go to a school if it appeals to them that another person that looks like them goes there. Hopefully this would grow into a bigger community. Though for most schools in a business it comes down to a depressing check list check.

The term diversity has become so watered down that it can be anything from code for black people to a profit imperative. Consider the cringe-worthy experience I had sitting in on a corporate diversity training, where initiates learned that diversity could mean our preferences for working at daytime or at night, or our favorite animal. As a Deloitte study showed, many Millennials take it to simply mean one’s unique culture and perspective. (Apparently they are listening to their diversity trainers).

What
 

Walpurgis

Banned
I noticed a lot of this token diversity during the Canadian election. Whenever party leadera spoke, they had this "diverse" entourage that just stood there behind them. These people literally did nothing but stand behind the candidate while they spoke about their policies. It was so blatant and weird.
 

kirblar

Member
Even in the hands of the well-intended, diversity leaves us without a language for making sense of ongoing racism or deliberating effective policy responses. A rigorous study by sociologists at University of California-Berkeley, Harvard University and University of Minnesota shows that corporate diversity trainings are especially counterproductive, despite being the most popular program in the multibillion-dollar diversity management industry. These trainings do not move white women or most people of color into management, and they actually decrease black women’s odds of becoming managers by 7%, perhaps because they can breed resentment. Likewise, in the neighborhood I studied, politicians promoted small-scale homeownership housing programs for the middle class in the name of diversity — but these race-blind programs were altogether insufficient for addressing the displacement of the low-income, majority black and Latino renters getting railroaded by condominium conversions.
Yup. People love to implement programs so that they can point to them and not have to actually touch or actually address the underlying real issues. (I'd argue Affirmative Action has also been used in this way.)
 

Clefargle

Member
I own a startup. We are very homogenous. We are also currently small. When we can hire someone, I want to make sure that this person will bring not only value, but diversity to the workplace. I understand that people have an inherent tendency to hire people that remind them of themselves and are easily influenced by biases. I want to take measures to guard against that, but how do I describe that without using the language of "diversity"? Am I part of the problem just for using that term? I would appreciate some insight from GAF, as I don't rightly know how to approach this.
 

Asbel

Member
The word diversity implies racial and gender diversity but not everyone see it that way so it probably shouldn't anymore.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
I noticed a lot of this token diversity during the Canadian election. Whenever party leadera spoke, they had this "diverse" entourage that just stood there behind them. These people literally did nothing but stand behind the candidate while they spoke about their policies. It was so blatant and weird.
They do it in the US all the time lol.
 

G.ZZZ

Member
No shit? It's just dog whistles, just look at all the fucking outrage on every menial shit that don't actually matter, meanwhile the actual policies that would help minorities, mostly economical ones, are fought to the death because socialism = evil in america.

The sooner people realize that they should speak not in terms of of skin color and more on term of social policies to actually make a difference, the better. You can't change people's perception if you keep minorities a permanent underclass. Poors will always be more susceptible to crime and discrimination.
 

ampere

Member
The term diversity has become so watered down that it can be anything from code for black people to a profit imperative. Consider the cringe-worthy experience I had sitting in on a corporate diversity training, where initiates learned that diversity could mean our preferences for working at daytime or at night, or our favorite animal. As a Deloitte study showed, many Millennials take it to simply mean one’s unique culture and perspective. (Apparently they are listening to their diversity trainers).

That is really weird

Sounds like companies looking for a "loophole" to say they are diverse or something.

"Mark likes bunnies and Jessica likes pigs! We're so diverse!"
 
The issue they're describing isn't diversity itself, it's how diversity is applied.

Yup, there are plenty of actual diverse neighborhoods and workplaces and classrooms - they exist, it's not a pie in the sky.

But yeah, I think she's talking about the United Colors of Benetton type cringe-inducing "diversity."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom