Windom Earle
Member
Guys, I still can't believe this will run @ 60 It sounds too good to be true.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
GTA V PC Full Graphics Options Revealed
- Thread starter Evo X
- Start date
The suggested CPU for that is a bit on the higher end so I hope that's not the barrier that needs to be overcome. Probably is given how many open world games seem CPU bound.
Also Jesus christ 40+ million copies.
CreepingFear
Member
Welp, I just had to buy it right this second. I'm downloading from steam at 11 MB/S.
Tainted
Member
I'm predicting not too many will be able to run it at a sustained 60fps
Windom Earle
Member
This is my fear as well. Scared of those sliders.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
CPU tho!?
4770k. Its fine. Really...no...ITS FINE!!!
Can't...upgrade....just...yet...skylake...
Khaos_Knight
Banned
All that bitching over delays for nothing.
Rockstar is King. Never doubt your King!!!
Rockstar is King. Never doubt your King!!!
I want to try it just to see how my laptop's i7-3610QM and Nvidia GTX 660M will handle it. lol
Goldenelementxl
Banned
5960X with Titan Black SLI here. Very curious if I can hit the same performance they saw at 4K. I will more than likely only play at 1440p though.
Uhhh ya...they showcased it on 980sli. Should be easy peasy for SLI Titties.
Eh, I'm still cautious till impressions of the released game come out. Also I'll be pushing the low end to its limits on an aging laptop. Nothing has killed it yet i5 dual core and gt525m is a real test
I'll just turn off any nvidia special effects, tessellation, ambient occlusion, and put shadows on low-medium. I really don't care about that stuff that much. I'll inject smaa instead of using their aa solutions and that should give me enough performance savings to run everything besides world detail on the highest. Hopefully the traffic density goes very very high, or you can mod it early on to be absurd.
Not really interested in the story or missions, I just want a crazy realistic and dense world to play around in.
Not really interested in the story or missions, I just want a crazy realistic and dense world to play around in.
The English Conquistador
Member
Sweetfx/Injecting should work right?
Gah...the thought of driving around, 'To Pimp a Butterfly' playing on the radio, everything great about the previous versions and much more to enjoy. Feels good.
Haha, there would be chaos if they locked this at 30.
IMACOMPUTA
Member
I think he was referring to how GTA IV was "locked" to 20fps at launch.. by requiring a super computer to run at a steady framerate. Lol
I don't understand why so many games don't provide SMAA. It's like FXAA, but it sucks way, way less. And injecting it with SweetFX makes things like fine text look badly dithered.
The pcgamer article in the OP states you do get to choose FXAA, MSAA or TXAA
CarbonFire
Member
Not unless Boris, the creator of ENB (which ICEhancer is based on), creates an ENB version for DirectX 11.
We have Reshade, but it's unknown whether or not they'll be able to access the depth buffer, which is required for some of the more advanced lighting and shading effects.
But SMAA is the best!!!
Can Gedesato or other programs force it? Or is that something nvidia need to do. I can't think of any game that does use it
You'd need to use ReShade to inject it with sweetfx, unless you don't mind running with DX9.
Objectively Bad Opinion
Member
Only SMAA 1x. Which is like FXAA. SMAA T-something is the mode that has a temporal component (so like TXAA) and SMAA S-something is the one with the extra samples (so like MSAA + SMAA 1x)
I find SMAA 1x gives a much more pleasing image than FXAA. I know technically they're both doing something more or less the same, but SMAA just bothers me less. It just seems like it blurs less.
The Albatross
Member
Wow, awesome video. Can't wait to see what you put together with GTA V.
Don't worry, it'll be there and you just won't have the option to turn it off.
If you edit the ini file you'll received a PM from Rockstar about how you're ruining their artistic vision.
jim2point0
Banned
I don't think DX9 is going to be an option in GTAV..... is it?
texhnolyze
Banned
Yeah, I just looked at the requirements and it only goes down to vista, so it's prolly dx10 at a minimum. I just assumed it would, since it tells you the directx version in the option menu.
If I can't get 60 FPS maxed out @ 1440p on my GTX Titan SC and i7 4770k. I will call this not optimized.
People still worry about VRAM usage in games?
That stealth brag. Yes Smokey we get it you have Titan X's.
I'm still not jealous, I got a Titan with 6GB VRAM, never had to worry, and it has been what now? 2 years since I bought my PC.
CarbonFire
Member
Probably for DX10, which is where Vista tops out, right?
DJSebolski
Member
What's the best deal out there? GMG sent me a 22%off voucher.
TheAdmiester
Member
Vista supports DX11, so I think this is DX11 only.
CarbonFire
Member
Does ReShade have access to the framebuffer in DX11 though? I was under the impression that it didn't or at least it was more limited than what ENB has access to in DX9.
icecold1983
Member
txaa yes! hopefully it works
CarbonFire
Member
Then perhaps we may see a future update with DX12 when Win10 (and maybe GTA expansion) hits? Doesn't make sense to have a DirectX toggle with only one option otherwise.
texhnolyze
Banned
Crimsonclaw111
Member
Nuuvem for $29 via VPN if it still works.
The requirements state DX10 minimum and the settings have a 'DirectX version' option so presumably that means it's configurable:
TAJ
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
ILM started using this on Dragonheart almost 20 years ago. They called it y-cast shadows or something. It's been too long and Google is no help.
jim2point0
Banned
I remember it hitting my FPS in Far Cry 4 pretty hard. Let me go check...
RenegadeXV8
Banned
AMD's CHS would probably be a far better choice in this case, as the performance impact is nowhere near as big as PCSS and it looks fairly similar.
Taco_Human
Member
Is there an unlocked refresh rate? I'm really hoping for 120 hz.
UnrealEck
Member
They seem to be really proud of the 60 FPS thing since they keep going on about it, so I would get too hopeful for 120 FPS outside of modding.