Support NeoGAF

VisceralBowl · Dec 18, 2014

Durante said:
GameGPU article

Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

Post your results.

Qassim · Dec 18, 2014

That's an amazing image.

Seems to run perfectly for me. Loads of processing power to spare as expected @ 1920x1080p on a 4770K, 2x GTX 780 SLI.

Which makes it a little disappointing that:

A) The game is capped at 60fps
B) DSR isn't yet supported for SLI + G-Sync configurations..

Nete · Dec 18, 2014

i5 2500k, 8GB RAM, GTX 760 2GB here. Maxed out at 1920x1080.

With old drivers, low 50's dropping up to 42 with hell unleashed on screen.
With beta drivers, high 50's dropping up to 47.

It runs smooth as hell.

TheLegendOfMart · Dec 18, 2014

Anyone with a 7950?

Vuze · Dec 18, 2014

Runs like a dream maxed out on my i5 4570/GTX 970 config (downsampling via DSR, not sure which exact resolution lol, just turned it up until I lost locked 60). Great work.

Ingueferroque · Dec 18, 2014

Such a good banner.

CharmingCharlie · Dec 18, 2014

Nete said:
i5 2500k, 8GB RAM, GTX 760 2GB here. Maxed out at 1920x1080.

With old drivers, low 50's dropping up to 42 with hell unleashed on screen.
With beta drivers, high 50's dropping up to 47.

It runs smooth as hell.

Pretty much my experience on a 3 year old i5 @ 3.5ghz coupled with a GTX 670 4gb. Seems to be running at 60fps about 80/90% of the time with some dips below 50. However unless you have a frame rate counter I can't see you noticing any huge drops in framerate.

Krusenstern · Dec 18, 2014

The game runs buttery smooth on my i7 975 & GTX 970 with the new beta drivers. No performance dips from what I can tell. Excellent port.

And the game looks incredible. Holy wow. Finally seing the real time intro cutscene was beautiful.

JayEH · Dec 18, 2014

That banner...I can't stop laughing.

kabel · Dec 18, 2014

Xeon 1230v3 8GB 270x

Will it run well? I have a 1440*900 monitor.

Mundharmonika · Dec 18, 2014

anyone got impressions with a GTX 660Ti at 1080p?

peronmls · Dec 18, 2014

Is there no AA option in this game??? Everything is up but I still see aliasing.

Durante · Dec 18, 2014

GameGPU article

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Metal_Gear_Solid_V_Ground_Zeroes_-test-mgs_1920.jpg

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Metal_Gear_Solid_V_Ground_Zeroes_-test-mgs_2560.jpg

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test_GPU-Action-Metal_Gear_Solid_V_Ground_Zeroes_-test-mgs_proz.jpg

Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

IcyBlueStrawberry · Dec 18, 2014

Durante said:
GameGPU article

Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

**If you've got an Nvidia GPU.

Blablurn · Dec 18, 2014

Would like to hear something from laptop gamers.

Miguel81 · Dec 18, 2014

AMD 8320, r290, 8GB RAM. 1920 x 1080 with shadows and SSAO lowered to high for a smoother experience.

Qassim · Dec 18, 2014

Would be interesting to see benchmarks on the 'high' settings - apparently those are the equivalent to the PS4 'settings'.

Corpekata · Dec 18, 2014

Game runs great but I feel like some of the DoF goes overboard. Like maxed out in the options menu the side view of Snake is kinda just blurry. Turning down screen filtering reduces it somewhat. So many settings are wrapped up in SF I wish there was a way to tweak various ones.

TheLegendOfMart · Dec 18, 2014

Ugh, only 30-40fps on 7950?

Kezen · Dec 18, 2014

TheLegendOfMart said:
Ugh, only 30fps on 7950?

At maximum settings, are you surprised ?

Randam · Dec 18, 2014

Durante said:
Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

jip, disappointed in the 290 performance.

Seanspeed · Dec 18, 2014

IcyBlueStrawberry said:
**If you've got an Nvidia GPU.

Yea AMD performance is dogshit.

RK9039 · Dec 18, 2014

Durante said:
GameGPU article

Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

Dat 680.

TheLegendOfMart · Dec 18, 2014

Kezen said:
At maximum settings, are you surprised ?

Yes, 7950 is almost 760 tier which is somehow faster than 280X in those benches.

Loris146 · Dec 18, 2014

GTX 670 still rocking

Captain Pants · Dec 18, 2014

Really hoping my 660M will hang in there.

Denton · Dec 18, 2014

repost

Alright, had to knock down lightning and SSAO down to mere "high". All the other stuff at extra high at 1080p gives me 60fps without any drops, on 2500k@4ghz, 280X, 8GB RAM.

Funnily enough, at 1080p I get 20-40fps in 15 years old game Outcast. But then this is a voxel based game that does not use GPU in any way

Blablurn · Dec 18, 2014

Captain Pants said:
Really hoping my 660M will hang in there.

pls post back

epmode · Dec 18, 2014

Looks like I can expect 60 FPS at 2560x1600. Good times.

Kezen · Dec 18, 2014

TheLegendOfMart said:
Yes, 7950 is almost 760 tier which is somehow faster than 280X in those benches.

Maybe AMD haven't got enough time to optimize their drivers for the game. A 7950 should be ahead of a 760.

Saty · Dec 18, 2014

Worth a note: GameGPU's benches aren't using the new Nvidia beta drivers.

throwawayname · Dec 18, 2014

Someone with a AMD 5850 xtreme or similar here and can tell me about the performance?

