water_wendi
Water is not wet!
To bad there is not a fridge near by, be all like:
New Vegas proved that didnt work so well.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Fallout 4 Officially Revealed for PC, Xbox One, PS4 [Reddit Rumor = Ban]
- Thread starter chadskin
- Start date
New Vegas proved that didnt work so well.
TheLostBigBoss
Banned
This world is not real and I will prove it by jumping off this balcony and defying the logic of reality.
That's amazing
RPGCrazied
Member
New Vegas proved that didnt work so well.
Lol, that is great. Haven't played far into New Vegas. Is that a quest or just easter egg?
NecromorphTX
Member
Easter egg
Lord of Castamere
Member
Rewatching the trailer the house Dog is in has a fence, so you probably can't leave in past mode. You'll probably only be able to switch in quest/hub areas. Predefined.
BleedOrange
Banned
That looked really, really bad. Obviously developed with current gen as a focus and not PC.
Davey Cakes
Member
I couldn't care less about the graphics.
Just make the world more interesting and dense than Fallout 3.
I mean, I LOVED Fallout 3 but there was so much wasted space. There were also many repetitive parts. Pretty much all of the underground areas were boring and don't even get me started on the travesty that was the subway.
Just make the world more interesting and dense than Fallout 3.
I mean, I LOVED Fallout 3 but there was so much wasted space. There were also many repetitive parts. Pretty much all of the underground areas were boring and don't even get me started on the travesty that was the subway.
Should show the herky jerky petting animation it had right before, that got me the most in the trailer.
DJSebolski
Member
Let's go, pal.
TheContact
Member
Oh my. It's happening
lem0n
Member
I'll be playing on PC as well, but you can't honestly expect them to only focus on the PC version, right? They have to run on current gen machines. I don't get why you're upset at this.
ARMA 3 already does way more CPU intensive tasks, and yet looks like one of the best games on PC.
Crimsonclaw111
Member
I saw all the graphics complaints and I thought they were hyperbole. That does look rather... um. Well it better run 1080p/60fps on consoles.
Dirk Benedict
Member
Given how Nelson couldn't shut up about hinting towards this, since asked what conference he is looking most forward to @ E3, I will be getting this on PC and on PS4 after the timed DLC is all done with, since it'll most likely be a console thing. BTW, I own NV and FO3 on both PC and PS3, with a similar action taken when they were released.
Also, the graphics are not the best, but there are noticeable improvements none-the-less. You just gotta look, lol.
PC preordered. Kreygasm
Also, the graphics are not the best, but there are noticeable improvements none-the-less. You just gotta look, lol.
PC preordered. Kreygasm
triplestation
Member
why would they release a ps3/360 version a year later after the new gen versions? 
LurkerPrime
Member
Trailer was OK, I guess. I've never much cared for the forced retro aesthetic of Fallout, and Bethesda's writing is always bottom-tier... it all depends on how interesting the gameplay is.
Bethesda. Bethesda never changes.
Bethesda. Bethesda never changes.
Fata1moose
Banned
:lol That's doubtful. There could be other reasons it's not a looker, no more interior cells the require loading for example.
Well, I'm excited, but I will wait for the GOTY edition, unofficial patches, and texture packs (I hope NMC and Vurt do some) before I buy.
Is Point Lookout that good? I played the other 3 DLC and wasn't impressed (OA felt like COD, Mothership Zeta had its moments, but kept crashing on me, and The Pitt was just forgettable) and heard that you needed to be a high level (20+) to handle Point Lookout, but by that time I just wanted the game to be over...
I really hope the DLC is better this time around (I loved NV's DLC, but that was Obsidian so I'm not expecting anything of that quality).
Is Point Lookout that good? I played the other 3 DLC and wasn't impressed (OA felt like COD, Mothership Zeta had its moments, but kept crashing on me, and The Pitt was just forgettable) and heard that you needed to be a high level (20+) to handle Point Lookout, but by that time I just wanted the game to be over...
I really hope the DLC is better this time around (I loved NV's DLC, but that was Obsidian so I'm not expecting anything of that quality).
triplestation
Member
is it me or the more you look at the trailer the better it starts to look?
NullPointer
Member
A fair point. Bethesda can consider my expectations thoroughly in check, and with an eye towards gameplay improvements in the weeks and months ahead.
It's definitely you...it always looked good.
Have you been drinking?
BleedOrange
Banned
This is Bethesda as fuck.
[edit]
Bethesda must be using the same people that did the humans for Pixar in Toy Story.
Holy shit... my sides!
