• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New Horizons will flyby Pluto on July 14th

Status
Not open for further replies.

A-V-B

Member
No, it has to do with scale. Like if the Pillars of Eternity are 100K times as far from Earth as Pluto is, but it's 100MM times larger than Pluto, then we're going to be able to get a picture 1000 times clearer. Those aren't the right numbers, but you get the idea.

Jesus, how big was the Kickstarter?
 
Jesus, how big was the Kickstarter?

Shit, I meant the Pillars of Creation. These:

gty_pillars_of_creation_jef_120604_wblog.jpg
 

Orbis

Member
Amateurs have been processing more of the images to make them clearer. Here's a couple (Pluto is the larger, brighter in both. Charon the smaller). Worth noting that stacking and processing images like this can exaggerate image features that are just 'noise' (so don't exist).

10293-1434962199.jpg

This one is colourised based on previous data:
20150623_Pluto_21_June_2015_f537.png

Source for both: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=7970

Also there's a quote here with some scientific reaction to what we're seeing so far:
“This system is just amazing,” said Alan Stern, New Horizons principal investigator, from the Southwest Research Institute, in Colorado. “The science team is just ecstatic with what we see on Pluto’s close approach hemisphere. Every terrain type we see on the planet – including both the brightest and darkest surface areas – are represented there, it’s a wonderland.

“And about Charon – wow – I don’t think anyone expected Charon to reveal a mystery like dark terrains at its pole,” he continued. “Who ordered that?”
Source: http://www.irishexaminer.com/breaki...-charon--and-no-one-expected-that-683405.html via user centsworth_II in the same forum topic.
 

foxuzamaki

Doesn't read OPs, especially not his own
Amateurs have been processing more of the images to make them clearer. Here's a couple (Pluto is the larger, brighter in both. Charon the smaller). Worth noting that stacking and processing images like this can exaggerate image features that are just 'noise' (so don't exist).

10293-1434962199.jpg

This one is colourised based on previous data:
20150623_Pluto_21_June_2015_f537.png

Source for both: http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=7970

Also there's a quote here with some scientific reaction to what we're seeing so far:

Source: http://www.irishexaminer.com/breaki...-charon--and-no-one-expected-that-683405.html via user centsworth_II in the same forum topic.
So pluto isnt just a big ball of ice as we predicted.
 
What amazes me is how we get all the data back.

I mean think about it. Trying to keep a WiFi signal in a decent sized house is a nightmare.

Losing a 3G/4G signal on our own planet.

Yet we can get pictures from Pluto...
 

StayDead

Member
Meanwhile on Pluto.

YA3CLz6.jpg


This is amazing. Pluto will always be a planet to me <3 Will New Horizons continue to move out away from our solar system?

Wouldn't it be amazing if we could set it to orbit around pluto and travel around for a while.
 

Par Score

Member
R&D, paying employees etc. Seems like a big waste of money to take some pictures.

The US Federal budget expenditure for 2014 was $3.50 trillion.

This mission cost $700 million over 15 years.

That means, on an annual basis, it accounts for just over 0.001% of total US Federal expenditure (NASA in total accounts for about 0.5%, compared to, say, the Department of Defense (not including Intelligence and Homeland Security), which gets around 15%).
 

Marz

Member
The US Federal budget expenditure for 2014 was $3.50 trillion.

This mission cost $700 million over 15 years.

That means, on an annual basis, it accounts for just over 0.001% of total US Federal expenditure (NASA in total accounts for about 0.5%, compared to, say, the Department of Defense (not including Intelligence and Homeland Security), which gets around 15%).

Lol fuck.
 
The US Federal budget expenditure for 2014 was $3.50 trillion.

This mission cost $700 million over 15 years.

That means, on an annual basis, it accounts for just over 0.001% of total US Federal expenditure (NASA in total accounts for about 0.5%, compared to, say, the Department of Defense (not including Intelligence and Homeland Security), which gets around 15%).

Only $700 Million over 15 years to send a space camera to Pluto for some holiday snaps? Right, get on it!
 

Log4Girlz

Member
The US Federal budget expenditure for 2014 was $3.50 trillion.

This mission cost $700 million over 15 years.

That means, on an annual basis, it accounts for just over 0.001% of total US Federal expenditure (NASA in total accounts for about 0.5%, compared to, say, the Department of Defense (not including Intelligence and Homeland Security), which gets around 15%).

Waste of money. Scrap Nasa and strip the military to a bare minimum. We have nukes, so we only need coast guard. :p
 

Chittagong

Gold Member
The US Federal budget expenditure for 2014 was $3.50 trillion.

This mission cost $700 million over 15 years.

That means, on an annual basis, it accounts for just over 0.001% of total US Federal expenditure (NASA in total accounts for about 0.5%, compared to, say, the Department of Defense (not including Intelligence and Homeland Security), which gets around 15%).

For even more perspective, the most expensive estimate of putting *man on Mars* is $500 billion. Spread over 10 years, that would be $50 billion a year, or bit over 1% of the total US federal expenditure. And that's the most expensive estimate. Lowest estimate is $6B for the entire thing.
 

Log4Girlz

Member
For even more perspective, the most expensive estimate of putting *man on Mars* is $500 billion. Spread over 10 years, that would be $50 billion a year, or bit over 1% of the total US federal expenditure. And that's the most expensive estimate. Lowest estimate is $6B for the entire thing.

6b is a joke estimate. May as well say ten dollars.
 
Surely we (and I say "we" as in humanity, as I'm not American) shouldn't be spending zero money on space exploration and discovery. The question is: how much should we be spending, if not nothing? Personally, I don't think we spend enough - considering the predicament we find ourselves in on Earth.
 
I'd love it if GAF could have a space sciences thread that doesn't devolve into goddamn debate about whether it's a worthwhile endeavor because of the costs.
 
Surely we (and I say "we" as in humanity, as I'm not American) shouldn't be spending zero money on space exploration and discovery. The question is: how much should we be spending, if not nothing? Personally, I don't think we spend enough - considering the predicament we find ourselves in on Earth.

Space exploration and settlement, Fusion R&D, and renewable energies should be what governments spend the most on.

But it's more important to figure out better ways to kill ourselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom