• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ars Techniica: Sony will wake a sleeping HDR beast via firmware. Rigby mentioned!

LordOfChaos

Member
1.4 -> 2.0 -> 2.0a

When both the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One launched in 2013, the systems' HDMI controllers were rated as HDMI 1.4. That was the primary HDMI standard at the time, and it determined how much data could be sent over HDMI cables at a given moment, which governs technical details like maximum frame rates at certain pixel resolutions.

Displaying a "full 4K" signal—also known as UHD resolution, measured at 3840x2160 pixels—is impossible via the HDMI 1.4 spec, at least at the desired 60 frames-per-second sweet spot. (4K via a 1.4 interface will work, but it's limited to 24 frames per second.) Any media-playing and computing device that wants to connect to a 4K screen via HDMI will need an HDMI controller rated at least 2.0 for those settings. The aforementioned NeoGAF forum member, Jeff Rigby, alleged that the controller was capable of that spec, in spite of its release before 2.0 had been finalized.

High dynamic range displays require just as much data throughput for so much color and luminosity data. The two leading HDR specs, HDR-10 and Dolby Vision, require no less than an "HDMI 2.0a" spec, which supplants the higher-bandwidth requirements of 2.0 with "additional metadata" required to enable the transmission/reception of such HDR content. There is no HDMI "1.4a" to offer the same boosts to HDR-ready 1080p displays. To ride the HDR train, your device better be rated HDMI 2.0a, or you're getting kicked off.

Rigby guessed last year that the PlayStation 4's HDMI controller is HDMI 2.0 compatible—meaning, it had been developed with higher bandwidth than the HDMI 1.4 spec required, and it just needed an official update via firmware to unlock and unleash that potential. Now, House has confirmed that it's coming, because anything rated for HDR specifications is technically also ready for 4K resolution.

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/...rise-firmware-update-is-4k-around-the-corner/


It reads like a lot of guesswork, but it was funny seeing my Ars and Neogaf venn diagrams converge.

This HDR thing remains confusing and Sony really does need to come out and clarify what's going on with it.

This is just HDR though, they don't support UHD Blu Rays if that's what he also claimed, but the guesswork about the chipset was along a similar path.

Semi-props to him then if Ars isn't wrong.
 

Rellik

Member
He was mentioned (called out) by Penello, not in name but in tought. Jeff was already (in) famous.

Yeah, but Penello didn't mention him by name (Although we all knew on here who he was referring to)

It won't be long until he has his own podcast and t-shirt store.
 
Rigby's argument was that 4K was possible, due to the controller. Maybe it still is, however is the PS4 capable of 4K playback? Not for games, surely, but maybe for films. Again, Rigby was right, whether Sony will cough up the necessary licenses to allow PS4's to be UHD players is another question. That he said they would was a guess on his part.
 

Quixzlizx

Member
You can stream UHD HDR movies. Vudu and Netflix both offer some titles in that format.

UHD BDs need a physical BD drive upgrade, I'm guessing.
 

Rellik

Member
But rigby's threads were always about UHD resolutions right? Spelling wise, UHD doesn't look like HDR

The article thinks UHD BD is just a matter of Sony not paying the licensing fees.

I'm nowhere near knowledgable enough to know how true or BS that is. But it does slightly cover the UHD-Rigby thing.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Rigby's argument was that 4K was possible, due to the controller. Maybe it still is, however is the PS4 capable of 4K playback? Not for games, surely, but maybe for films. Again, Rigby was right, whether Sony will cough up the necessary licenses to allow PS4's to be UHD players is another question. That he said they would was a guess on his part.


His argument was that uhd blu ray disc playback was possible. Nobody (sensible) denied that hdr and even a 4k video signal were theoretically possible. But his primary claim was 100% incorrect.


Jeff also continually adjusted his claims and ignored evidence to the contrary and is not a "victim" as he is occasionally painted.

So far...
 

Slaythe

Member
For fuck sake.

Rigby threw a ton of shit at the wall, one ended up sticking, and now he's an oracle.

Ok then.

Being 90% wrong doesn't matter if you guessed 10% correctly I guess.
 

JaseC

gave away the keys to the kingdom.
wait a second. Jeff Rigby was right? Are you fucking serious? lolol

He mentioned off-hand once or twice that HDR support would be coming, but this was merely an element of his broader theory that the PS4 and X1 would retroactively receive UHD BD support as opposed to the crux itself. Many people, GAFers included, confused HDR with UHD BD, though.
 

Oppo

Member
But rigby's threads were always about UHD resolutions right? Spelling wise, UHD doesn't look like HDR

same requirements for both, it seems.

I never thought Rigby was way off base technically, it just didn't take into account political ramifications. Like, Sony pushing a streaming service.
 
His argument was that uhd blu ray disc playback was possible. Nobody (sensible) denied that hdr and even a 4k video signal were theoretically possible. But his primary claim was 100% incorrect.


Jeff also continually adjusted his claims and ignored evidence to the contrary and is not a "victim" as he is occasionally painted.

So far...
.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
same requirements for both, it seems.

I never thought Rigby was way off base technically, it just didn't take into account political ramifications. Like, Sony pushing a streaming service.


He was also off base technically. HDR is not UHD disc playback any more than My Little Pony is Citizen Kane.
 
His argument was that uhd blu ray disc playback was possible. Nobody (sensible) denied that hdr and even a 4k video signal were theoretically possible. But his primary claim was 100% incorrect.


Jeff also continually adjusted his claims and ignored evidence to the contrary and is not a "victim" as he is occasionally painted.

So far...

So much this.
 

Oppo

Member
He was also off base technically. HDR is not UHD disc playback any more than My Little Pony is Citizen Kane.

Of course – I was referring to the HDMI 2.0a requirement for both HDR and UHD. So if they can flash the firmware to support HDR, that seems to support the notion, or am I missing something?
 

Noobcraft

Member
Nobody even knows if the firmware update is enabling true 10 bit HDR yet, or whether 4k HDR enabled sets will recognize the signal.
 
Who is Rigby.

Tin_foil_hat_2.jpg
 

Piccoro

Member
Of course – I was referring to the HDMI 2.0a requirement for both HDR and UHD. So if they can flash the firmware to support HDR, that seems to support the notion, or am I missing something?

UHD requires HDMI 2.0, HDR requires 2.0a, which is even more demanding, and the OG PS4 will have it next week...
 

JohngPR

Member
But rigby's threads were always about UHD resolutions right? Spelling wise, UHD doesn't look like HDR

But you need a higher standard to do HDR than you do UHD...so it's not a crazy notion as it seemd before now that we know that every PS4 can do HDR.
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
Of course – I was referring to the HDMI 2.0a requirement for both HDR and UHD. So if they can flash the firmware to support HDR, that seems to support the notion, or am I missing something?
I'm not into the media aspect at all.

But wouldn't the Blu-Ray drive inside the PS4 not also need to be able to read UHD BR discs. The requirement for UHD BR playback isn't just HDMI 2.0a, right?
 

ViciousDS

Banned
He mentioned off-hand once or twice that HDR support would be coming, but this was merely an element of his broader theory that the PS4 and X1 would retroactively receive UHD BD support as opposed to the crux itself. Many people, GAFers included, confused HDR with UHD BD, though.

that entire thread thought HDR = UHD blu-ray


dear god
 

Oppo

Member
UHD requires HDMI 2.0, HDR requires 2.0a, which is even more demanding, and the OG PS4 will have it next week...

Yes, this is what I'm saying, Rigby was right about that aspect.

But wouldn't the Blu-Ray drive inside the PS4 not also need to be able to read UHD BR discs. The requirement for UHD BR playback isn't just HDMI 2.0a, right?

It's hard to find good answers but there isn't a huge difference in physical structure between the discs, if it can read a triple layer blu ray, then the rest is encoding I think. I'm not certain.

There are some LG drives that can be flashed to read UHDs, it's not out of the question.
 
Top Bottom