Coconut · Dec 18, 2014

Good thing that performance analysis was done with practicle CPU performance.

Captain Pants · Dec 18, 2014

Blablurn said:
pls post back

I'm at work for the next 5 hours, but I'll follow up eventually.

Durante · Dec 18, 2014

Coconut said:
Good thing that performance analysis was done with practicle CPU performance.

When you post GameGPU results, there's always at least one guy who doesn't understand benchmarking.

blastprocessor · Dec 18, 2014

Why is AMD performance so bad?

Denton · Dec 18, 2014

blastprocessor said:
Why is AMD performance so bad?

nVidia title, so AMD might not have had access to the game before release.
It still runs well enough, but yeah comparable gpu on AMD side is slower than nVidia. I expect driver update soon.

Still it sucks though, it would be nice if both companies had access to all games.

IronicTonic · Dec 18, 2014

GTX 670
4gb ram
3570k
non-beta driver

Drops from 60 rarely occur, maxed out at extra high for everything at 1080p. Only bugs include some weird DoF when aiming in first person sometimes and some erratic drops turning the camera.

GhostTrick · Dec 18, 2014

Durante said:
GameGPU article

Performance seems great, especially considering the significant improvements over the console version. Of course, it's a 60 FPS title on consoles, so it's not too surprising it runs well.

Edit: looking at the higher res GPU benchmarks, AMD performance seems lower than you'd expect. Perhaps a new driver release will improve on that.

AMD performances are really subpar on this game.. R9 290 performing nearly the same as GTX670 ? This really needs a driver update.

Horsemama1956 · Dec 18, 2014

Just sold my i5 setup and bought a cheapo build with parts from Kijiji until the new AMD cards come out, and I'll do a complete rebuild.

Lol specs:
i3 530 4Ghz
Sapphire 7870XT 3 1100/1600

Model Detail - High
Texture Detail - Extra High
Texture Filtering - Extra High
Shadows - High
Lighting - Extra High
Screen Filtering - High
SSAO - High
Effects - Extra High

And getting 60 fps(only played for a few mintues so far) at 1600x900 and 40-50% CPU usage, 60-70% GPU usage. Running the Omega Drivers.

Not many people should problems with this game unless they want high resolutions and maxed out. Can't really tell the difference with the settings I put on High from Extra High.

Dick Justice · Dec 18, 2014

Only issue so far is that helicopter landings cause my framerate to drop by around 10FPS. And the camera control can be somewhat jerky at times on a controller.

poodpick · Dec 18, 2014

IronicTonic said:
GTX 670
4gb ram
3570k
non-beta driver

Drops from 60 rarely occur, maxed out at extra high for everything at 1080p. Only bugs include some weird DoF when aiming in first person sometimes and some erratic drops turning the camera.

Yeah is the first person aiming supposed to be so ugly? The DoF doesn't look so hot.

4770k
770 2gb

All settings at max

Sinatar · Dec 18, 2014

Coconut said:
Good thing that performance analysis was done with practicle CPU performance.

Coconut · Dec 18, 2014

Durante said:
When you post GameGPU results, there's always at least one guy who doesn't understand benchmarking.

Explain then.

bozzie · Dec 18, 2014

Working with an i5-4670k, GTX 970, 16GB RAM with everything on max on a 1080p display.

This game looks absolutely gorgeous. Jaw-droppingly so. No frame drops that I can notice, no tearing, no aliasing. Good job Kojima.

Stevey · Dec 18, 2014

i7 3770k@3.9GHZ
1920x1080
GTX 780 Classified 3GB (1137MHZ)
Crucial MX100 SSD
8GB RAM
Win 7 64 bit

Played for about an hour,everything maxed, rock solid 60, no drops at all so far.

Mifec · Dec 18, 2014

2560x1440
i5 3570k @ 4.6ghz
15gb RAM
GTX 780ti OC-ed a bit

Runs perfectly, constant 60, all settings maxed.

BPoole · Dec 18, 2014

Anyone with a comparable system to mine have any impression?

i5 2500k 4.2ghz
R9 290
8GB 2133Mhz ram

Playing in 1440p, but I was hoping to downsample from 1800p

Kennyfish · Dec 18, 2014

I7-870 @3.6
GTX 580(1.5gb)
344.11 Drivers
1080P
high settings

I am getting 51-60fps just running and gunning for around 10 minutes in the opening area.
I hope the 1.5gb Vram doesn't become an issue when I actually sit down and play the game for longer than 10 minutes.

GhostTrick · Dec 18, 2014

BPoole said:
Anyone with a comparable system to mine have any impression?

i5 2500k 4.2ghz
R9 290
8GB 2133Mhz ram

Playing in 1440p, but I was hoping to downsample from 1800p

At 1080p, performances are fine.
But at 1440p (I tried to downsample) I get 30-40FPS.

Support NeoGAF

Metal Gear Solid V PC Performance Thread

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Banned

Member

Banned

Junior Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Banned

Banned

Member

Banned

Member

Banned

Member

Killed by a goddamned Dredgeling

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Banned

Killed by a goddamned Dredgeling

Member

The Amiga Brotherhood

Member

Banned

Banned

Member

Banned

Member

Official GAF Bottom Feeder

Banned

Neo Member

Member

Member

Member

Neo Member

Banned

Similar threads