Halo 5 also runs at twice the framerate.
When Halo 5 turns into a open world game with thousands of lines of dialogue and a full crafting system, then we can compare.
Halo 5 also runs at twice the framerate.
When Halo 5 turns into a open world game with thousands of lines of dialogue and a full crafting system, then we can compare.
Looks like my asshole when I forget to wipe.
Looks like my asshole when I forget to wipe.
My computer hits the minimum requirements for the pc version, would I be better off getting that instead of the ps4 version?
My computer hits the minimum requirements for the pc version, would I be better off getting that instead of the ps4 version?
My computer hits the minimum requirements for the pc version, would I be better off getting that instead of the ps4 version?
Looks fine to me, dunno what anyone else expected of an open world game of this scale on console hardware really. PC always has and will be the place to play Bethesda's stuff.
But besides, graphics don't make the game. Order 1886 was enough proof of that.
Not sure if serious, because not everyone is acting in the manner he is presenting.
Yeah, what Deep said, it really was just a few people. One of whom got banned.
I don't mind people hating on the graphics. I just mind the few people who act like the game doesn't have a right to exist because of them.
Except your point still isn't really that good because you, like several other people in the thread act like game developers have to check specific boxes, and are required by the laws of gaming to allocate as much resource as equally possibly to all these different places.
In other words, you think it's a REQUIREMENT that Bethesda games should have amazing mindblowing graphics, because it's a post-apoc game that makes millions.
Have you ever considered that MAYBE, they don't care about the graphics as much, because they know most of the fans don't either? Yes, it would be nice if Fallout had great graphics, but it didn't the last two times, and it doesn't now.
They added a full, dynamic extremely in-depth crafting and building system, where almost every single physical asset in the game can be picked up, rearranged, or given a purpose in gameplay. They've completely retooled the way combat and stats work. This game has 100s and 100s of NPCs, all with stats and items and behavior patterns that need to be accounted for. They literally spent over 2 years of doing the protagonist recording lines. This game has over 111,000 voiced lines, to ensure that the game delivers the same level of freedom of choice that Fallout fans have come to expect. More than Fallout 3 and Skyrim combined. They have gone above and beyond to ensure that this is an exciting, full game with a huge world
1.
2.
Screen shot two is from the E3 demo. I'm assuming that it was running on PC, but still the difference is big.
Ok i said this when someone else said it like 38 pages back..this stupid excuse is getting really really freaking old.Looks fine to me, dunno what anyone else expected of an open world game of this scale on console hardware really. PC always has and will be the place to play Bethesda's stuff.
But besides, graphics don't make the game. Order 1886 was enough proof of that.
So it looks amazing. Got it.Looks like my asshole when I forget to wipe.
It will probably look good in motion
Yeah...definitely a difference. There's indeed no shadows, i see foliage missing. I guess they all pop up when you get closer?
Sigh...certainly did not expect that. I hate to say this, cause i know these developers work their ass off, but certainly these consoles should be easily able to handle that?
I specifically meant this bit.
People don't understand why the game doesn't and won't have nice graphics. But yeah that guy deserved to get banned.
Consider that the high budget was dedicated to more than just graphics, way more. They also seem to have made a ton of improvements to their engine aside from the rendering of materials/skin along with animation being much better than their last gen games. GDC should be quite interesting since they should shed some light on where they hit a bottleneck. It's quite hard to compare to other games on a technical level because so much is dedicated to physical objects that the player can interact with directly in comparison to other titles.Horrible graphics for a game that is supposed to have a high budget.
They should stop using the gamebryo engine.
Yes graphics equal good engineIt's another Titanfall situation. Devs choose a garbage engine to save time and release a last gen looking game. It's awful.
That's most likely the PC version.
Then let's compare The Witcher 3.
It's another Titanfall situation. Devs choose a garbage engine to save time and release a last gen looking game. It's awful.
1.
2.
Screen shot two is from the E3 demo. I'm assuming that it was running on PC, but still the difference is big.
EDIT: I don't know pic 1 doesn't have that foggy blur effect that pic 2 has. Will be interesting to see what the game actually looks like on all platforms. Regardless I'll have fun playing it.
Something akin to TW3 maybe?
My computer hits the minimum requirements for the pc version, would I be better off getting that instead of the ps4 version?
7 years.
In this specific example, top pic looks better imo :/
Funny enough, someone said earlier in this thread that the order 1886's brilliant visuals does not make up for it's supposedly subpar gameplay. Of course, how good you think a game is totally subjective, but usually that's never considered. One think I will say is that the screens and visuals here leads to an objective view of what they've accomplished in comparison to open world games, the screens certainly do not lie, but I'd like to see some more direct captures from all systems or hd video because the media in the OP is not very flattering.Come on now, don't let other people's views affect you. A lot of people thought The Order 1886 was a load of manure here while it's one of my favorite games this year. Same with other games as well. Try to have an open mind. Everything in the world is disliked or criticized by someone.
It's another Titanfall situation. Devs choose a garbage engine to save time and release a last gen looking game. It's awful.
I can't believe people are actually saying Mike's girlfriend doesn't look ugly. Seriously. You may like spending time with her (I know I do), and you should, but be honest with yourself. She looks like a high school girl.
Can you imagine what the stalker engine (x ray) people could do with a budget like Bethesda has? It is not a just world.