• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Witcher 3 PC Performance Thread

Easy_D

never left the stone age
My bad didn't see ;p

Never the less i think i might just get a new PSU over a new motherboard it seems. I can live with the m5a97 for a bit longer, since there aren't that many choices mb wise and i don't want to go into the 150+ range. Even though my current psu has served me well even though the brand is not the greatest, its time to step it up.

Ah, I have a 650w Corsair, forgot model, but it's doing a good job. Had a 550w corsair PSU in the same rig but I switched just in case, that one worked fine as well. And yeah, with AM3+ being a dead socket it's not really worth investing in a new mobo unless it dies. Like mine did 2 months ago, both motherboard and gpu just fried :(. But got them replaced now so all's well.

Old mobo was actually a M5A97, one of the USB hubs on the back fried so it refused to start :/
 

Grechy34

Member
Watching a few youtube vids I still think with everything on ultra including all the uber settings unless your running in SLI (and it's working) their will be frame dips. I'm going to be running this on 2 setups.

My Main.

CPU: Intel® Core™ i7 4790K
CPU Cooler: NZXT Kraken X61 280mm AIO Liquid CPU Cooler
Motherboard: ASRock Z97 Extreme4 Motherboard
Graphics: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Superclocked ACX 2.0 4GB
Memory: Kingston Hyper X Fury HX318C10FK2/16 16GB (2x8GB) Blue
Solid State Drive: Samsung 850 EVO Series 250GB SSD
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 2TB ST2000DM001
Power Supply: Be Quiet! Pure Power L8 600W Power Supply
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 32/64-bit Retail DVD

Alienware Alpha:

CPU: i7 4765
Graphics: GTX860M 2GB
RAM: 8GB DDR3

Only thing that will kill me on this rig is the 5400RPM HDD. Loading times will suck.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Translation: Nvidia are dicks. Meanwhile TressFX in Tomb Raider ran about as well on AMD and Nvidia gpus.

Alice Madness Returns is still the GOAT when it comes to nice looking hair + performance though .P
 

MayMay

Banned
Translation: Nvidia are dicks. Meanwhile TressFX in Tomb Raider ran about as well on AMD and Nvidia gpus.

Alice Madness Returns is still the GOAT when it comes to nice looking hair + performance though .P

Lol, as far as I remember tressFX ran waayyyy worse on nvidia GPUs. At least on release.
 

Kezen

Banned
Translation: Nvidia are dicks. Meanwhile TressFX in Tomb Raider ran about as well on AMD and Nvidia gpus.

Nope. My experience was that it ran much better on AMD GPUs for good reasons : they are, for the most part, better at compute.
But it's true that they have allowed complete authority on the code, unlike Nvidia and Hairworks.
Nvidia claim it's industry practice but that sucks for AMD gamers.
 

Qassim

Member
Here's the official word on the Game Ready Witcher 3 driver: http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/geforce-352-86-whql-driver-released

SLI users will enjoy the included picture ;)

Now, back to finishing this guide.

XYzllvf.jpg


This makes me sad when I remember it's not possible to use these technologies together yet (G-SYNC + SLI + DSR) yet :(
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Lol, as far as I remember tressFX ran waayyyy worse on nvidia GPUs. At least on release.

It did? Maybe that patch for intel HD GPUs and Nvidia gpus helped it run better.
Nope. My experience was that it ran much better on AMD GPUs for good reasons : they are, for the most part, better at compute.
But it's true that they have allowed complete authority on the code, unlike Nvidia and Hairworks.
Nvidia claim it's industry practice but that sucks for AMD gamers.

I see, thanks for clarifying
 

JaseC

gave away the keys to the kingdom.
i5-750 is a minimum requirement. You should be able to run it "ok". Depends on GPU too.

PCGH reported a couple of days ago that the game was still "playable" on a 2GHz 4790K. I don't see CPU power having a particularly noticeable effect on framerate.
 
