ShadowKingpin
Member
What? The XL is. I'm saying that if the regular New 3DS hit America, as it should have, it would have been cheaper, just as it is in other territories.
Ohhhhh my apologies. Misunderstanding on my part.
What? The XL is. I'm saying that if the regular New 3DS hit America, as it should have, it would have been cheaper, just as it is in other territories.
Italy got it 199 Euro, which is 199 USD.
So you are probably right that regular 3DS would have been 169 USD if they decided it.
What I do not get is people defending the anti-consumer decision, even if it may be business smart.
Ohhhhh my apologies. Misunderstanding on my part.
Well, I sent my e-mail to Nintendo to vent my frustration in a professional manner. I know it won't really do any good, but at least it's an additional voice to be lent.
Exactly. Basically, if I want the faster processor, exclusive features, amiibo support, improved 3D and c-stick -- which I do -- I have to take a hit on image quality (which is major to me), audio quality, form factor and aesthetic value. Not only that, I have to pay more money to take that hit than I would have if Nintendo had just offered the preferable, cheaper option (and even more still, because I'll have to buy an AC adapter if I want to sell my OG 3DS with its adapter).
I apologize too. My crow was pretty good tasting though. I thought they at least bring one color over since face plates.
I am curious why they think face plates wouldn't sell? Phone cases is a huge industry in the US.Faceplates do not appeal to the hardcore gamer confirmed.
They better be shipping AC adapters to stores at a 1:1 ratio as the new 3ds xl units.
What was that about needing to save shelf space?
Whaaaaaa??? You aren't taking a hit on image quality, that'd be like saying that going from a 40" TV to a 50" was a graphical downgrade. And audio quality? What makes the sound quality worse on the XL than the regular one? Form factor and aesthetic value I can see, but I don't care about either of those, bigger screen is better for me. It is quite silly of them not to include an AC adapter, but 5-10$ is not a huge investment. NOA could've done better, but it's insane to get so salty about it.
Whaaaaaa??? You aren't taking a hit on image quality, that'd be like saying that going from a 40" TV to a 50" was a graphical downgrade. And audio quality? What makes the sound quality worse on the XL than the regular one? Form factor and aesthetic value I can see, but I don't care about either of those, bigger screen is better for me. It is quite silly of them not to include an AC adapter, but 5-10$ is not a huge investment. NOA could've done better, but it's insane to get so salty about it.
I apologize too. My crow was pretty good tasting though. I thought they at least bring one color over since face plates.
I am curious why they think face plates wouldn't sell? Phone cases is a huge industry in the US.
And the speaker quality of the XL is notoriously worse than that of the OG 3DS.
Stop right there.
The speakers on my New 3DS XL are significantly improved over the original model and sound great.
Though the XL screens are bigger, they essentially "blow up" the image of the 3DS, without scaling the resolution to compensate for the lager image. What you get, then, is much less pixel density (the smaller screen has better PPI, or pixels-per-inch). So yes, you take a significant hit on image quality. And the speaker quality of the XL is notoriously worse than that of the OG 3DS.
It's not insane at all. Read my posts, they're completely reasonable complaints.
The bad 3DS XL speakers is known.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=536985
This I had not heard (the original XL speakers were terrible). That's good news. But it still doesn't change the reduced PPI, form factor or higher price.
The PPI is an issue. It is objectively worse.
You guys say you prefer the XL; that's great, I really wish I were in your shoes. I, however, prefer the non-XL, as do many people. Can you not understand that some consumers don't like losing features that they enjoy in order to have new features? Let alone that we'll have to pay more money to do so, if we want those new features? That's really all there is to it. I don't know how else to say it.
As said above, Xenoblade requires the New 3DS and it won't likely be the last game to require it.
Not the last, but I bet it will be one of few that require it. Why on earth would third parties (or even Nintendo) want to cut out the large install base like that? I do think it's possible we start getting two versions of games though, or the same game "enhanced" on New 3DS to take advantage of faster processor.
The PPI is an issue. It is objectively worse.
You guys say you prefer the XL; that's great, I really wish I were in your shoes. I, however, prefer the non-XL, as do many people. Can you not understand that some consumers don't like losing features that they enjoy in order to have new features? Let alone that we'll have to pay more money to do so, if we want those new features? That's really all there is to it. I don't know how else to say it.
This is incredibly lame. Why would they do this?
Definitely putting off getting a New 3DS now. They'll cave on this eventually.
The PPI is an issue. It is objectively worse.
You guys say you prefer the XL; that's great, I really wish I were in your shoes. I, however, prefer the non-XL, as do many people. Can you not understand that some consumers don't like losing features that they enjoy in order to have new features? Let alone that we'll have to pay more money to do so, if we want those new features? That's really all there is to it. I don't know how else to say it.
I see you have forgotten about the Game Boy Color. Its happened before.
This would be funny if NoA customer support wasn't getting bombarded with pissed off customers.
You're arguing with Nintendo fanboys man. You can't critcize their company at all. We both know you're right. They think you're wrong because you make Nintendo look bad.
I wish they had went for the blue system instead of black. Harken back to the initial XL release here.
Not the last, but I bet it will be one of few that require it. Why on earth would third parties (or even Nintendo) want to cut out the large install base like that? I do think it's possible we start getting two versions of games though, or the same game "enhanced" on New 3DS to take advantage of faster processor.
See if you can figure this out before you finish reading this post.
Oh.
It all makes sense now.
If Nintendo had the New 3DS come out here that would mean faceplates.
Right?
Where would you get them? Stores, online... out of the country. For the Japanese N3DSs.
It's not simply because it would be cheaper. But faceplates. They couldn't region lock them. You'd be able to import them from Japan since NOA would fuck that up, too.
Nintendo region-locked faceplates.
Not the same thing IMO. As much as I love the Mother series and would kill to see it released in NA, it's not the same as skipping over an entire handheld sku.I have a feeling that they won't cave because these will sell and it'll give them the excuse not to. If months of fans calling them about Mother 3 didn't do anything, nothing will change this.
I was going to get the XL anyway, but this just seems like a bizarre decision to make.