I must say it is really sad that people are so obsessed with graphics. I am not saying they don't matter. They matter to an extent, but some people really have a very high standard when it comes to it.
I think some people need to be less shallow when it comes to graphics, you will enjoy gaming a lot more trust me.
I am really looking to this game. It has been a while since stepping into a Fallout game.
I think some people need to be less shallow when it comes to graphics, you will enjoy gaming a lot more trust me.
I am really looking to this game. It has been a while since stepping into a Fallout game.
That's probably due more to Bethesda not using a good engine and not being able to make a decent looking Fallout game in general, rather than the limitations of the console hardware.
Felix Lighter
Member
I think the game is exceptionally ugly but if the game is seamless, no loading, no separate interior/city maps, that is so much more important for me.
ShyGuy0504
Member
I'm glad that this game apparently isn't cross gen.
That means that the game won't be designed around systems with 512MB of RAM.
Hopefully that means a lot less loading and less limitations when it comes to modding the PC version.
That means that the game won't be designed around systems with 512MB of RAM.
Hopefully that means a lot less loading and less limitations when it comes to modding the PC version.
Apoleptica
Banned
Woah. This all seems legit, definitely deserves some more attention.
Ophiuchus
Member
Actually such graphics is perfect for ambiance that the game tries to deliver.We haven't seen any gameplay so judging it based on engine would be pointless.
ViewtifulJC
Banned
that dog animation in the beginning...woof
InfiniteBento
Member
I wasn't expecting so much outrage over the graphics in here. I don't really mind them but I do admit that that hand animation on the dog was pretty bad.
Soyongdori
Member
It's not the best looking graphic, but this is Bethesda we are talking about.
Mobius and pet octopus
Member
Hand animations... expecting outrage if this game gets a 8 or higher.
shacklesmcgee
Member
nah
That was posted 11 months ago, in July 2014.
Most of it is based off of this 2013 Kotaku article, with only a couple things changed, such as gender option, and the random DLC schedule plus Naughty Bear people spin-off: http://kotaku.com/leaked-documents-reveal-that-fallout-4-is-real-set-in-1481322956
Unless you have something better to back it up, keep it out of the thread please.
EscapeArtist
Banned
I'm a little shocked by it as well, it's like "here's a thing that I've wanted for years now...but it looks slightly different than I imagined so now I'm pissed". Seems crazy, I'm just glad we're getting a new Fallout game and it actually has some damn color.
ComputerBlue
Member
That's pretty interesting, and look at how everyone responded to it.
3 times the size of Skyrim. Amazing.
Edit: ah.
triplestation
Member
no i already thought it looked good but not outstanding but gradually its been growing on me and im appreciating the finer details
for example i can imagine raiders or a super mutant or a deathclaw in the background of this scene and i think itd look fantastic
Mobius and pet octopus
Member
Bethesda should know by now that war (over graphic superiority) never changes.
Apoleptica
Banned
Oblivion was at one point unmatched in graphics in 2006, it set a new bar. So we can't really say Bethesda is known for terrible graphics. Morrowind too had some amazing looking water for its time.
This was incredible for 2006
This was incredible for 2002
For me the disappointment about the use of the same old engine is not so much about the quality of the graphics, or lack of thereof, but knowing that it is a buggy piece of crap.
jhmtehgamr20xx
Banned
Ho Lee Shi Te 60+ pages later and people are still complaining about the graphics.
This is sad.
This is sad.
SoulUnison
Banned
Man, when did everybody else get so cynical, or am I just suddenly old?
My first system was the NES.
Everybody in here is like "It looks so dated!"
I was like "It looks so much better than New Vegas, oh my god! This is amazing!"
Except the final shot. Though that's more of an art direction and tradition thing than a graphical issue.
That blue Vault jumpsuit looks pretty silly.
My first system was the NES.
Everybody in here is like "It looks so dated!"
I was like "It looks so much better than New Vegas, oh my god! This is amazing!"
Except the final shot. Though that's more of an art direction and tradition thing than a graphical issue.
That blue Vault jumpsuit looks pretty silly.
Shadowplay1979
Member
My complaint isn't that the graphics aren't spectacular..its the game just looks exactly like Fallout 3. If you arent gonna do anything really new or interesting..then at least make it fallout with amazing visuals...instead im confused as to why people are falling over themselves from this video
nostalgia? the brand name?
it just looks meh to me..like i played this game before.
I'm going off only what i see so far in the trailer.
nostalgia? the brand name?
it just looks meh to me..like i played this game before.
I'm going off only what i see so far in the trailer.