Ah, I have a 650w Corsair, forgot model, but it's doing a good job. Had a 550w corsair PSU in the same rig but I switched just in case, that one worked fine as well. And yeah, with AM3+ being a dead socket it's not really worth investing in a new mobo unless it dies. Like mine did 2 months ago, both motherboard and gpu just fried :(. But got them replaced now so all's well.

Old mobo was actually a M5A97, one of the USB hubs on the back fried so it refused to start :/

Yeah AM3+ does not have many choices left really. Might have to jump on the intel bandwagon one day. ;p

Anywas has the Corsair served you okay? because i keep seeing some people saying to avoid them.

Rather it be the 400 or 600M and the non M models even. Having a pickle of a time picking out a new one since I'm not spending more then a 100 bucks on one (Sorry Seasonic), but currently have a multi rail PSU at 12v 22A and 12v 22A nice package really psu wise, though again its not the most trusted brand. Also does it really not matter rather if its one rail or two in you're opinion?
 

Ganzor

Member
Any news on AMD performance? Hope the game will run great on my 4790k @ 4.4ghz and an overclocked R9 290, i guess no fancy fur for me though :(
 

kraspkibble

Permabanned.
can someone give me an idea of what to expect from an i5-4590/8GB/290 4GB (w/ ~11% OC) ??

the nvidia image i seen said that a 960 will get 1080p on high. but nothing about frame rate. a 970 i think was the same except ultra. i wouldn't mind 1080p on high. i'd like to get a stable 60fps but if i can cap it at 30fps that would be fine!
 

thebloo

Member
PCGH reported a couple of days ago that the game was still "playable" on a 2GHz 4790K. That's a clockspeed reduction of roughly 55%.

Yeah, but that CPU has hyperthreading, while a i5-750 does not. Which may or may not take its toll.
 
CPU: Intel® Core™ i7 4790K
Graphics: Gigabyte GTX 980 4GB DDR4 RAM
RAM: Kingston Hyper X Fury HX318C10FK2/16 16GB (2x8GB) White
Solid State Drive: Samsung 850 EVO Series 500GB SSD
Windows 7
 

Kezen

Banned
PCGH reported a couple of days ago that the game was still "playable" on a 2GHz 4790K. I don't see CPU power having a particularly noticeable effect on framerate.

That is extremely surprising, I was expecting max settings to be very heavy on the CPU.
But then this was back when the game looked much better.
 

ISee

Member
Watching a few youtube vids I still think with everything on ultra including all the uber settings unless your running in SLI (and it's working) their will be frame dips. I'm going to be running this on 2 setups.

My Main.

CPU: Intel® Core™ i7 4790K
CPU Cooler: NZXT Kraken X61 280mm AIO Liquid CPU Cooler
Motherboard: ASRock Z97 Extreme4 Motherboard
Graphics: EVGA GeForce GTX 980 Superclocked ACX 2.0 4GB
Memory: Kingston Hyper X Fury HX318C10FK2/16 16GB (2x8GB) Blue
Solid State Drive: Samsung 850 EVO Series 250GB SSD
Hard Drive: Seagate Barracuda 2TB ST2000DM001
Power Supply: Be Quiet! Pure Power L8 600W Power Supply
Operating System: Microsoft Windows 8.1 32/64-bit Retail DVD

Alienware Alpha:

CPU: i7 4765
Graphics: GTX860M 2GB
RAM: 8GB DDR3

Only thing that will kill me on this rig is the 5400RPM HDD. Loading times will suck.

Just out of curiosity as everybody can buy whatever he wants with his money. But why did you buy an alienware alpha when your main PC is obviously a powerhouse? Just a collectors thing or is there another reason behind it?
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Yeah AM3+ does not have many choices left really. Might have to jump on the intel bandwagon one day. ;p

Anywas has the Corsair served you okay? because i keep seeing some people saying to avoid them.

Rather it be the 400 or 600M and the non M models even. Having a pickle of a time picking out a new one since I'm not spending more then a 100 bucks on one (Sorry Seasonic), but currently have a multi rail PSU at 12v 22A and 12v 22A nice package really psu wise, though again its not the most trusted brand. Also does it really not matter rather if its one rail or two in you're opinion?

The 550w one had been used since 2008 :p. Didn't notice any degradation really
 

Zakalwe

Banned
My MSI 970 is arriving tomorrow. Pairing with an i5 2500k @4.3ghz. Funny how this CPU is listed as minimum yet it's still so beastly (especially with the ease of OC).

Can't wait to play a game I'm actually excited about. It's been too long.
 

MisterM

Member
7870 XT (Tahiti LE) represent!

Got my core clock set to 1100MHz, I haven't bothered to try and push it further. also have an i5-3570 non-K and 16GB RAM.

I'm hoping for decent settings at 1080p / 30fps. I'm so glad this game has a built in frame limiter.
 

Static Jak

Member
My MSI 970 is arriving tomorrow. Pairing with an i5 2500k @4.3ghz. Funny how this CPU is listed as minimum yet it's still so beastly (especially with the ease of OC).

Can't wait to play a game I'm actually excited about. It's been too long.
I wish I went with a k but I just had to penny pinch. Hopefully my non-k 2500 will be able to keep up. You won't regret the MSI 970 either, great GPU from my experience.
 

Grechy34

Member
Just out of curiosity as everybody can buy whatever he wants with his money. But why did you buy an alienware alpha when your main PC is obviously a powerhouse? Just a collectors thing or is there another reason behind it?

Good question to be honest. I bought the Alienware Alpha on the spot kind of thing in store. at the time I had my gaming laptop (dust collector now) which is still quite decent - i7, 680GTX,16GB. On both setups I still couldn't really Ultra games so I built a PC. Kind of got a promotion at work and spent silly. I even bought a MAC at the time.

You could say it's a complete waste of money and you'd be right. I should have built the PC from the start.
 

Bod

Neo Member
Just installed my new GTX 970. Getting The Witcher 3 and Arkham Knight for free was a deal just to good to turn down. Cant wait till midnight
 

Evo X

Member
This makes me sad when I remember it's not possible to use these technologies together yet (G-SYNC + SLI + DSR) yet :(

That's the main reason I got rid of my 980 SLI setup and picked up a Titan X. GSYNC + DSR are too damn good to give up.
 

Zakalwe

Banned
I wish I went with a k but I just had to penny pinch. Hopefully my non-k 2500 will be able to keep up. You won't regret the MSI 970 either, great GPU from my experience.

I can't wait to hook it up. Been squeezing my 670 for the last few months and while it's definitely still capable it's beginning to show its age. I feel sad retiring it, but life goes on.

You should sell your -k on ebay for £70-80 and pick up a +k for £90-100. :p
 

Static Jak

Member
I can't wait to hook it up. Been squeezing my 670 for the last few months and while it's definitely still capable it's beginning to show its age. I feel sad retiring it, but life goes on.

You should sell your -k on ebay for £70-80 and pick up a +k for £90-100. :p
I'm just gonna hold out and wait for Intels Skylake at this stage. Tbh, my non k has been able to keep up with everything so far so I can wait a while longer.

Someone said earlier that it does. I just hope it's true.
It'd definitely be a handy feature to have in the settings.
 
I'll withhold from installing these new drivers just to measure the performance difference on my rig.

My MSI 970 is arriving tomorrow. Pairing with an i5 2500k @4.3ghz. Funny how this CPU is listed as minimum yet it's still so beastly (especially with the ease of OC).

Can't wait to play a game I'm actually excited about. It's been too long.
That's my exact configuration. Installed the GPU on Friday and I'm pretty happy with it so far. The MSI card is overclocked by default at frequencies that aren't that far from stock 980 frequencies.
 
Top Bottom